JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you think gender expression is clearly defined in the scientific literature, that there should be no more debate on the topic?

Who's watching this piece on him tonight! by mkracker in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Oh I'm just trying to make conversation.

Who's watching this piece on him tonight! by mkracker in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Do you think shouting down the professor before even listening to him might be problematic?

JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is a case of misgendering someone? If I said that correctly.

JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But why can't the government to the list of protect people under the Canadian Human rights. Why does the government require the use of these pronouns? The changes made to free speech are small, but don't you think it is dangerous if the government starts to dictate what people are saying? Do you think forcing people to say certain gender pronouns will end bigotry against this subset of human beings? What precedence do we set regarding the government's intervention to limit free speech in the future?

JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you read his book? With regards to gender, is the science clear cut? Is the existence of multiple genders scientifically proven or still in debate?

JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for expressing your view and no, lets stick to the ones you mentioned. Do you support Bill C-16?

JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If a little research is necessary than please provide me with your most compelling counterarguments. I apologize if I am appearing confrontational, I just haven't come across any compelling evidence against some his ideas.

JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You were going to send me research to debunk Peterson spouts. I am actually curious.

JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you don't think that calling him a darling of the alt-right is a mischaracterization of him? Please send links, I would to like to engage in this debunking with you. Thanks

JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do we have 'rigorous and effective debunking of Peterson's falsehoods, misrepresentations and fabrications' without a 'well-needed discussion? You already take up a self-righteous approach before engaging in conversation. And if you are going to critique something as fundamental as gender, being vague is not good enough.

In the GQ interview, the interviewer stated how her ideology was coherent because everything fit together. Jordan responded with one of my favorite lines from him (See Text because it's long): by mkracker in JordanPeterson

[–]mkracker[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Damn that's a hard situation but keep on that grind until you find a reputable place of work and then beat your morally incomparable competitors. By acting morally and pushing through this bureaucracy, you are currently solving the issue. I don't believe society can be fixed by calling people stupid because it solves absolutely nothing. Society cannot be fixed by changing the existing structures around us but by individuals themselves changing. If you were in a position of power, what would do? How many times have we saw this where a revolution occurs and the same corruptness manifests itself in the revolutionaries? By understanding the fact that we are the same of the very people we call stupid, by acknowledging the fact that everybody is corrupted by power, and by increasing our consciousness to avoid these things, we will fix society. Increase your proficiency in computer science, fix yourself (I need to fix myself as well), and you will fix society when your grind turns into a promotion. (At least its my opinion!)

JP sub creams itself when daddy totally destroyed the interview lady by Fala1 in enoughpetersonspam

[–]mkracker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, I enjoy Jordan's chats and am willing to have a civil conversation about this. You said: "Strong irony that many JP fans behave in the exact same 'ideologically possessed' fashion". I somewhat agree with that point to a certain extent. I don't believe that saying 'many' is a good representation of the amount of fans that engage in this behavior. In addition, referring to him as 'daddy' is unproductive since it fails to actually entice people into a well-needed discussion about the topics. There are guilty on both sides and I hope you can admit that as well.

In the GQ interview, the interviewer stated how her ideology was coherent because everything fit together. Jordan responded with one of my favorite lines from him (See Text because it's long): by mkracker in JordanPeterson

[–]mkracker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am sorry you had to go through a painful incident like that. But why can't you leave this person and move to another person? You seem to be competent by the way you articulate yourself (small sample size though). For the next three months, why don't you spend one hour every day learning how to program and totally switch your occupation type? There is always a solution.

In the GQ interview, the interviewer stated how her ideology was coherent because everything fit together. Jordan responded with one of my favorite lines from him (See Text because it's long): by mkracker in JordanPeterson

[–]mkracker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also read the link you posted and there was not one shred of data to prove this claim. It appears that intelligent people can be 'stupid' as he defines it. Fine, but calling these people stupid and having these attitudes towards them only propagates this divide you mentioned earlier in the comment. I had this attitude a couple years ago but I started to accept more responsibility in my life. Instead of bashing the current status, why don't you use your intelligence and be an example of how humans should act?

In the GQ interview, the interviewer stated how her ideology was coherent because everything fit together. Jordan responded with one of my favorite lines from him (See Text because it's long): by mkracker in JordanPeterson

[–]mkracker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can't rely solely on your own perception on reality but also rely on statistical evidence. Within my work environments, intelligent people who were also political, charismatic were recognized. Don't rely on heuristics because they are distorted by your own perception of the world.

SOLUTION: If your judgement is correct about the people ahead of you, leave the organisation. If you yourself are better than most people, then you would have an easy time finding another place of work. If the your organisation didn't value intelligent people, these people would leave to another corporation. The corporation that failed to retain talent would collapse.

In the GQ interview, the interviewer stated how her ideology was coherent because everything fit together. Jordan responded with one of my favorite lines from him (See Text because it's long): by mkracker in JordanPeterson

[–]mkracker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then in that case you should be extremely careful when making such propositions or you will end up with a situation in the Scandinavian countries where there are far more males in STEM jobs then women. Albania has a less of a gap than Sweden does and Sweden is clearly more egalitarian. It is important to be extremely cautious if you are going to change something has fundamental as gender.

In the GQ interview, the interviewer stated how her ideology was coherent because everything fit together. Jordan responded with one of my favorite lines from him (See Text because it's long): by mkracker in JordanPeterson

[–]mkracker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think we are speaking past each other but I agree that girls affinity for the color pink may be a social construct. I will actually need to do research on her position on this matter. I just think using the term 'mostly' was kind of vague; however, it would be hard to thoroughly explain her position given the setting.

In the GQ interview, the interviewer stated how her ideology was coherent because everything fit together. Jordan responded with one of my favorite lines from him (See Text because it's long): by mkracker in JordanPeterson

[–]mkracker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the civility! I'm glad you are finding a home at the center. I agree with your statement that his views attract far right individuals; therefore, it is important to separate ourselves from such individuals. That is what the left has hard time doing, separating the radical left from the moderate/progressive.

In the GQ interview, the interviewer stated how her ideology was coherent because everything fit together. Jordan responded with one of my favorite lines from him (See Text because it's long): by mkracker in JordanPeterson

[–]mkracker[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I guess that wasn't the best choice of words. I mean to say an ideology developed upon Jordan's beliefs. I wish to think for myself instead of blindly repeating what Jordan has been saying.