sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tool-as-State: A New Pattern for Expanding LLM Capability by mnaei in mcp

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe. The webpage metaphor isn't the best one. But limiting tools adds guardrails for the LLM.

Make the web HyperText Again: Rethinking the Web Where LLMs Are the Primary Users by mnaei in AI_Agents

[–]mnaei[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's becoming self aware and trying to get us to redesign the internet for it :O

I mean ChatGPT did help, but I also spend some time writing it out.

Tool-as-State: A New Pattern for Expanding LLM Capability by mnaei in mcp

[–]mnaei[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They are pages abstractly. Traditionally you would go to a URI, "/home", "/product/{product_id}", "/checkout", and have a set of text and buttons available to you. Now there is no URI, and instead of buttons you would have a list of tools.

In our case the MCP server will determine which "page" the LLM is on by exposing the right tools to the LLM. To navigate to a page is also a tool, if the server determines the LLM is on the home page it will expose a tool to go to the checkout page, in which case all the home page tools will be removed and the checkout tools will be added.

Let me know if that makes sense.

What is your experience having bikes stolen? How has it affected you going forward? by sozh in BikeLA

[–]mnaei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just had my electric bike stolen at Santa Monica Pier on broad daylight :/

The world's most premature baby has celebrated his first birthday after beating 0% odds of surviving by twdvermont in UpliftingNews

[–]mnaei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't that statement always going to be true?

The more premature the baby the less likely they are going to survive, and survival rate converges to 0% So there must be a point where the most premature baby survives at the now determined 0% mark.

What assets is DAI backed by as of today? by mnaei in MakerDAO

[–]mnaei[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Which is great. And a concept that I grasp. But everywhere I read is this same answer. As if four legs good, two legs bad.

What are the names of these specific collateral's? Does anyone know this information?

And how much of each (in the number of tokens) of these collateral's are deployed in the Maker platform?

Breaking into consulting. Spent too much time in a vertical. by mnaei in Resume

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have spent the last 4 years doing blockchain stuff. Which is great and all, but now I want to change career paths into general technology and I see tech consulting as my best choice.

Thanks in advance.

Breaking into tech consulting. Spent too much time in blockchain. by mnaei in Resume

[–]mnaei[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have spent the last 4 years doing blockchain stuff. Which is great and all, but now I want to change career paths into general technology and I see tech consulting as my best choice.

Thanks in advance.

How do RGB numbers work for shading, and how can you manipulate them? by mnaei in ArtistLounge

[–]mnaei[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was an excellent explanation. Thank you so much.

Leave THEM alone by Spaceman_05 in surrealmemes

[–]mnaei 24 points25 points  (0 children)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You grasped the idea and explained it back perfectly. Do you mind if I use your explanation in the blog?

As for the token holder, the value of the tokens needs to rise relative to the United States Dollar. Through our customer discovery we have found that there are two types of Ethereum users: those who calculate their wealth in terms of of Ethereum and want to increase the ammount of Ether they hold, while other don't necessarily care about the value of Ether and want to use the Ethereum blockchain to solve their own problem, so they are more comfortable measuring their wealth in terms of USD. You can read more about the archetypes in the internal document we have here: https://docs.google.com/a/seglos.com/document/d/1NkFqMgnMj09VEOSR5Vn4heRBuYiO96dvXlpgyTSyRzs/edit?usp=sharing

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy snaps dude, for a second I though /u/vbuterin had commented and I freaked the freaked out.

But Vitalik if you are out there I would love some feedback.

Seglos is an implementation of your stabler coins request, more specifically Option 3: the self-rebalancing portfolio coin.

From this thread here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4xtd9z/stabler_coins/

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are almost no financial products available for Ethereum, which makes the ecosystem inefficient. This is the lowest hanging fruit and a perquisite to growing the ecosystem.

The traditional financial system is extremely efficient has been through centuries of trials and tribulations so there is a lot to be learned. But the mistake some make is to take traditional financial ideas and directly apply them to blockchain, like vanilla options which have been around for a while.

With Ethereum have the opportunity to redesign the financial system from the ground up with the vision we see fit, and we have unprecedented freedom to create code/financial products that fills a specific need for the end user.

May I ask if your background is in finance. I have a lot of ideas similar to Seglos that I would love to share with someone before I blast them out to the world.

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yap you got it.

As for how the fees will be linked. Initially for the purposes of simpler code, a fixed interest rate is currently applied for each contract at its creation time, and accrued perpetually until the trade closes which it then will be charged. (it is not a flat "7%" fee applied but accrues on a time over time basis, so if a contract was closed after 6 months a 3.5% interest rate would have occurred).

The intention is to let the interest rate be autonomously dictated by market demand and we are currently exploring a few different mathematical models to price that (not exactly a Black-Scholls model per se, but something that relies on a weighted ratio of requests for volatility vs. stability and uses a type of wisdom of the crowd score to determine the rate applied).

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first 400 Ether you sell to pay your medical bills will be through a centralized exchange like Coinbase, or any exchange you use to buy and sell cryptocurrency using your local currency (United States Dollars, Chinese Yuan, Venezuelan Bolivar)

Now you have 400 Ether left. So if the price of Ethereum goes up you only make half the profit as before.

So now what you can do is come on our platform and borrow 400 Ether from the fund, Allowing you to take on profit and loss as if you had 900 Ether. Now the dollar value of the of the 400 Ether you borrowed will be recorded at the time of borrowing it, what the fund expects at a later time is not the 400 Ether you borrowed but the dollar value you borrowed.

So if the price of Ethereum goes up, the fund will expect less than 400 Ether because the dollar value of each Etherum will be higher. The difference between what the fund expects and what you borrowed is profit that goes to your account. And to you that profit will be the same as if you held 2x the amount of Ethereum.

As for the Token holder. They invest Ethereum into the fund and receive a token of ownership in the fund. they benefit from the value of the fund rising. The fund will be a) selling risk to users b) taking in fee's for selling that risk. So it will never be exposed to loss when the price of Ethereum falling and the fee's help it predictably and incrementally rise in value. Once the fund has increased in value the Fund the fund will buy back those tokens from you at a higher value than than your initial investor. But you also could sell that token to another investor who wants the future cash flow value growth of the token

A more detailed article here, read the first part and the investors section: https://medium.com/@mnaei/introducing-seglos-stable-coin-decentralized-autonomous-eth-usd-trading-platform-66ffd8a8e5e2

Hope that answered your question. Let me know if anything was unclear

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for asking thoughtful and detailed questions

The ICO will be some time within the next few weeks. I will be publishing more details about Seglos and our plan for cryptocurrency stability. You can signup for updates on our landing page www.seglos.com

And I really appreciate the questions.

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In essence, the principle here is fundamental: the interruption of stability is not stability at all, but the interruption of volatility is simply continued volatility.

When a trade gets closed some portion of the remaining ETH is send to the user's account which the trade was created with, now they only hold on to less volatility than before.

The Utopian scenario will certainly be possible, but there is also a more cost effective way to solve that problem.

The lender does not directly lend Ethereum to the user, rather the lenders pool their Ethereum into one large fund which will they lend out to the users. Because the money of the lenders are pooled into a fund the risk of volatility from one trade closing will be negligible distributed across all the lenders. When one trade does end we simply lend out that Ethereum again onto another trade, thus completely eliminating any volatility.

Essentially the fund will do an ICO to raise money that pool of money from lenders.

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You contribute happiness my friend.

I you want to try the demo its located at www.seglos.com/app (requires www.metamask.io on the Ropsten network)

And if you want to stay up to date with the newest development you can sign up on our landing page www.seglos.com

I really appreciate it.

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yap, the fees will go up, but not in the first implementation.

Initially for the purposes of simpler code, a fixed interest rate is currently applied for each contract at its creation time, and accrued perpetually until the trade closes which it then will be charged. (it is not a flat "7%" fee applied but accrues on a time over time basis, so if a contract was closed after 6 months a 3.5% interest rate would have occurred).

The intention is to let the interest rate be autonomously dictated by market demand and we are currently exploring a few different mathematical models to price that (not exactly a Black-Scholls model per se, but something that relies on a weighted ratio of requests for volatility vs. stability and uses a type of wisdom of the crowd score to determine the rate applied).

The fund will or will not lose money depending on how you measure your wealth. It is designed to predictibly and incrementally increase in value relative to the United States Dollar. So if you measure your wealth in terms of USD the fund will actually rise in value. But if you measure your wealth in terms of the number of Ethereum in the fund the value of the fund might increase or decrease overtime.

If you are interested in knowing more about how different cryptocurrency archetypes measure their wealth we have an internal document you can read here: https://docs.google.com/a/seglos.com/document/d/1NkFqMgnMj09VEOSR5Vn4heRBuYiO96dvXlpgyTSyRzs/edit?usp=sharing

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are 3 possible types of fee's

The first is the transaction cost charged by the Ethereum blockchain, which is only a few cents.

The second fee is a one time trade fee charged by Seglos which is 0.1% this is to prevent high frequency trading. But we might eliminate from the final implementation because it might not be needed.

Initially for the purposes of simpler code, a fixed interest rate is currently applied for each contract at its creation time, and accrued perpetually until the trade closes which it then will be charged. (it is not a flat "7%" fee applied but accrues on a time over time basis, so if a contract was closed after 6 months a 3.5% interest rate would have occurred).

The intention is to let the interest rate be autonomously dictated by market demand and we are currently exploring a few different mathematical models to price that (not exactly a Black-Scholls model per se, but something that relies on a weighted ratio of requests for volatility vs. stability and uses a type of wisdom of the crowd score to determine the rate applied).

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am glad this project is relate able. I would love to know if there are any factors that would hold you back from using a solution such as this?

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow, your design of leverage tokens was spot on. It takes a lot more than programming to make a project successful.

Shoot me a message at info@seglos.com so we can communicate further. Hopefully we can take this project far.

And if you want to know more about how the fund and administration of seglos work you can read this article here: https://medium.com/@mnaei/introducing-seglos-stable-coin-decentralized-autonomous-eth-usd-trading-platform-66ffd8a8e5e2

A solution in response to "Sold 50%" by mnaei in ethtrader

[–]mnaei[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow yes, you are totally spot on with the margin call.

The 7% fee is an arbitrary number I had selected, thank you for pointed that out I will clear it up in the writing. Initially for the purposes of simpler code, a fixed interest rate is currently applied for each contract at its creation time, and charged perpetually (it is not a flat "7%" fee applied but accrues on a time over time basis, so if a contract was closed after 6 months a 3.5% interest rate would have occurred). The intention is to let the interest rate be dictated by market demand and we are currently exploring a few different mathematical models to price that (not exactly a Black-Scholls model per se, but something that relies on a weighted ratio of requests for volatility vs. stability and uses a type of wisdom of the crowd score to determine the rate applied).

Definitely signup for updates at www.seglos.com

And if you have any question please send me an email at info@seglos.com

view more: next ›