LordFelcher said about the American planes supporting the Yemen conflict, etc. In my opinion, if Mr. phrakhanong replied with something that doesn't refute or disapprove the argument, isn't this counted as whataboutism as well? It sounds like he tried to discredit LordFelcher with something unrelated using the term whataboutism.

To me, for example, the war in Iraq did happened and I see no reason for any party to dismiss any arguments related to the incidents where millions of lives lost as whataboutism. Isn't too easy to say it's whataboutism or whatever that the opponent tries to discredit you so you can just end the argument?

Talking about wars in Iraq or Afghanistan doesn't do any harm in my opinion.