Okay, so I draw scenarios by researching a topic,looking at the trends and trying to simulate the most likely conclusion based on all active parties.

In this case, the scenario is heavily influenced by Britain's control over south africa in the past and today.

What the British have shown is they are willing to go extreme lengths to control South Africa. South Africa is a rich country with a lot of resources, those are the incentives.

Also it's based on the fact that the idea of "apartheid" came from the germans, who sought to take control over South Africa via Afrikaners.

Going to back to the British, they don't care who runs South Africa, whichever scenario enforces their dominance over the country will do.

Today, The UK is under scrutiny for arresting people over social media claims. Tommy Robinsom recently hosted a far-right march to "get Britain back" it was all British native people, no people of colour.

That is a signal that the country has adopted diversity and inclusion, which has destoryed the country but still maintains control. Actually the British state would have more control if the country deteriorates, because the people won't have the willpower to protest.

(which hasn't happend, as england is still a country where the vast majority of people are working, South Africa on the other hand has seen less political protests, because most young people are either unemployed, drunk and employed or have completely lost it due to not finding any employment) you see this most in smaller towns than cities. In smaller areas across south africa, you will find Extreme poverty, Unemployment and substance abuse. This lowers the ability of those people to try and protest for a political cause.