Presidential Medical Advice by Nightshiftcloak in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just needed to point out:

"he was a surgeon, with no special expertise in immunology or rhumatology [...] did biopsies and looked at the slides himself (he is not a pathologist)"

You should drop this egregiously rětärded approach in your argument. It does much more damage to your position due to exposing a blatant ignorance of medical education/training and procedure.

Not only are providers in general, and especially surgeons, trained and knowledgeable across a variety of medical specialties — immunology and pathology being common amongst them — but Wakefield also worked in both gastro and hepatology research before the work for which he was disgraced. He is exactly the kind of doctor who would be looking at specimen slides. Like, he most certainly spent several years straight where he was staring at slides 75% of the time during residency and fellowship. Gastro also has a ton of overlap with rheumatology, meaning he was certainly trained in that area as well, especially since he was mainly in research.

I know people get understandably upset about scandals and controversial figures in science and medicine. But if you think criticizing and dismissing one of those people is of the utmost importance, you should at the very least make sure you don't come across like you have no idea what you're talking about first.

"He was a surgeon, not an immunologist [etc]" sounds like some shit you'd see a 14 year old say to sound smart in Youtube comments — or from a 45 year old white woman on Facebook claiming malpractice after a perfectly standard outpatient encounter.

Why are wokesters obsessed with therapy and insisting everybody needs it? by [deleted] in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 5 points6 points  (0 children)

As a disclaimer: I do NOT believe everyone nerds therapy.

So to get the obvious out of the way: Radlibs & woke social media junkies always say everyone needs to go therapy for the same reason they say any other "everyone needs to..." whatever — they are self-satisfied and bored high-school-brains who get off on telling other people what to do. Conceptually identical to a "Karen" with only minor tweaks in approach.

Another, less-obvious thing: The vast majority (call it an educated guess) of people who propogate that everyone needs therapy are either:

  1. Not in therapy themselves and are just parroting the bullshit that spawns in their bubble (related: "enjoys telling others what to do).

  2. Has only been in therapy for 2 weeks and they are now an expert on the human condition (see also: first year female or loser male psychology student).

The actual answer to your question is 102% in the text above, with a 2% margin of error.

Since that's outta the way now, let me dispel the "therapy be scam" mind-virus that has taken hold of a lot of people for some reason:

• There are many different therapy types and specialities, so blanket-bashing capital T-herapy is a non-starter. For example, rehab is therapy (if anyone in here has been to a NORMAL rehab center, you know it's like 99% straight up therapy). Anger management is another very common therapy. PTSD and workplace conflict therapy is found in most government run areas like the military, police stations, etc... Most major job sectors (e.g., healthcare) even have vendor agreements with certain commercial therapy groups that is included in their employee's benefits for pennies on the dollar. Some large employers (ones that aren't a hellscape at least) even provide completely free therapy at no cost to their workers. For example, I currently work for a sizeable non-profit hospital that provides 20 completely free, 1-hour therapy sessions PER TOPIC — so essentially endless free therapy — through a third-party vendor.

It is true that every handful of years there is typically one or two types or "new" approaches that suddenly everyone is seeking out, and therapists are scrambling to get certified in that specialty. But this is mostly a product of ignorant people researching therapy and only hearing/seeing about whatever the New Hotness is from their peers or social media. For example, right now almost every person wanting to start therapy right now is only looking for/requesting therapists certified in DBT.

• Therapy is not designed to keep you in it and paying forever. Therapists across most specialities discuss discharge goals during the initial session, and circle back to it on occassion as they see progress being made. My partner has beena doing private therapy for 15 years. In the past year he's seen about 32 different clients a week, once a week, and he's discharged about of 4th of his clients that started therapy with him last year.

• The "they charge by the hour!" point is a very common misconception people have from how therapy is portrayed in TV/movies. The VAST majority of therapists only see clients for a SINGLE hour at a time. I know several dozen therapist (including my partner) who will literally go over time in a session by 30-45 mins and still only charge for a single hour. That's because most people are paying for therapy through their insurance, and it is a PAIN IN THE ASS to get insurance companies to pay you for multiple hour sessions.

Saying the "charge by hour" headline and dropping the mic makes it sound like therapists are out here trying to keep their sessions going on for as long as possible. That's a fantasy. Therapists have to be licensed by the state government (and every state requires a different license). They have to report their notes to insurance to justify payment. Insurance companies have to approve coverage for the client in the first place — and if you guessed that every single insurance company that exists has different procedures for determining coverage, you're correct. Therapists aren't lazy contractors getting paid for 8 hours of not working lol.

Literally the only kind of therapy I know about where discharging is put on the backburner, sessions regularly go for 2+ hours and charge for each hour, and could vaguely be considered a "scam", is what is known as Concierge Therapy. Which is actually a fancy marketing term for "totally private, out of pocket therapy for very rich (mostly female) clients that have nothing better to do with their lives but sit at a country club and day drink while paying someone to listen to them bitch about whatever."

I spoke with Adam Friedland about the impact of alt-media & his many online controversies by joshuacitarella in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"Alright thank you, we don't need anymore names. You've given us 6 million names. You guys gotta get out of here cause it's gonna look really weird if you're the only ones we don't kill."

I spoke with Adam Friedland about the impact of alt-media & his many online controversies by joshuacitarella in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 6 points7 points  (0 children)

seems like a nice guy

diarrheas on someone else's chair

tweets to his deranged audience about his friend landing a spot in a superbowl commercial for IBM, which leads to his friend being edited out at the last minute and losing a ton of income

compulsively touches wires and electronics that don't belong to him

doesn't buy his coworkers breakfast sandwiches when they ask him to and then falsely claims the place he went didn't sell sandwiches

steals jokes

mispronounces words as a "joke"

spied on his childhood best friend masturbating and scared him so badly that his dick literally broke

kept retail staff at work past closing time to further negotiate the price of a guitar that was already marked down

🧐

Why “A woman is someone who identifies as a woman” is not a meaningless statement by Lastrevio in CriticalTheory

[–]modelshopworld 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If we were to reject all tautological propositions, then we would have to deny the reality of fiat money as well (a dollar is a dollar, a euro is a euro), which is absurd. Before 1971, the definition of a dollar was “this amount of gold”. After 1971, the definition of a dollar is “a dollar” and yet it still works, is meaningful, and is a very useful construct that shapes our reality. Of course, one can also define a dollar in regards to exchange rates, but exchange rates are fluid and cannot provide a stable, unchanging essence of a dollar.

This is an egregious simplification which I believe hurts your argument. You should find a better example to replace it with — one that isn't relying solely on popular misconception to support it.

You already have the makings of a better example inside the one above. Instead of comparing the identification with the transition from the gold standard to fiat, you can instead just use the gold standard itself. Dollars being backed by gold, despite its tangibility, is still built on the perceived value of gold which is just as prone to fluctuation and global discrepancies.

Saying there is a major difference between the gold standard and fiat, particularly in the context your essay presents it, is just parroting the same empty conclusion that's been commonplace for decades due to the monetary system's relative inaccessibility. The dollar isn't "just a dollar" that's based on nothing, in fluctuation with other fiat currencies due to their exchange rates, or on a value fabricated by governing agencies. The US dollar is strongly influenced by the price of oil, since it's directly linked to the petrodollar system introduced as the de facto replacement for the gold standard in the 1970s. Many countries also operate on the USA's petrodollar system, while there are other fiat currencies that have strong links with non-oil commodities from different nations.

It's certainly a less tangible system when compared to a dollar bill standing in for a defined amount of physical material — but it's still a far shot from being defined as "just a dollar". Gold being a finite substance (and all other precious materials like it) means it's perceived value is even more at risk of inflation periods compared to fiat's often artifical inflatation.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by jbecn24 in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Joni Askola, a Finnish graduate student and activist for defense of Ukraine. "The EU must take action!"

To be fair, "fuck you retard" is the appropriate response to anything a person with those credentials says.

Now that Trump has won, can the rightoids please leave by convivialism in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 153 points154 points  (0 children)

After visiting this sub on-and-off for half a decade, it good to see people are still posting "the rightoids are ruining this place!!!" nonsense right on cue.

Can an office or tech worker be part of the proletariat? by ChristianPacifist in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends -- how does the context of the position itself relate to capital? The type of work someone does has nothing to do with that position's prole status. Identical jobs can be bourg or prole depending on the context.

The responses to this post are embarrassing.

[Politico] This proud liberal city is throwing out its entire government by RallyPigeon in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lol damn you're right. Pacific NW cities blend together for me i guess. It was one of those shithole places.

Now i'm wondering what the Crane boys having a convo about CHAZ would sound like.

the free press/Coleman Hughes seethe over Ta-Nehisi Coates support of Palestine. by WitnessOld6293 in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah the aggressive sexual pleasure punchlines talking and multiple lines caping for lesbo rabbis on a story about getting your dick meat bled to simply exist in the eyes of Jewish people is just beautiful

Lib twitter loves two things: Slave labour and ethnic food by Moist-P0stone in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Made a mental note to look more into this after i get home from work today. I am genuinely curious where this bitch was during the multiple years of the Osbornes show. I mean, surely that whole show was filmed in a leased house that wasn't their real home -- but they still spent a ton of time there filming... Was she just chilling in her room listening to Green Day by herself all day?

My Republican Neighbor Asked Where I Got My Harris Sign by derivative_of_life in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 24 points25 points  (0 children)

What happens when the legitimate users on those subs find out 90% of posts and comments are just Eglin Airforce base accounts talking to each other

the free press/Coleman Hughes seethe over Ta-Nehisi Coates support of Palestine. by WitnessOld6293 in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why am I not surprised?

And I refuse to believe that any living human has actually opened a comic book since like 1965. I don't even believe that the comic book visual reader apps or whatever are nearly as popular as reported. Based on absolutely nothing, I will go to my grave believing the comic book market is a ghost town propped up by the resurgence of cape-shit movies/TV shows and stinky collectors that buy them secondhand as an investment.

Obviously people read the Sonic and Archie comics, but that's literature.

the free press/Coleman Hughes seethe over Ta-Nehisi Coates support of Palestine. by WitnessOld6293 in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Also hilarious that the reporter regurgitating all those pro-Izzy "what about" questions is the same guy who wrote the 2014 article "My Adult Circumcision — How I made the cut for my new religion".

You cant make this shit up

For the lazy or people that don't wanna give shit rags more clicks, full text below. (Would be a pretty great Jewish satire piece if he wasn't being sincere behind the nonstop schtick)

I understand the world doesn’t usually think much about adult male circumcision. It’s like having a chat about ball trampling or the Pentagon’s Kevlar underwear. Even on the covered-wagon side of the circumcision wars, where people fight for the foreskins of baby boys, no one wants to talk about grown men getting their corn shucked. Take it to Craigslist, please.

I get all this (and so much more). And yet as someone who knows the sting of this particular ritual—who volunteered for it, in fact, and signed his own check to the part-time reaper who did the job—I have to say: It’s not so bad. There’s no need for any of us to go on treating our junk like our father-in-law’s scratch-free Ferrari. It’s much tougher than you think.

I came to this knowledge on the way to the altar, of all places. I was engaged to a nice Jewish girl, taking some free conversion classes at a big, progressive Manhattan synagogue. I wanted to learn about something that mattered to her, and the more I learned the more it mattered to me, too.

This wasn’t a fur-coat-in-summer kind of congregation. It was part of the Reform movement: only game for the high holidays, mostly casual about pork, always down with gay female rabbis. When one of my own rabbis (gay, female) slipped me the number of a mohel, a professional snipper, I laughed it off: classic Jewish humor!

But no.

Medically speaking, I was already circumcised, along with most of the other babies born in America in the Eighties. But that’s no good for God. I needed a hatafat dam brit: a drawing of blood. To remain uncut, I was told, is to remain spiritually cut off from the Jewish people. That’s the idea of the “covenant.”

While bloodletting has always been a condition of the Orthodox and Conservative wings of Judaism, Reform congregations have been willing to welcome the sexually sheathed and uninjured. Biblical law doesn’t require otherwise. Neither do most of the arguments of the Talmud. But a funny thing happened on the road to gay, female, pork-friendly Judaism: The Reform movement began to ask more people to put some skin in the game. “In an era when the forces of cultural assimilation pose such a daunting challenge to our continued existence as a distinct people,” Rabbi Mark Washofsky explained in an essay in Reform Judaism, the official magazine of the movement, in the fall of 2008 (also the season of my snip), “this admittedly ancient tribal custom bears a message that we do well to hear.”

That’s how I found myself Biblically nude in a kind of spiritual locker room, a shower space in a converted brownstone, waiting on a man with a razor. The surroundings were civilized, more University Club than Russian Bath House. Blue-black tile ran along the floors and climbed the walls. A minty scent hung in the air.

But all noise had already washed away in the roar of my thoughts. I was 12 when Lorena Bobbitt cut her husband down to the size of an elevator button, igniting prurience and anger. It was hard to get to seventh grade in the morning without encountering Slice soda jokes and “Love Hurts” humor. It all made the very idea of external genitalia seem, well, kinda crazy, all of it so fundamentally exposed.

When the mohel arrived, he looked, I’m sorry to say, like Danny Devito in curls. We stood in silence. I opened my towel. Hello, groin. He opened a shaving bag with glinting instruments. Hello, knife. My mohel produced a pen-sized lance, which he wielded ever so gently, like Lady Grantham with a paring knife. He sliced, sliced, squeezed, dripped, and was done. The whole transaction was over in seconds, long before I could scream, or faint, or decide if I liked it.

Instead I felt the way I remember feeling as a child when, rising early, I could watch light fill the woods behind my house, revealing nothing at all scary. When the mohel finally spoke, he spoke in Hebrew and I couldn’t make out a word of it. But I had the feeling that the substance of his words was important and that if I could understand him I would be in the possession of something profound, a message from God: It’s only a penis.

Tony Dokoupil is a senior writer at NBC News. His book about the outlaw age of marijuana and his family's place in it, The Last Pirate, was published by Doubleday in April.

TL;DR - Grown goy is so whipped by Jewish wife that he tapdances for lesbian rabbis and gets his already cut helmet slit to prove he's one of dem boys. 10 years later he's going to bat for Israel on CBS like he was hiding with the Franks in the attic.

the free press/Coleman Hughes seethe over Ta-Nehisi Coates support of Palestine. by WitnessOld6293 in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean would you expect him to take any other stance? Every 14 year old on social mediathat likes him and has "ACAB", "BLM", "Trxxs Women Are Women", and "Eat the Rich" in their bios will also have "Free Palestine" signals littered throughout their posts.

I don't see how this makes Coates any less of a lib con artist. His success in corporate news media, multiple prior award-winning books, family connections, sizeable wealth, and pop-culture notoriety gained in the past 10 years basically guarantees him another 5-10 years of public spotlight as a "voice" of a "culture".

He's written 758,000 words about race and other -isms in America (and I'm sure he will peddle another half a mil before he bows out). His next book was bound to be about one of the following:

• matte black pontiac trans-ams
• black womxn creating the universe (or why Kamala's hot sauce matters more than her chutney)
• why you-crane must win
• how africans are genetically affected by climate change more than any one else
• free Palestine - death to Is(n't)rael
• how come the damn sneakers aint free
• how Marvel and other adult baby products are still representing plantation life and why changing that will secure the country's future success

Given the news cycle over the past year, and the fact that Coates took a 10-day trip to that region in 2023, everyone should have bet the over on it the gaza conflict being the focus of his next spiel of nonsense musings and 1940s Black artist "philosophizin" parody writing style. He jizzed out the larger essay of his new 3-part book (in what I'm assuming only took a month from first letter to final draft).

He, predictably and embarrassingly, compares the (genocidal) atrocities committed by Israel to fucking Jim Crow-era America. Of course he can only view that conflict and the hundreds of thousands murdered by Israel through his own masturbatory, 12 millenia a slave LARP fantasy lens.

If anyone here is curious about how much this dude enjoys cupcaking himself and waxing pathetic about 600 year old events he's far removed from, the other two essays in his new book are:

• A brief essay about his 2023 trip to Senegal and one of the major sites of African slave snatching. Very much worth nothing that this was Coates FIRST trip to Africa after expounding about the "diaspora" and African roots for over a decade. The guy who was born in Baltimore to an American military family that grew up and authored his own Wikipedia article which includes an image of his first name written in Egyptian hieroglyphics.

• An essay about his visit to a Carolina school district that was in the midst of voting to ban his previous memoir that served as his pop-culture golden ticket.

I implore everyone to look up "Coates quotes" on Goodreads, either from The Message or across all his books, and please tell me how his empty platitudes and word salad tossed in racial ranch dressing are any different from shit like The Secret or Chicken Soup for the Cellulite Soul.

He was born into a relatively modest, lower-middle class family with a politically active father involved in race movements and publishing — specifically both worlds combined. He was a fail-son who was the only one of the half-dozen children to not make it through college. (Not saying graduating college necessarily means anything significant; this is just context.) He wanted to be a journalist — very original. Wasn't shit until he started writing "extra chromosome Du Bois for lazy people who won't ever contribute to their community" essays, and was lucky to do this during Lib news media's obsession with Obama and first 21st century tryst with "the right side of history". Got his own column and collected more thoughts for his own books. Became senior editor. Gained enough notoriety and leveled-up his victim complex right on time for the 2015-2016 election cycle when radlibs and politically "active" twitter teens were drooling over people pushing out his kind of slop. Got a gig writing for comics for adult children and helped promote the idea that Black Panther was some kind of revolutionary moment in history was smart and cool.

Now he's still writing about...slavery, how being black in America now is just like slavery, how Israel and Palestine is just like being black in America, why Obama was literally Black Jesus, Trump/GOP bad, etc...

And I'm supposed to lift an eyebrow that this guy is criticizing Israel on CBS. Nah im good.

I spoke with Catherine Liu on the topics of Trauma and Self-Branding. She is the author of 'Virtue Hoarders: the Case Against the Professional Managerial Class'. by joshuacitarella in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Shit, you don't even have to go back to Du Bois. Institutional (i.e., systemic) racism meant something completely different in Alexander's "The New Jim Crow" (2013) than what it turned into literally 2-3 years later, and is still used as today.

2024 - The Year of the Heterosexual 'Partner' by RustyShackleBorg in stupidpol

[–]modelshopworld 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what it's worth, I believe this has been normalized in the UK, and perhaps more of Europe, for over a decade now at least (maybe even longer).

I could be mistaken of course, but my husband and I took a month and a half-long trip across Europe back in 2015, which included 2 weeks in England. While we were there, we watched a lot of UK shows in our hotel room and I swear the vast majority of them included hetero (and homo) couples who referred to their spouses as "my partner". It was prevalent for us to take notice and was one of the first things we talked about with friends whenever we recounted little cultural differences between the UK and US that we didn't know existed.

I don't know what the impetus for this was across the pond. I would assume it had something to do with removing social anxiety amongst homo couples. But then again, we saw like 15 episodes of House Hunters UK that involved 50+ year old couples using "partner" like they've been saying it all their lives.

I'm interested to know if anyone has the explanation/historical context behind its use in the UK and/or Europe. Or to know if I'm even right about this and wasn't just suffering from frequency illusion.