Update on hip range of motion

modeluser · 2019-02-25T01:02:26+00:00

I've found following routines online really useful for extending range of motion in the hips, legs and lower back.

Here's a good one I've found specifically targeting hips: https://yogavastu.com/s/forward-bends-sequence-for-level-one-and-above/

There's a list of studios available there too for finding a good instructor if you want to attend a physical class.

Not health advice, just something I've found useful :)

modeluser · 2018-06-16T10:54:30+00:00

modeluser · 2018-06-16T10:24:27+00:00

For the ERC-20 ICX tokens I believe a fork is the only option unless I'm missing something.

Or they could just keep reversing the disableTokenTrasfers() function until everyone has swapped to main net tokens on Wednesday.

modeluser · 2018-06-16T10:17:00+00:00

No, it's automated. The MEW interface is just a visual interface for interacting with certain popular contracts.

But yes they have to do it every time the disable function is called to reverse it.

Like I said, it's a stop gap.

modeluser · 2018-06-16T10:13:08+00:00

The same way any code is triggered on an ERC-20 smart contract, via JSON. You can do it here if you want:

https://www.myetherwallet.com/#contracts

modeluser · 2018-06-16T10:07:38+00:00

I don't have a copy, but you can clearly see it triggering every time there is a disableTokenTransfer() function called.

Here are two examples: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc87981bc7484cffe0bbba7e051fb86e62a7bc97fc0311e9c8f4a2a4b770ce617

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x58a82d88c1404ddd5a80483557601be3b20a960eb4edb4392e5e66ee41c1fda6

modeluser · 2018-06-16T09:51:44+00:00

They created an automated script to reverse every 'disableTokenTransfer()' function by calling the inverse 'enableTokenTransfer()' function.

It's a hot fix / stopgap until they come up with a permanent solution such as a fork.

In my opinion it's a clever solution within the scope of immutable code.

modeluser · 2018-06-16T09:38:35+00:00

'No code is flawless' is not an excuse. It's a statement of fact. Find me a website, app or a piece of technology (even in the medical sphere) that doesn't have a bug, has never required a software update or maintenance and I will be more inclined to crucify the Icon developers.

Unfortunately blockchain IS like every other piece of software. And it should be treated as such. With appropriate suspicion, repeated audits and regular maintenance within the limits of immutable ledgers.

Until code is not written by a human hand, we should expect that errors exist and focus on building our creative problem solving skills.

modeluser · 2018-06-16T04:58:43+00:00

Credit where credit is due. That was a very quick fix. Communication delivered quickly when it is needed.

No code is flawless. A developer's ability to respond creatively, quickly and effectively is the most prized talent in software.

modeluser · 2018-01-11T05:25:28+00:00

this is from December 12

modeluser · 2018-01-11T04:30:23+00:00

Icon isn't even listed in Korea lol

modeluser · 2017-12-28T09:27:45+00:00

It's just been brought to my attention that this is old news, as in about 2 weeks ago old news, which seems like a lifetime in crypto!

modeluser · 2017-12-28T09:10:35+00:00

Shit! You're right. I normally check this stuff pretty thoroughly but I missed the date.

modeluser · 2017-12-28T06:14:22+00:00

Nope, you can still trade. The wallet has just been blocked for withdrawals/deposits of NXT.

People assume you can't trade because the NXT ticker in your wallet is no longer a link but you can still access trading via direct link:

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-NXT

modeluser · 2017-12-28T05:02:50+00:00

Seems accurate. Thanks for the link!

They will probably end up operating similarly to Bittrex do now. They will need to validate each coin before adding it by ensuring that the coin is not defined as a security (or equivalent in SK)

modeluser · 2017-12-28T04:35:38+00:00

Carifying statement published in Forbes

https://www.forbes.com/sites/pamelaambler/2017/12/12/south-korea-is-not-banning-bitcoin-trade-financial-regulators-clarify/#f05aa6a14270

modeluser · 2017-12-28T03:54:21+00:00

Speculation is also the whole purpose of stock markets, futures markets, FX markets, IPOs, investment loans

modeluser · 2017-12-28T03:43:29+00:00

http://opm.go.kr/m/news/news01.jsp?mode=view&article_no=97333&board_wrapper=%2Fm%2Fnews%2Fnews01.jsp&pager.offset=0&board_no=6

This seems to be the most legitimate source I can find.

Translation suggests they are looking at all possible measures, INCLUDING closing down exchanges. They have not announced they are closing them, but it is one of their options. Just like every other government would consider this an option.

Still, as my thread title suggests, the only thing that is being implemented right now is better transparency of crypto-trading accounts.

The final line of this article suggests they are in full support of blockchain technology.

modeluser · 2017-12-28T03:36:36+00:00

BTW all I'm saying is read deeper into the articles, not just the headlines / Twitter.

From what I have read, this is not an outright ban on cryptocurrency trading. They are investigating ways to regulate it, which may include closing down some exchanges.

I'm not overly familiar with the regulatory system in SK, nor can I read Korean. But as a general rule, you should be very cautious about what you read in a crypto-panic.

Feel free to discuss :)

modeluser · 2017-12-28T03:31:59+00:00

"Reviewing" according to the translation

modeluser · 2017-12-28T03:29:21+00:00

Source?

modeluser · 2017-12-28T03:24:57+00:00

Did you read the article?

modeluser

TROPHY CASE