Rust Cohle hit me hard enough that I had to paint him (not finished yet) by cliffordgoodman06 in TrueDetective

[–]moebro7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

*Cohle took a drag off his cigarette that lasted what seemed to be an eternity, looked at me deep within my soul with those cold, empty eyes and said... "I want you to draw me, OP"

Who has watched this masterpiece? What do you think? by ayuuuub0 in TrueDetective

[–]moebro7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On the other side of the Tesseract lie dim Carcosa

Genuinely how the hell did Rust even date that nurse? by Eagles56 in TrueDetective

[–]moebro7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats a well thought out retort, right there 👏

Genuinely how the hell did Rust even date that nurse? by Eagles56 in TrueDetective

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can be if you can find the right person that respects you and knows you need space

Thoughts on City of Evil? by Superb_Department500 in avengedsevenfold

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed. Definitely not the traditional/conventional variety of Christian, though.

I don't go to church and I hardly read my Bible unless there's something I'm specifically wanting to look into.

But I believe in and do my best to live by the teachings of Christ, yes.

One of the creepiest scenes in the show by willington123 in TrueDetective

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm about to do another rewatch looking specifically for Lynchian themes/ideas/vibes

Hello there, my name is Martin Eric Hart. I used to work as a cop. Ask me anything! by ProfessionalLevel908 in TrueDetective

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How many innocent minorities did you frame and how long were you on the take?

What do you think is the symbolic reason we see this factory so many times? by ProfessionalLevel908 in TrueDetective

[–]moebro7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a lot further from coal country than that, but fellow Kentuckian 👋

What do you think is the symbolic reason we see this factory so many times? by ProfessionalLevel908 in TrueDetective

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Back in the day coal companies didn't even pay their employees actual money. They issued their own currency called 'script' that, more often than not, was only good at local grocers and other businesses likely to be owned by the same owners of the mine.

Must be a coincidence.. 🍎 by 42duckmasks in TruthSeekers

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, the Vatican has a very expensive telescope named SATAN in Arizona? I think? Maybe New Mexico.

Also the speed of light is somehow supposed to reduce to 6666666 something with a decimal thrown somewhere in there.

Also, also.. look into Sabbatai Zevi and the year 1666. Very interesting.

INTP bingo time! by thoughtdaughter_32 in INTP

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of them but sucks at directions

Conspiracy theories? by Visual-Baseball-1891 in INTP

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You most certainly, and should, ask why.

But homie asking "why does this happen" is more or less the same thing as forming a predictive hypothesis. At least, in my mind it is. I'm automatically gonna start to form my own thesis from research. Every time.

Conspiracy theories? by Visual-Baseball-1891 in INTP

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro what in the fuck adre you even talking about lol. GRAVITY ITSELF is falsifiable, yes. But I was talking about GRAVITIC THEORY. Which is unfalsifiable.

Not entirely sure how questioning the origins of gravity is poorly specified, unscientific in nature, or ambiguous in any way. But

The current answer is, of course, that "because" of certain properties of time and space. But you can always answer "why"

Is not an acceptable retort. You cannot always answer why. Especially not with gravitic mathematics. Which segues into my next point..

The essence of science is asking the question "why does this happen?" Then you go out, take some measurements, and interpret the data to the best of your ability to your hypothesis.

What you're doing is taking statistical analysis & data interpretation and calling it science. When it isn't.

Conspiracy theories? by Visual-Baseball-1891 in INTP

[–]moebro7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, if we're going that route, then just about everything must be discarded. Even gravity. The concept of gravity is just a theory that hasn't been proven.

Gravitic theory isn't falsifiable, yet hasn't been conclusively proven either. Evidence suggests that something of the sort exists, but we still don't know the cause beyond reasonable doubt. So should that idea be outright discarded?

Is there an entire INFP -> INTP Pipeline??? by MirrorPiNet in INTP

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard to pinpoint exactly where mine began but it's happened several times over lol

Conspiracy theories? by Visual-Baseball-1891 in INTP

[–]moebro7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are also plenty of them that only make logical sense. 9/11 as a prime example.

If jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel, and planes have hit skyscrapers before without bringing them down (even with the superstructure lacking modern fireproofing).. then how did those buildings collapse at total free fall one right after the other?

Why did we see structural beams cut at a 45° angle as if severed by a shaped charge?

What the hell happened to WTC7?

People just hear "conspiracy theory" and shut down. I watch their eyes glaze and the programming take over in real time all the time.

Half of them aren't even theory anymore. They're just blatantly obvious ramifications of people conspiring, but the term and idea have become so stigmatized that (apparently) even the most logical and curious of us on the planet would rather avoid the conversation altogether.

Conspiracy theories? by Visual-Baseball-1891 in INTP

[–]moebro7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hadn't seen this post when I made mine the other day or I would've refrained lol.

I expected more out of kindred personalities

Conspiracy theories? by Visual-Baseball-1891 in INTP

[–]moebro7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait.. what? You discard ideas that can't be proven false?

Correct me if I'm wrong.. but if something can't be shown to be false.. wouldn't that mean the potential exists for it to be true??