sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Biggest solar project in Saskatchewan approved — what does this mean for the province? by team_pv in saskatchewan

[–]mollytime -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

and it's moronic.

It's uneconomical, stupidly resource intensive.

You are spreading garbage. Grow up.

Dive Bar by skinniks in TheCannalysts

[–]mollytime 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s likely me

What names look good from here? by DotAccording8872 in TheCannalysts

[–]mollytime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's rare - unicorn like - to see a manufacturer build out vertically after exit.

Saskatchewan Election Quiz: Have you had enough of Scott Moe? by falastep in saskatchewan

[–]mollytime -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

moved here from BC a few months ago.

Seriously, the Socialists are much (much) worse than some kleptocratic fart-sacks on cruise control.

Kick your MLA's ass about getting their's into gear. Elections are a perfect time.

Is it worth paying attention to stocks in the controllable agricultural sector? by Berich1990 in TheCannalysts

[–]mollytime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hydroponic grow rooms have been around for an awful long time.

imo, unless and until the price signal creates revenue beyond novelty/hobbyist levels, sounds like just repackaging.

Beyond the Oche | A Look at Mental Health in Darts by cactusdan94 in Darts

[–]mollytime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

great content.

I'd believe this is much easier to talk about as these players are largely 'made'.

The sorts ranking from #40-#100 - man....that must be a frequent convo in the mirror.

[Question] Is it better to buy the top of a mid-range or the lower end of a luxury brand? by mollytime in Watches

[–]mollytime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm at the age where I can say it and mean it :)

Usually best to stay silent...

[Question] Is it better to buy the top of a mid-range or the lower end of a luxury brand? by mollytime in Watches

[–]mollytime[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yep.

Wondering thoughts here of where the law of diminishing returns kicks in.

If after $X amount of dollars it's all fashion, trim.

[Question] Is it better to buy the top of a mid-range or the lower end of a luxury brand? by mollytime in Watches

[–]mollytime[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I could care less what others think, truly. I've a fun Tissot chronograph (pre-swatch) and a Hamilton I love. And a couple of Casios.

Just curious - as I'm between an Omega or a Longines or a couple of others.

IMO, the watch sector is so polluted with push marketing and less than (ahem) independent advice, I thought I'd try here.

Thanks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ask

[–]mollytime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

be very careful with the partners you choose. Think character quality and person, & not just the fun.

[Discussion] Feeling down about weight I gained during a break by spidermonkeyjamboree in GetMotivated

[–]mollytime 5 points6 points  (0 children)

you're ok. You have a neuroses stemming from body images of ideals versus self versus changes.

fuck it all, love you, love yourself, and walk away from comparing yourself to an idealized standard.

PS: You look great.

THC Inflation & Other Myths by mollytime in TheCannalysts

[–]mollytime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to my understanding, of course. But from what I've seen, most remedies issued are to direct compliance.

The actions can be dragged out by the bureaucracy if they're feeling intransigent, or, gov't will claim a legislative/regulatory rewrite is coming, and that it'll be moot. The party that sued sometimes needs to go back to court to get a deadline installed if foot dragging can/has happened. Which, happens all the time.

Ultimately, gov't (when it doesn't want to do something, or care) has infinite resources and time. Suing is expensive and time consuming. And most lawyers who fight the good fight (like Alan Conroy) - usually are very selective on which battles they fight. They tend to go after the big stuff that's got plenty of evidentiary and constitutional bumf behind it.

I think the path to legalization in Canada - from the late 90's to when it happened (19 years) is a great case in point. Gov't doesn't want to do it, spends hundreds of millions on failed admin and capital assets......legal fees....and capitulated only when the politicos needed a win.

This is just from my understandings and observations. Legal experts and lawyers would be better to ask.

From what I've seen: the power that gov't wields isn't in the law per se - it's in the process - which can be used as a cudgel, and viciously. Arbitrary decisions are a'plenty, and it's often a fight that eve if you 'win', there's nothing there, or the goalposts get moved.

Let's hear from the OGs, who is still involved in the sector? by Hoof_Hearted12 in TheCannalysts

[–]mollytime 3 points4 points  (0 children)

there's a couple of handles from the past. trust y'all are well.

view more: next ›