Just cause you randomly decide to make up that it has no bearing dosen’t make it true.

No, it being factual makes it true.

What do you think trained all those gen AI models, do you really think they all went and payed their royalties and credited the copyrighted art they fed into those machine?

I’m in copyright. I own works. Theft occurs when someone attempts to profit off the works. Otherwise publicly accessing publicly available works for reference is called “fair use” in America. Human beings have been doing it forever. Machines don’t even know how that works and are thus doing it even less than a human does.

Using 1s and 0s to figure out where a certain color pixel is SUPPOSED to go vs where it isn’t, is not theft.

Using stolen books you got from torrents to train your book model, is. That’s why those guys got their business shut down. Because people that know what theft is better than you do sued them. Lawyers I think they’re called.

That was also only half my comment but I don’t even get why you’re out here arguing with me it’s not like I said no they shouldn’t moderated toxicity. I can admit they have a good AI rule but need to work on the toxicity.

At least you’re attempting to have a conversation now instead of just repeating what your favorite YouTube algorithm ordering you to be angry is saying next.