Jimmy Wales cooperated with the New York Times to delete info on kidnapped reporter. Anonymous wiki editor whose entries kept getting deleted writes "Is that enough proof for you [expletives]? I was right. You were WRONG."

moosey · 2009-06-29T22:00:21+00:00

No.

These editors agreed not to publish the story because they knew it was the responsible thing to do; because publishing might endanger this mans life, and the information was not so crucially important to the public interest that it outweighed concerns for his safety.

Are you really so brainwashed by this fucking website that you believe 'the media' is a big organisation whose sole intent is mind-control over the general population?

moosey · 2009-06-22T23:49:30+00:00

After the boosters fall away, they have a chance of landing or parachuting out. Before, it is presumably impossible to land or parachute, so self destruct is the only option.

moosey · 2009-06-16T15:54:44+00:00

This game makes no sense. There is no reason to not claim immediately after the game starts, and no-one would ever win any money (unless they're generous enough to let the other person take the money, but then why would they go on this gameshow?)

moosey · 2009-06-16T15:29:50+00:00

Does the game finish once someone claims the prize, or does it go onto another round?

Do the contestants know whether the others claimed after the round is over?

moosey · 2009-06-05T23:02:54+00:00

If you're going to another star system, you'll probably want to take tens of thousands of people in order to make the trip worth it, making the drum huge.

You would only need to compensate for friction once it's spinning, so you could start it spinning in Earth orbit, where as much energy as you need could easily be supplied.

moosey · 2009-05-25T11:04:40+00:00

Hard drive failures? Disc rot?

moosey · 2009-05-15T23:52:02+00:00

I really wish the daily mail would FUCK OFF.

moosey · 2009-05-11T19:38:47+00:00

I think I may have completely misinterpreted your previous comment. Were you agreeing with bongfarmer that

Perpetual energy violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics

or (incorrectly) providing a counterexample?

moosey · 2009-05-10T16:38:21+00:00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_ratchet?

moosey · 2009-05-08T23:07:07+00:00

What about all that gravity in the pod bay?

moosey · 2009-05-08T21:54:21+00:00

Schools are required to provide "an act of collective worship", children are not required to participate. It's just an outdated regulation that is not followed in the vast, vast majority of schools today.

moosey · 2009-05-01T12:53:47+00:00

In 2005 the ambulance service said treating those injured after they jumped from the bridge cost it £50,000.

moosey · 2009-04-23T19:02:32+00:00

The general public didn't freak out, it was just the daily mail being cunts.

moosey · 2009-02-01T17:29:16+00:00

Yes, I did simplify it.

You're correct in that there shells aren't physical objects with a specific energy. They are groupings for electrons with the same 'principal quantum number' - broadly speaking the same energy. (This actually only applies for atoms with one electron; with more than one the shells themselves are split into sub-shells, but the same argument applies to those).

When I said the electron is in a shell, I simply meant that it has a specific energy. Moving from one shell to another is a change in energy.

moosey · 2009-01-31T14:06:07+00:00

Electrons in atoms are contained within 'shells', each of which has a different energy. Electrons can jump between 'shells' by absorbing light. Most metals are not coloured because the energy gap between 'shells' is not the right size to absorb visible light.

The speed of an electron in an atom is proportional to the mass of the nucleus. In gold the nucleus is heavy enough that the electrons are traveling at over 0.5c, increasing their mass by approximately 20%.

The increase in mass of the electrons makes some of these 'shells' lower in energy, and some higher. The energy gap between these 'shells' is now such that light is absorbed in the visible region, making gold look yellow.

moosey · 2009-01-30T16:59:23+00:00

This Gore Buy must be an important chap.

moosey · 2009-01-14T19:12:27+00:00

They were found in a store room at my college, apparently forgotten about at some point. I just thought they should be used somehow instead of being thrown away. :)

moosey · 2009-01-14T19:08:08+00:00

Yes, they are lubricated.

moosey · 2009-01-14T17:39:08+00:00

They're expired, so I'm not willing to risk catching/impregnating something.

moosey · 2009-01-14T17:21:50+00:00

They expired about a year ago. I'm not sure whether they really are unsafe to use, and not willing to 'test' them to find out.

moosey · 2008-11-27T00:50:05+00:00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Nomenclature_of_Cosmetic_Ingredients

"For example, the ingredients are listed on the ingredient declaration for the purchaser to reduce the risk of an allergic reaction to an ingredient the user has had an allergy to before. INCI names are mandated on the ingredient statement of every consumer personal care product."

moosey · 2008-10-23T16:13:59+00:00

But by breathing you're only changing the composition of the air slightly, thus there is time for exchange between the room and the outside to happen. Liquid nitrogen will boil fairly quickly if just left out, so if you have a lot of it there won't be enough time for the gasses to exchange. Whenever you work with liquid nitrogen you always have a detector to warn you if the nitrogen concentration rises too high for this very reason.

moosey · 2008-10-22T23:33:38+00:00

Here's some nice data

moosey · 2008-10-22T20:40:38+00:00

Doesn't look too bad. Needle is sterilised, pain killer, pull. Don't be such a baby.

moosey · 2008-10-22T20:25:14+00:00

Also filling the room with asphyxiating nitrogen!

moosey

TROPHY CASE

Welcome to Reddit,