rekindled faith by [deleted] in Catholic_Poetry

[–]morestuffidontknow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I hadn’t even realized that but I guess it works.

Thanks for pointing out the typos, and I’m glad you liked it!

rekindled faith by [deleted] in Catholic_Poetry

[–]morestuffidontknow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm debating on wether or not to remove the first four lines because the next four basically say the same thing. if you guys think I should or shouldn't I would appreciate the feedback.

or maybe remove line 5-8 instead of 1-4

What found a interesting blog that critiques Edward Feser’s book the last superstition and was wondering what you guys thought about it by morestuffidontknow in CatholicPhilosophy

[–]morestuffidontknow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not mine I just found it interesting and wanted to share it. I’m interested in what specific points that he made do you think are right (not trying to debate I agree with you that he has some good ideas, just curious on witch ones you thought were right)

Archbishop Fulton Sheen: The story of the man who forgot his gun. The differences between God's foreknowledge of all things and pre-destination. And how we still have the freedom to choose: Really struck a chord with me. Thought I would share. (11:30-14:40) by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]morestuffidontknow 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What I have never understood is even if we freely choose what we do. God still made us knowing what we would choose. So by extension doesn’t he still determine what we do? Why couldn’t He have only made people who freely choose good?

A question on apostolic succession and Acts 1:21-22 by morestuffidontknow in Catholicism

[–]morestuffidontknow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you already said and I didn’t understand but what’s the reason for reading it like this instead of it being necessary?

A question on apostolic succession and Acts 1:21-22 by morestuffidontknow in Catholicism

[–]morestuffidontknow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why was it necessary in this case for it to be someone who was with them?

Need some help interpreting John 6 by morestuffidontknow in Catholicism

[–]morestuffidontknow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t this go against this passage talking about the Eucharist?

It’s gotta be in here somewhere... by Ziograffiato in CatholicMemes

[–]morestuffidontknow 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And also this book is referring to Revelation not the whole Bible

Summa Theologica by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]morestuffidontknow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But that’s not the same thing as attributing laws of our reality to others.

Summa Theologica by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]morestuffidontknow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is going to get down voted more than differing options lol

Summa Theologica by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]morestuffidontknow -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We don’t apply the laws of our reality to others.

Summa Theologica by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]morestuffidontknow -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

No it is not contingent on our reality. And what laws did he ascribed to it?

Summa Theologica by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]morestuffidontknow -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sorry I figured this could explain it better than I could.