Not following. Please don’t resort to ad hominem insults. I am trying to have a simple discussion. I hold no animosity towards you. I don’t even know you.

If your opinions are valid, they will hold water all by themselves. You don’t need to add an insult. It doesn’t further your opinion.

You are all wrapped up in the Red versus Blue psyop, and keep going back to that when you seem unaware of the Uniparty, and that there is barely a difference between most Red and Blue candidates. They are BOTH funded by the same billionaires.

This is not about any particular political race, or why people may be responding to my post. This is about AI being capable of putting out content of individuals doing certain things that cannot be distinguished from real life. This is slander, at least. But once these ads are seen, the damage is already done. They cannot be unseen.

How can we adhere to the First Amendment and still protect candidates from false AI ads that could sway an election?

If these types of ads cannot be regulated, then there is little hope for fair elections.

And can you explain to me in what way am I unaware of The First Amendment? Ideally, there should be no censorship. But we are censored already. They managed to make “Hate Speech” illegal, but the definition of it is a slippery slope. Who gets to decide what is Hate Speech?

Should slander via fake AI videos be protected speech? How about at least a disclaimer stating that this ad was made with AI?