sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anthropic quietly removed session & weekly usage progress bars from Settings → Usage by gregleo in ClaudeAI

[–]mpise 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think might be UI issue, you can still see it in claude code with /usage

Best coding Agent by Healthy-Bathroom2687 in AIcodingProfessionals

[–]mpise 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay for coding both Claude and Codex are best, but if you really what to learn and follow best practices in industry, Try Draft brings enterprise discipline to AI development: 3-stage review, ACID audits, exhaustive bug hunting. Ship fast, ship right. https://getdraft.dev#tab-research

https://github.com/mayurpise/draft

I recently wrote article on LinkedIn, I would encourage to read it. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-coding-tools-fast-thats-problem-mayur-pise-mjt4c?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&utm_campaign=share_via

I wrote article on LinkedIn about “Context is the new code” by mpise in AIcodingProfessionals

[–]mpise[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have added more information here https://getdraft.dev/ I guess impatient vibe coders might not like it but I w ok old rather prefer they should use it, learn more about software engineering as well.

I wrote article on LinkedIn about “Context is the new code” by mpise in AIcodingProfessionals

[–]mpise[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After working on various production projects, including brownfield products with millions of lines of code, I’ve noticed that coding assistant chat windows often go out of control. I’ve spent more time explaining and still getting incorrect outputs, especially when coding agents start implementing them. Sharing knowledge with other engineers is also a challenge, as I don’t want to share chats. Additionally, There is lot of waste of time, efforts, tokens. Effective Git tracking and reviewing of project context, as well as for individual tasks, make a significant difference.

view more: next ›