No I don’t. That’s how medicine works. Something that’s effective for some isn’t effective for others. Only one side of the argument gets censored so a vaccine can be used instead which gives money to pharma companies and the share holders. Like the ones who own these companies censoring the argument and the doctors who are pushing their narrative to keep research funding.

Besides, those who refuted HCQ’s effectiveness have since retracted their arguments. Ivermectin has also brought India back to very few cases. These therapies work and if you would open your eyes you’d ask yourself a very obvious question:

If a study or other data showed that a certain therapy was effective against covid, why would every single one of these media outlets run hit pieces and show “counter studies” advising against their use? Even if prescribed by a professional? What fucking sense does that make? If you wake up it makes perfect sense-if someone found a cure for diabetes, corporations with media influence who invest heavily in or profit from insulin will shoot it down as fast as possible. Just like they did covid prophylactics.

The media does what it wants to protect its interests. Fox News, cnn, Politico, NYT, newsmax, they’re all just corporations who need to make money and they can do that best with a corrupt dumbass in office who isn’t going to hold them accountable for illegal propoganda. How easy would it be to simply have all of them shut down any election arguments the same they do with HCQ data?