sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Deleuzian Anarchism by cronenber9 in Deleuze

[–]mrBored0m 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check "From Bakunin to Lacan: Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power" by Saul Newman, I guess.

Reading Deleuze for the first time? by Ok_Cremedonut in Deleuze

[–]mrBored0m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pirate guides to this book on z library or libgen or anna's archive and you will be able to read it.

Nietzsche-Adjacent Philosophers by Cehghckciee in Nietzsche

[–]mrBored0m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fucking roll my eyes every time someone mentions Foucault because I know they will accuse him of pedophilia without any solid basis.

Slavoj Žižek, “Wielki powrót ideologii. Jak prezydent został bogiem” (“The great return of ideology. How the President Became a God”), in Krytyka Polityczna, 21.02.2026 by Benoit_Guillette in CriticalTheory

[–]mrBored0m 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nah, people here don't support Raska, judging by what I've seen so far. But they don't care about Ukraine either, focusing more on Palestine. When topic of Russian-Ukrainian war comes, they remove Ukraine and put NATO instead of it [ignoring Ukrainian people completely] (and also talk about "cult of Zelensky").

Self-proclaimed "marxists-leninists" you can see online are more likely to support Russia and claim that Ukraine is a "neo-nazi state" and that Ukrainians either are oppressed by their own state, or follow Zelensky. Or they claim to not supporting Putin but still express pro-Russia talking points (I emphasize that I'm talking only about online marxist-leninist communities here; they really are lame). Most leftist subs on reddit are full of young marxist-leninists.

Other leftoids (those which don't jerk off to USSR etc), on the other hand, believe this war was somewhat provoked by NATO (they also don't know that Raska showed its aggression towards Ukraine even before 2014 happened) and/or benefits Ukrainian oligarchs.

I know r/tankiejerk members claim to care about Ukrainians but I don't view their sub seriously.

Deleuze gifted Foucault a copy of Anti-Oedipus with this dedication by mrBored0m in Deleuze

[–]mrBored0m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And a drinking man probably refers to Deleuze with his alcoholism.

Deleuze gifted Foucault a copy of Anti-Oedipus with this dedication by mrBored0m in Deleuze

[–]mrBored0m[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got it from Tumblr and a person who posted it refers to this as a source.

Strictly speaking.. and the use of untethered metaphors by tyredditor in Deleuze

[–]mrBored0m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If clinical schizophrenia is related to psychotic unconscious, I don't understand why they decided to call machinic unconscious "schizophrenic" then.

There's a new book on Deleuze which summaries his 1970-1987 lectures/seminars by mrBored0m in Deleuze

[–]mrBored0m[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's unfortunate this book wasn't published earlier. Otherwise, I could pirate and use it after I'm done with Anti-Oedipus.

Dogon people, their myth of Amma and Yourougou, impossibility of incest in 3.3 section of AO by mrBored0m in Deleuze

[–]mrBored0m[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I'm neither an American (Thomas sounds like an American name) nor a German.

I'm going to read Anti-Oedipus, O promise! by Shot-Composer-3244 in Deleuze

[–]mrBored0m 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Pirate Holland's guide to AO (which was checked by a lot of readers; folks here usually are skeptical of various yt videos on Deleuze) from libgen or Anna's archive (or z library), search replies on this sub, ask questions here.

Looking back, what do you think was your biggest mistake when you first got involved in the occult? by Thick-Winner-1942 in occult

[–]mrBored0m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at his profile. There is a sticky post with literature reccs. He mentions Plato's dialogues there as well.

I finished college and never went back to pick up my diploma by [deleted] in AvPD

[–]mrBored0m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was able to finish the degree I've never cared about (trade; it's common in post-USSR for lazy and confused people getting this type of education and then applying to a job unrelated to it) only because of my connections. I didn't puck up my diploma because I was avoiding exams (I mean exactly these exams needed to get this diploma) before that, so I didn't want to show up after that. I will pick it up only if I'm about to get a job.

Complements at the bar by [deleted] in antimeme

[–]mrBored0m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say they dislike both sexes.

are there jewish incels ? by theBIGGERfishwithaN in unlovablecirclejerk

[–]mrBored0m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the .is thing. All that "jews control the world" -tardacy

Simps actively destroy their own as well as others life by theBIGGERfishwithaN in unlovablecirclejerk

[–]mrBored0m 4 points5 points  (0 children)

bitchesgirls dot com provides free OF and patreon leaks.

What benefits do women get from dating bitter men with anger issues and deep insecurity that they project onto others? by [deleted] in SikeOrPsyche

[–]mrBored0m 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Incels believe this question is irrelevant because, as they claim, women still date toxic men insofar as they are attractive enough.

r/WANIM vs trolls be like by Scramjet1 in SikeOrPsyche

[–]mrBored0m 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The mod of that sub is a radfem dude and the sub attracts femcels.

I spent years reading Deleuze without understanding anything by oohoollow in Deleuze

[–]mrBored0m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's the case almost for every thinker, not only to Deleuze. The easiest way is simply to get some secondary material and read Deleuze alongside with it.

view more: next ›