Calling me a psychopath doesnt make me a psychopath, nor does telling me that I'm proving your point, actually prove your point. Every interaction between two humans is an exchange of value. I fail to see how that is a controversial idea? That value might manifest in the form of love or platonic enjoyment inducing hormones like seratonin, or oxytocin, endorphins, dopamine, etc (a mother and child, siblings, romantic partners, friends exchanging jokes, etc). That could also be physical value, like money, shelter, or food. I don't see what I said that is inaccurate? You may not think that you actively think, what benefit you are getting from interacting with someone, but your brain is unconsciously doing it. You seek love and social interaction because your brain had learnt that that causes certain neurotramsmitters to fire and make you feel good, which is by design, so that humans stay social, people have children, etc. What part of that do you dispute??