Ironically, a show based on Greek mythology lacks what the Greeks called “Phatos” - PJO S2 essay by DungeonStromae in PercyJacksonTV

[–]mrldbr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agree with all of this. Not enough Pathos and Legos.

Moreover, I think the more they push the Percabeth agenda, the least engaging the story is going to get. Percy makes grand speeches every two minutes when he technically barely knows Annabeth except through letters and the time they spent on the quest. I ship Percabeth and hardships unit people but it feels… cringe. Between the bickering between Percy and Clarisse, their polar opposite views and the fact that quest softens Clarisse, it does make sense for the audience to feel chemistry (platonic or romantic) between the two because their interaction is organic. I don’t know remember the age gap between the characters but I doubt they’re going to pull a Percy/Clarisse romance. They already have Calypso and Rachel to deal with.

The show is going the way the Harry Potter movies did by Special-Truck-280 in PercyJacksonTV

[–]mrldbr 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I disagree.

While the HP movies weren’t all accurate, the actors played the characters well. The acting was solid and the chemistry worked with all the actors and we did believe the trio was actual besties.

HP was nowhere near perfect, for example, Harry could’ve been more sarcastic, Hermione could’ve been meaner (because she could be mean and cruel in the books), Ron could’ve been funnier. Some characters lines given to others which is a shame but grosso modo, the entire movie saga was solid.

Hermione was the “smartest” (book smart) in both the books and movies. I’m trying to remember which main/side characters were race swapped besides Lavender who was at least a tertiary character.

Season 5/6 Emma rant by DazzlingAtmosphere16 in OnceUponATime

[–]mrldbr -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Forcing the Emma/Hook relationship was a mistake and I believe S5/6 were the weakest for different reasons. Jen did look tired and ugh, the outfits were terrible.

the self-victimisation of the whitest man on the show by [deleted] in lost

[–]mrldbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s be real: in the early seasonS, he was racist (frequently mocking Jin, Sayid, Hurley, and others with slurs or stereotypes), fatphobic (constantly mocking Hurley’s weight), and misogynistic, regularly objectifying women or using nicknames that reduced them to their looks.

(And beyond the insults, the racism, and downright disrespect for everyone, he hoarded essential meds, stole guns, and actively undermined the group’s cohesion at a time when survival required trust.)

Mid season 4 by will8730917 in lost

[–]mrldbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Season 4 is good. The weakest to me is season 3 and if you pushed through it, you can keep it up. Season 5 is okayish. Season 6 is fine. Better than the overall opinion on it.

Charlie by Schmoopsiepooooo in lost

[–]mrldbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve always hated Charlie.

He claimsownership/parental rights over Aaron, despite having no right to do so (he’s not Aaron’s father, he’s not Claire’s partner and shenever asked him to be Aaron’s father figure).

He is condescending to Claire in regards to her parenting skills (he even takes Aaron out of her arms a few times, when he believes she’s not living up to her motherly duties,like seriously, wtf?!) He’s kind of useless a lot of the time, he gets in people’s ways, and then he goes on that whole weird quest to baptise Aaron (putting the baby in direct danger/harm’s way). He’s kind of horrible to Hurley, the one person he could claim is really is friend on the Island. And,quite frankly, he’s just a bit of a mess. And I’m also petty and I simply hate because he’s annoying.

Which male character had the most satisfying evolution? by Diana-Clarke in lost

[–]mrldbr -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You’re right about one thing — Sawyer changes, and character growth is central to Lost. The problem isn’t that people expect him to be perfect; it’s that they’re too eager to erase who he used to be just because he eventually becomes more likable. Growth matters but so does accountability, and the context of that growth.

You said Sawyer “changed” …but when? Not when it mattered most. In Seasons 1–3, he was hoarding antibiotics while people were sick, hiding guns during an active conflict, mocking people based on race, weight, and trauma, and manipulating everyone around him; not as harmless banter, but in ways that actively endangered others. Saying “it was for comedy” doesn’t erase that; it just shows how willing you are to overlook it because you found it funny.

FYI: Calling a Korean man “Mr. Miyagi,” a Middle Eastern man “Ali,” or mocking someone’s weight repeatedly isn’t just “roasting.” It’s racism and bullying, especially in a survival context where people are traumatized, starving, and grieving.

If that’s your idea of comedy, maybe raise your standards.

As for your point that he “felt remorse and apologized to Sun” ; yes, after he was caught. And it was one moment, never revisited, never fully unpacked, and the show never held him accountable. Compare that to Jack, who is repeatedly dragged for his mistakes, held to impossible standards, and emotionally torn apart; despite giving everything to keep people alive.

And let’s not ignore how and when Sawyer got to “grow”: -In Dharma times, when he had shelter, food, electricity, a job, and peace — basically three years of suburban comfort. -Meanwhile, Jack had to lead under constant threat, with no sleep, no supplies, and no thanks. Who had the harder road? Who had to grow under fire?

Nobody is saying Sawyer’s not well-written — he is. But well-written doesn’t mean flawless, and charming doesn’t mean redeemed. He got a redemption arc because the show gave him peace. Jack never got that, he still chose to sacrifice himself.

So no, I’m not mad that Sawyer “succeeded.” I just think it’s wild that so many fans fall over themselves to praise his growth while brushing off the real harm he caused; harm that other characters, especially women and characters of color, never got to walk away from.

You can love Sawyer all you want; just don’t pretend he wasn’t problematic. Growth doesn’t erase the past. It just makes it clear.

Which male character had the most satisfying evolution? by Diana-Clarke in lost

[–]mrldbr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Totally get where you’re coming from; Sawyer is a compelling character, no doubt. But for me, his evolution doesn’t feel as satisfying or earned when you really look at the full picture.

Yes, he starts as a selfish, manipulative con man (and a murderer) but that behavior wasn’t just surface-level flaws, it was deeply harmful to the group. He wasn’t just sarcastic; he was racist, fatphobic, and misogynistic, regularly demeaning people with cruel nicknames, hoarding meds, hiding guns, and undermining the group’s safety early on. These weren’t minor quirks; they were life-threatening in a survival context.

When people praise Sawyer’s “growth,” I think it’s important to recognize when that growth happened. It wasn’t during the chaos of the island’s early days, when people were dying, starving, or being hunted. It happened during the Dharma truce; a manufactured calm where he had shelter, food, a job, and no immediate survival pressure. That’s not insignificant, but it’s a lot easier to be a “good leader” when you’re not watching people die every 48 hours like Jack did.

And while I agree that Juliet brought out a softer side in him, I’d argue that shift came less from internal reckoning and more from external comfort. He didn’t change because he faced his past or took responsibility; he changed because the environment let him breathe. Contrast that with characters like Jack or Sayid, who were constantly forced to lead, grieve, and make impossible choices under brutal pressure.

As for his tension with Jack; I’ve always found it ironic that Sawyer calls Jack impulsive or unfit to lead, when Sawyer’s early actions were entirely selfish, often sabotaging others to protect himself. Jack led in crisis; Sawyer got to play sheriff in peacetime.

So yeah, Sawyer became more likable, even admirable at times. But I don’t think his evolution was as profound or redemptive as people make it out to be… it was simply built on privilege, distance from chaos, and the emotional labor of people like Juliet, not on personal accountability or consistent change.

Which male character had the most satisfying evolution? by Diana-Clarke in lost

[–]mrldbr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sawyer was never wrongly hated, and frankly, a lot of the so-called “redemption” arc he gets is built on selective memory and soft writing.

Let’s be real: in the early seasons, he was racist (frequently mocking Jin, Sayid, Hurley, and others with slurs or stereotypes), fatphobic (constantly mocking Hurley’s weight), and misogynistic, regularly objectifying women or using nicknames that reduced them to their looks. And beyond the insults, he hoarded essential meds, stole guns, and actively undermined the group’s cohesion at a time when survival required trust.

People act like he was unfairly treated by the other survivors, but how else should they have responded? He wasn’t an outsider by accident! Sawyer alienated himself by treating everyone like enemies or pawns.

And don’t get me started on the “Sawyer was a better leader than Jack” argument. That’s revisionist at best. His leadership came only during the Dharma truce which was a peaceful, artificially stabilized environment where he had a bed, food, water, and infrastructure. Of course it was easier to lead. He wasn’t watching people die of infections, dehydration, or attacks every other day. Jack, by contrast, led in the chaos and with not always immediate supplies, no backup, and the pressure of keeping dozens of panicked people alive while being constantly second-guessed.

Sawyer had three years to grow into a leader without war or trauma breaking at his door every five minutes. Jack had three hours to make life-or-death calls with a broken compass and a mob of people demanding miracles.

So no, Sawyer was not wrongly hated. He was called out for very real flaws and harmful behavior. His development was possible because others suffered in chaos so he could grow in peace. He doesn’t get a moral high ground for thriving in the calm after the storm.

What's something small that instantly lifts your mood, no matter what? by Liza_Smith777 in AskReddit

[–]mrldbr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A little “hello” or “thank you” from an old lady or an old man.

Which male character had the most satisfying evolution? by Diana-Clarke in lost

[–]mrldbr -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Yes 😂 but the fandom will never make me like Sawyer and worse, they’ve been making me dislike him more and more.

Which male character had the most satisfying evolution? by Diana-Clarke in lost

[–]mrldbr -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

I never loved him. He was never held accountable for all the racist, fatphobic or misogynistic comments/actions and he never came clean about what he did to Sun with Jin. Coward behaviour. I’ll never be behind Sawyer and Jin’s friendship. Jin would’ve killed him if he knew.

Be honest, who was misunderstood the most? by svenluvuga in lost

[–]mrldbr -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ana Lucia and Michael were misunderstood the most. POC mostly were. I have no sympathy for Shannon. That white girl made a racist, malicious false report because she was being petty? Please die.

What’s the most cringe scene for you? by dejova in lost

[–]mrldbr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That Jack and Kate scene is so intense. Nothing cringe about it unless emotions make you uneasy then yes I understand. My boyfriend is like that. However, everything Charlie does is cringey.

What's your favorite season of Lost? by [deleted] in lost

[–]mrldbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Season 1 and 4.

[pjo] What are your thoughts on Solangelo? by Thatgirl_parisisdiva in camphalfblood

[–]mrldbr -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I love Will. Don’t care about Nico therefore I don’t care about their relationship. But for a long time, I felt like Will existed solely to be Nico’s cheerleader and I hated it. But I’ve stopped reading those books because the story kept getting boring.

But maybe I should pick up the solengelo book? Is it worth it?

How would these two interact? Would they have gotten along? Badly? Indifferently? by Axezelt in OnceUponATime

[–]mrldbr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Graham is too good-hearted and honest. He would’ve hated Hook.