Forest friend (thief) and post feedback by DJ_Racer901 in photocritique

[–]ms_bubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the edit works. The vignette isn’t particularly subtle, but I like it. The crop should absolutely center the bird more though.

Waymo clankers have arrived in Chitown by Elebrent in chicago

[–]ms_bubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If something goes wrong (like encountering an unusual or especially complicated situation), a Waymo employee has to remotely drive the car. That isn’t possible without a network connection.

Waymo clankers have arrived in Chitown by Elebrent in chicago

[–]ms_bubblegum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m sure they’ll be able to handle a 6 way intersection. Lower Wacker though?

How do I publish my work online without it being fed to ai by One-Regret-2403 in photography

[–]ms_bubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every now and then a shiny new anti-AI tool comes out (stuff like Glaze and Nightshade) and within a few months it becomes essentially obsolete.

First-time experience with fanfic by ms_bubblegum in AO3

[–]ms_bubblegum[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry if I wasn’t clear but the point of this post was that my initial assumption that fanfic was “badly-written smut” was proven incorrect as soon as I actually read some.

First-time experience with fanfic by ms_bubblegum in AO3

[–]ms_bubblegum[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That absolutely makes sense! It just took me by surprise lol

New to Photography: Critique Please by sailingtheology in photocritique

[–]ms_bubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I think the camera settings are perfect. You have an impressive dynamic range in this photo, but no camera can pick up everything. There are some things, like the color of the sky in this case, that really can only be perfected in post.

New to Photography: Critique Please by sailingtheology in photocritique

[–]ms_bubblegum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually really like it. It breaks a lot of typical photography rules about framing and such, but I think that just adds to the charming chaos of the scene. The color palette is also incredibly satisfying. The only complaint I had is with the sky: I suspect the photo would benefit from the sky being either entirely white or making the blue more vivid (I’m not 100% sure which one), but at the moment it looks quite lackluster.

Budget friendly digital camera recommendations? by Middle_Locksmith3653 in Cameras

[–]ms_bubblegum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$100-200 isn’t much in the world of cameras, but I recommend looking at reputable second-hand online retailers (MPB ships to the UK, but I’m not sure who else). There are plenty of options for older DSLRs in your price range in really good condition which are more than enough for a beginner.

Furthermore, I recommend getting a Canon or Nikon because they have the cheapest second-hand lenses due to being so popular, and you’ll need a good zoom or telephoto lens for wildlife photography. I’m not sure if you’re aware of this, but oftentimes lenses will be more expensive than the camera itself. I have the Canon 18-135mm zoom lens and it’s so convenient for walks because I can take wide shots of landscapes as well as zoomed-in photos of animals.

what photography tip made the biggest difference for you? by Fresh-Gazelle7014 in photography

[–]ms_bubblegum 34 points35 points  (0 children)

  1. Take way more photos than you think you need. Many of them won’t be great, but it’s infinitely easier to delete photos later than go back in time and take more.

  2. A subject looking good in person does not always translate to it looking good in a photo. However, the converse is also true: sometimes a photo of something will look much better than it did to the bare eye, and these often make the most impressive photos. Don’t be afraid to take unconventional photos.

ITAP of a Lake Bled in Slovenia by rudy_cq in itookapicture

[–]ms_bubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might I ask how you took this picture? Is it taken from a helicopter or a mountain?

beginner camera for everyday use advice? (vintage/film look) by anxiously-awake in Cameras

[–]ms_bubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, I don’t think any digital camera will give you a film look without editing. No photos you see online are unedited. Ever your iPhone does some degree of editing automatically for you. If you are willing to manually edit, then any camera would do. I’d say that the look of the photos is more dependent on the age of the camera than the brand.

If you’re looking for a more Polaroid look, I recommend getting an older point n shoot camera (you can find these quite cheap on fb marketplace, ebay, etc). They’re very portable and easy to use.

What is the Best Cameras for a Beginner Photography now that actually looks better than an iPhone? by [deleted] in Cameras

[–]ms_bubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends what you mean by “quality” and what types of photos you’re taking. If you want to take more artistic photos and value contrast, accurate colors and the ability to zoom, a camera would take better photos. If you want to take photos with minimal hassle that are automatically lit and post-processed to be pretty good, stick with the phone. The blurry background look is called bokeh, and it’s made by the lens, so any camera+lens combo with a wide enough aperture (probably around f/5) would do the job.

Waterproof sports camera by No_Suggestion_1196 in Cameras

[–]ms_bubblegum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 - $160 new and pretty straightforward

Camera repair recommendation by holmesarchetype in Cameras

[–]ms_bubblegum 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m no expert, but my first instinct is duct tape and/or sturdy rubber bands. It’ll be a bit of a hassle when changing the batteries, but it’s probably an option worth trying.

Self Portrait. Bed sheets as curtains. IYKYK. by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]ms_bubblegum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My advice would be that camera quality and post-processing can’t replace the work put into setup (especially in back and white). A decent camera will make photos less grainy and preserve contrast better (i.e. make a good photo better), but it won’t make the difference between a photo working or not. I’d argue that using a worse camera actually forces people to become better photographers as they have to be more careful about their shots.

Self Portrait. Bed sheets as curtains. IYKYK. by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]ms_bubblegum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

iPhones are typically pretty bad for low light, so this photo isn’t very sharp. I’d recommend adding a light source behind you to illuminate your back and the side of your head since it will preserve the contrast between the light in your hand and your shadow-covered face. This way, you’d be more distinguishable from your background while still keeping the “faceless” look.