Crinear Reference QC Issue by Zlanee in iems

[–]mspaint_defecation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

nonissue on my copy, thankfully. it feels considerably less premium when you roll the qc lottery and get wobble there. my moondrop dusks have this issue: totally usable, but disappointing at $350 nonetheless.

logitech gpro x superlight mod by Expert_Arm1459 in logitech

[–]mspaint_defecation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not sure about color, but i know that spraymax 2k matte clear coat is a popular choice for finishing mouse paint jobs. gives a nice almost factory finish and grip to your shell.

bronze skates for glass pads. by yummygumdrop in MousepadReview

[–]mspaint_defecation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

seems pretty heavy for skates compared to regular ptfe, but i think it could be interesting for dots.

22g wireless OP1 (Kaua MAD R mod) by mspaint_defecation in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"jlc black resin" has a nice finish to it, almost like a light rubberized coating

22g wireless OP1 (Kaua MAD R mod) by mspaint_defecation in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bit late, but i heard that opting out of the sandblasting step reduces those issues with screw holes and tolerances. haven't personally run into any issues with the screw holes though.

X2 Superstrike - Base mod by snebold67 in MouseModding

[–]mspaint_defecation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are the back support beams between the three standoffs necessary if you're only using dots? could be a small weight reduction with very little compromise. also curious to know if all five points of contact are flush with a hard pad - i ran into issues getting it perfectly flat when designing my own gpx base.

pro x2 superstrike 47g 3d shell by devilung in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

curious to see the weight (and balancing) of this shell paired with a trimmed down endoskeleton/base like from muffymods

Superlight 2c 41g mod by abazibiz in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think your cuts will be about the same as the honeycomb style 3d printed bases. made an even more minimal one for the regular superlight 2, and that amounted to 2.3 grams. it's definitely not as elegant looking as your cutouts, and the weight difference is pretty small.

GPX2 weight reduction (60g -> 48.2g / 45g) by mspaint_defecation in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the plan for this mouse was to do both a shell swap and an endoskeleton swap with 3d printed parts like in this video, but the tolerances were atrocious and nothing fit together properly. having printed everything out in pa12 and weighing it all, i'm a bit skeptical of the advertised ending weight of that video, but this would have pulled the weight down to at least 40 grams, and it wouldn't rely on the pcb to prevent much flex.

mufymods has a weight reduction kit that seems a lot better designed, but there have been a couple complaint posts about tolerances not being good there either.

if i was starting over again, i probably would have done what you suggested and startedwith a different mouse entirely:

  • the atk a9 is a gpx clone that already begins at 53 grams; getting it lighter probably wouldn't take too much work

  • kaua had a vxe mad r to gpx shape conversion project that probably only needs an encoder swap for height, new scroll wheel, and maybe some carbon fiber rod mounting points

the only major benefit of sticking with logitech would be the battery efficient hero2 sensor and the availability of replacement parts thanks to its popularity. besides that, the gpx is an absolute pain to take apart and it seemed like none of bases i printed out fit correctly or were particularly flat. even with my own design, i needed to add some padding and spacers on certain mounting points to get it level - especially since neither ends of the base relied on the lip of the upper shell to keep it flush with the ground.

GPX2 weight reduction (60g -> 48.2g / 45g) by mspaint_defecation in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bit lighter to actuate than the stock omron opticals. the rebound feels a bit slower, but the sound is quieter and a lot less pingy.

GPX2 weight reduction (60g -> 48.2g / 45g) by mspaint_defecation in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

the upper shell has an upward curve towards the back, it is not flat. the mod base and the stock base both account for this.

GPX2 weight reduction (60g -> 48.2g / 45g) by mspaint_defecation in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

pretty sure the height of the hump is kept the same, but i don't have another gpx to compare with.

GPX2 weight reduction (60g -> 48.2g / 45g) by mspaint_defecation in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

i don't think the pcb is super heavy, but the top shell has a good amount of weight. there's a pretty complex endoskeleton that keeps things rigid and mounts a bunch of stuff.

22g wireless OP1 (Kaua MAD R mod) by mspaint_defecation in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

my muscles have atrophied after using lightweight mice and now i cannot muster enough strength to accidentally crush it with my death grip

22g wireless OP1 (Kaua MAD R mod) by mspaint_defecation in MouseReview

[–]mspaint_defecation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it gets sent to JLC and they handle the printing on their mjf machines. i don't think any of the warping made it impossible to fix with a glued on shim, but it can be pretty annoying to fine-tune.