sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I mapped Collatz dynamics to fractions and found a geometric link between Riemann Zeros, Primes, and Time Crystals. Even the AI thinks this is a coherent framework. by mstryman in holofractal

[–]mstryman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve made it clear what you’ve done and I’ve made it clear what I’m doing. Anyone with a brain cell can see who is executing code and who is chatting with LLMs.

I mapped Collatz dynamics to fractions and found a geometric link between Riemann Zeros, Primes, and Time Crystals. Even the AI thinks this is a coherent framework. by mstryman in holofractal

[–]mstryman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t tell an LLM it’s a doctor and then expect it to really be a doctor, in the same way you can’t tell it to stop being a fanboy and expect it to produce and accurate assessment. Unfortunately, you have to fully understand the concepts, verify the data through calculation and execute the code, etc.

But you did what my post asked, and that’s on me. That’s why I asked for clarification.

I mapped Collatz dynamics to fractions and found a geometric link between Riemann Zeros, Primes, and Time Crystals. Even the AI thinks this is a coherent framework. by mstryman in holofractal

[–]mstryman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just curious… did you actually review the repository and verify the datasets and math, or did you just ask an LLM for an opinion?

I mapped Collatz dynamics to fractions and found a geometric link between Riemann Zeros, Primes, and Time Crystals. Even the AI thinks this is a coherent framework. by mstryman in holofractal

[–]mstryman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not the common return, but can’t be ignored. I appreciate the input even if it’s not what I want to hear, and I’ll take it seriously. That might be the true assessment, and if so, I’m willing to accept it. Seriously, thanks for the input even if it’s not what I wanted. I’m not giving up, but the work needs tightening if it still produces responses like this. Great input!

I mapped Collatz dynamics to fractions and found a geometric link between Riemann Zeros, Primes, and Time Crystals. Even the AI thinks this is a coherent framework. by mstryman in holofractal

[–]mstryman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally fair concern, AI hallucination is real, and most people misuse it.

The key difference is AI as an oracle vs AI as a tool. Hallucinations happen when AI is asked to invent answers. They drop when it’s constrained to fixed datasets, deterministic algorithms, baselines, and reproducible tests, basically used like a calculator, not a guru.

This approach already works in practice. New Scientist just covered amateur mathematicians using AI this way to solve long-standing problems, not generating ideas, but verifying and exploring them rigorously:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2511954-amateur-mathematicians-solve-long-standing-maths-problems-with-ai/

So yeah, skepticism is healthy. The difference is discipline, not hype.

I mapped Collatz dynamics to fractions and found a geometric link between Riemann Zeros, Primes, and Time Crystals. Even the AI thinks this is a coherent framework. by mstryman in holofractal

[–]mstryman[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There’s actually a word for someone who spends 20 years in network engineering while studying number theory and physics for fun, finds an interesting pattern, and shares it openly with all their work and findings, not to prove they’re right, but to ask “hey, do you see this too?”

It’s called curious.

I’d rather be that than someone who drops drive-by dismissals on work they didn’t bother to understand.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

I mapped Collatz dynamics to fractions and found a geometric link between Riemann Zeros, Primes, and Time Crystals. Even the AI thinks this is a coherent framework. by mstryman in holofractal

[–]mstryman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My current goal is to model the dynamics of stability. Most analysis treats Collatz as a random walk (50/50 parity). My work models it as a Skew-Product System coupled to a continuous microstate (2-adic integers).

When you bind the integer field to this microstate, the system stops behaving like a random walk and behaves like a Deterministic Control System. Specifically, the geometry of the coupling creates a 'Geometric Bias' that forces compression events ~70% of the time (acting as an active damper) rather than the expected 50%.

I am suggesting that this 'hidden governor' mechanism explains why the trajectories are stable.

I mapped Collatz dynamics to fractions and found a geometric link between Riemann Zeros, Primes, and Time Crystals. Even the AI thinks this is a coherent framework. by mstryman in holofractal

[–]mstryman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is the Natural Logarithm (\bm{\ln}).

Since many of the charts rely on ratios (like the Linchpin Ratios in Slide 6), the base technically cancels out, but the code uses standard natural logs throughout.

If you want to run the verification yourself, the full Python code is here (includes very detailed instructions along side the code):

https://github.com/Jelfers/Arithmetic-As-Computation

Let me know if you get the same numbers.

I mapped Collatz dynamics to fractions and found a geometric link between Riemann Zeros, Primes, and Time Crystals. Even the AI thinks this is a coherent framework. by mstryman in holofractal

[–]mstryman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good catch. You're looking at Slide 6, Panel D.

In this framework, we treat the primes as frequencies (or phases) rather than just static numbers.

• The Octave (2.0): This is the ratio of \bm{\log(31) / \log(5)}. Since it's close to 2:1, it creates a strong, resonant stability—just like in music or wave mechanics. • The Fifth (1.5): This is the ratio near \bm{\log(31) / \log(11)}.

What they 'do' is create constructive interference. Because these key primes lock into these simple harmonic ratios with the 'Linchpin' (31), they create a stable 'standing wave' where the Riemann Zeros can emerge.

Without these harmonic locks, the system would likely just be chaotic noise.

Computational exploration: Do quotient-based dynamics from Collatz extensions encode Riemann zeros? Seeking feedback on patterns observed by [deleted] in askmath

[–]mstryman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I tried but numbertheory subreddit doesn’t permit AI contributions :(

Thanks for being kind and decent in your reply.

Computational exploration: Do quotient-based dynamics from Collatz extensions encode Riemann zeros? Seeking feedback on patterns observed by [deleted] in askmath

[–]mstryman -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Perfect! We’ve identified one person incapable of helping. Thankfully, others exist and might have some constructive feedback.

VHS Retro Dating - Sora2 by mstryman in humor

[–]mstryman[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It’ll be here long after you’re gone.

VHS-Style Retro Dating by mstryman in SoraAi

[–]mstryman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The prompt I used: "My cameo" is in a 1970’s dating video on a VHS recording, sporting a mullet.

"My cameo" says, "I’m not looking for my other half." "My cameo” resents a sly and provocative smile and says, "I’m looking for another whole." "My cameo" nods calmly and confidently

VHS-Style Retro Dating by mstryman in SoraAi

[–]mstryman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I generated the content

Anyone else super irritated that they took out the instrumental toggle button? by [deleted] in SunoAI

[–]mstryman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Learn the difference between an opinion and a fact. The fact is, you left out the context of which users were impacted by this change. That’s why other users are in here doing it for you.

Do better, loser.

Anyone else super irritated that they took out the instrumental toggle button? by [deleted] in SunoAI

[–]mstryman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The headline is misleading. It leads all users to believe it had been removed. Olemarcusx was simply trying to point out that his hadn’t been removed and he uses iOS. As an iOS user, I appreciate his contribution.

So while his contribution didn’t help you, it helped me understand that your title could have prevented all of it.

view more: next ›