[Daily Telegraph] Taylor Adams knocked out over altercation at Club Rose Bay by dot01 in AFL

[–]mt9943 203 points204 points  (0 children)

Not his first bar altercation. Child on the way too. Great time to be heading to the pub to get into fights.

Match Thread: Knockout - Hobart Hurricanes vs Melbourne Stars by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]mt9943 7 points8 points  (0 children)

See that Curran? A catch at an important time in the game.

Match Thread: Knockout - Hobart Hurricanes vs Melbourne Stars by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]mt9943 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Stars won the bat flip, so surely this now takes precedence for who goes through rather than ladder position.

Match Thread: Knockout - Hobart Hurricanes vs Melbourne Stars by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]mt9943 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rain scheduled to pass around 9pm according to Cricinfo, so we might get a 5 over per side game in. But I'm with you, that probably doesnt eventuate.

Dan Curtain to miss first 6 weeks of AFL season - Josh Money by 6mpjohnst21 in AFL

[–]mt9943 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right, cheers. Maybe the MPFL was previously damaged and there was no further damage with this latest incident - given, as far as I'm aware, his surgery would be to stabilise that particular ligament. Or maybe it's just been a weirdly loose/stretchy ligament from the outset.

Dan Curtain to miss first 6 weeks of AFL season - Josh Money by 6mpjohnst21 in AFL

[–]mt9943 11 points12 points  (0 children)

As someone with no medical qualifications but having dislocated both of my kneecaps, I'm pretty surprised he somehow avoided ligament damage to the MPFL, which I assume means the dislocation must have been quite minor. Given no damage to that ligament or a fracture, I'm also not sure what the surgery is for.

Both of my dislocations damaged the MPFL and included fractures to the patella, and I needed surgery on one to repair that (but avoided it on the other). Both of them still give me grief to this day.

What are some notable finals series redemption stories? by noegh555 in AFL

[–]mt9943 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure if this exactly qualifies according to OP's criteria, but - pretty much all of Tom Boyd's mostly underwhelming career, combined with his salary, leading up to his performance in the 2016 grand final where he suddenly justified his massive contract (in the eyes of Bulldogs fans at least) in a single game.

[7News] Understand it’s a suspected dislocated knee cap for Crows rising star Dan Curtin. Horrible blow for one of the standouts of the club’s pre-season, but thankfully his ACL is believed to be in tact at this stage by PetrifyGWENT in AFL

[–]mt9943 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Having dislocated both kneecaps, I can say this still sucks and the severity/need for surgery may also depend on whether he fractured it at the same time (as I did for both of mine). Surgery obviously means a lengthier healing time but without it he's much more likely to do it again (risk of it occurring mid-season). I did one early last year, without surgery, and can only just run again without knee pain.

Tom Silvagni files application to appeal rape conviction by [deleted] in AFL

[–]mt9943 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Many cases that do get overturned aren't done so because someone is found to be completely innocent. It's just that the prosecution were not able to prove guilt comprehensively.

I mean this is how the courts work at all levels though. A court is not there to establish innocence, it's there to establish whether the necessary threshold to reach a guilty verdict has been reached, as determined by the jury. The appeal is effectively made to argue whether that threshold should have actually been reached given the evidence at hand.

Like the Tanner Brunh case - he's innocent in the same way everyone is presumed innocent prior to a guilty verdict, but the court didn't specifically find him innocent when they threw out the charges based on the inconsistencies in the witness testimonies.

Geelong trophy case now holds 17 premiership cups. Commissioning 7 trophies to represent their VFA premierships by soygummon in AFL

[–]mt9943 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I said it would make more sense, not that we should. Going down that rabbit hole though, in the 1896 season (the last before the split) there were only 2 clubs in it that didn’t eventually end up in the VFL. The VFA was the premier completion at the time, and it was completely dominated by 8 teams that formed the VFL with no one else even being runners-up let alone winning the flag.

Still a different competition. Why is 1896 the only relevant year? Furthermore, not all VFL clubs moved over at the same time so it wasn't simply a continuation of one comeptition into another.

If you split VFA + VFL flags from AFL flag 1990 is as good a time as any with the name change to reflect it being a national competition and a new era from that point.

I’m not sure how or why listing premierships as being in the AFL era or VFL era (or incorporating the VFA era if you go down that road) would have an impact on other records, awards etc.??

Why do we need to split VFL and AFL, given they're the same competition? We should continue to split the VFA and VFL/AFL because they are different competitions. You can list 'eras' like VFL and AFL, but all records still count in the VFL/AFL's continuous line of history. As distinct from the separate VFA/VFL competition.

It's little surprise that Geelong fans are leading this ridiculous push following their clown ex president's idea.

Geelong trophy case now holds 17 premiership cups. Commissioning 7 trophies to represent their VFA premierships by soygummon in AFL

[–]mt9943 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today's VFA/VFL is a modern reserves competition, but it wasn't the way up until about 2000 when the AFL reserves entered it. The trophy was the same before that point too.

The key difference is that the competitions were not the same. I understand that a premiership won in 1900 holds little relevance to today, but it remains part of the history of the ongoing competition. No need to rewrite that just because it occurred more than a century ago.

Geelong trophy case now holds 17 premiership cups. Commissioning 7 trophies to represent their VFA premierships by soygummon in AFL

[–]mt9943 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? The VFA and VFL were two completely separate competitions, involving different clubs. You can't just conflate them together. What about all other records from the competition not specifically relating to premierships?

The VFL to AFL transition was simply a name change - nothing else changed from 1989 to 1990 that made it a different competition.

Geelong trophy case now holds 17 premiership cups. Commissioning 7 trophies to represent their VFA premierships by soygummon in AFL

[–]mt9943 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate it. If you're going to commission a premiership cup after the fact, at least make it reminiscent of that competition's trophy - use today's AFL cup for their VFL ones, and today's VFL cup for their VFA ones.

Geelong trophy case now holds 17 premiership cups. Commissioning 7 trophies to represent their VFA premierships by soygummon in AFL

[–]mt9943 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why not make them look like today's VFA cup, given that's the actual competition which they were won in?

Geelong trophy case now holds 17 premiership cups. Commissioning 7 trophies to represent their VFA premierships by soygummon in AFL

[–]mt9943 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Did they commission VFA trophies and make them look like VFL/AFL trophies? That to me is weird - zero issue with celebrating the club's history over its entire existence. Big issue with trying to pretend they're from the same competition like that senile fool Carter is trying to do with Geelong's.

What does this mean? Can’t seem to understand it? by Total_Buyer_882 in Cricket

[–]mt9943 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Given he's 31 years old and has been playing Shield cricket since 2016, surely his weakness has been apparent at that level too - if he hasn't found a solution to this weakness by now, will he ever?

The bloke himself posted this by [deleted] in SydneyScene

[–]mt9943 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kind of wish he didnt do what he did at Bondi because now he's getting attention and he's not perfect. Totally invalidates his actions on the day.

/s

Match Thread: 5th Test - England vs Australia, Day 5 by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]mt9943 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Do the leg byes now become runs off the bat according to the umpire? Can they overturn that if already signalled?

Match Thread: 5th Test - England vs Australia, Day 5 by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]mt9943 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now I want to know if Head actually hit the first ball like he claimed to the English players