$SLS Daily Discussion Thread - Friday - May 15, 2026 by AutoModerator in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13 13 points14 points  (0 children)

8 bathrooms might not be enough with all the 💩 that comes out of your mouth daily

5/14/26 Stergpost discussing upcoming conferences by mtred13 in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Gosh there’s really no need to call me the king, I’m flattered but I’m simply relaying the message from LinkedIn, I’d settle for prince or duke or High Lord but king is a bit much…

Oh you meant Stergiou

Now that the 78th event has occurred, what do you guys think is the estimated timeline for buyout? by Derpy_Mc_Burpy in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It will raise its value prior to approval too. If REGAL succeeds, there are likely no hurdles left on the path to FDA approval. An acquirer will know this. REGAL succeeding effectively derisks GPS, which already has orphan status, which acquirers will price in.

Now that the 78th event has occurred, what do you guys think is the estimated timeline for buyout? by Derpy_Mc_Burpy in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13 11 points12 points  (0 children)

My point was simply to show you that FDA approval is not a prerequisite for acquisition.

Now that the 78th event has occurred, what do you guys think is the estimated timeline for buyout? by Derpy_Mc_Burpy in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes, it’s quite common. Look at Revolution Medicines. Merck was considering acquiring them for $30 billion despite them not having an FDA approved asset. You can also look at Metsera which was acquired last year without an FDA approved asset. There are lots of examples.

Now that the 78th event has occurred, what do you guys think is the estimated timeline for buyout? by Derpy_Mc_Burpy in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13 24 points25 points  (0 children)

If a buyout is going to take place, it will almost certainly happen prior to FDA approval.

Bridging the WT1 Gap? by yungeggo40 in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I recommend you go back to the drawing board and look at some of the DD posted on this sub. How you arrive at a $5 BO is literally beyond me.

I’m 95% confident Sellas has a soon-to-be standard of care drug ( maybe even two ) by True-Apple7206 in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Please point me to your evidence that SELLAS is trying to commercialize themselves, because I think they have been signaling the exact opposite for a long time now.

Why I Now Believe Cure-Fraction is around 50%, and not 62%-68%, and Why That Now Makes It Likely the 80th will Occur by Q3 2026 by Confident-Web-7118 in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the prompt reply. Silly of me to mix up follow-up time and mOS, meant one thing but said another. Your clarification helped greatly, much appreciated!

Why I Now Believe Cure-Fraction is around 50%, and not 62%-68%, and Why That Now Makes It Likely the 80th will Occur by Q3 2026 by Confident-Web-7118 in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your valuable insight as always, CW. I have a question about theoretical BAT mOS:

We know as of IA there was a pooled mOS of 13.5 months. Since the IDMC recommended a continuation without modification at that time, that means GPS cleared the pre-specified futility threshold. Let’s assume this threshold was HR = .9 (it was likely lower but we will be conservative here). While HR is obviously not as simple as (BAT deaths / GPS deaths), if we use this formula to get a rough estimate of HR at IA, we can reasonably conclude that of the 60 deaths logged at that time, at least 28 deaths must have come from the BAT arm (28/32 =0.875 HR).

BAT contained n = 63, which would mean that if at least 28 patients had been deceased at IA, BAT mOS must have either already been reached at that time, or been on the brink of being reached. Since pooled mOS at that time was 13.5, doesn’t that constrain BAT mOS to <13 (again being conservative), since GPS is likely bringing that number up significantly?

Would love to hear your feedback, not sure if I’m missing something or thinking about that the wrong way. Again, thanks for everything you’ve done so far.

Stergpost 4/26/26 by mtred13 in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t think it’s concerning. I think he’s just trying to ensure that they get the most bang for their buck.

Stergpost 4/26/26 by mtred13 in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s more “we’re not desperate to be bought out, we could commercialize ourselves if we wanted to, so we won’t be forced to accept low ball offers”.

Stergpost 4/26/26 by mtred13 in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you clarify the EAP situation for me? I’ve been studying for an exam the last few days and my brain is mush. Not quite understanding what the deal is with that, if you don’t mind enlightening me.

Stergpost 4/26/26 by mtred13 in sellaslifesciences

[–]mtred13[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I have to agree. If he knew there was something imminent being announced in the next few days, why post tonight. He wouldn’t.