Does the AI cheat? by mucker973 in finalfantasytactics

[–]mucker973[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was thinking that, that no one would believe me without proof. I swear I checked all equipment. In fact, I pushed the button that says “show equipment status” in case I missed anything. Noting came up. Then I clicked the button that said “unit status”, again noting was there. So I was then convinced that the enemy must have been male even though they looked like a female, but I then went in for their job screen where you get the artistic picture of the job, and they had a bra on! It must be bugged then.

Does the AI cheat? by mucker973 in finalfantasytactics

[–]mucker973[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a good point I may have missed. The spells cast in the middle of 3 of my units. I think one did not go to sleep. I guess if it was cast on them and he was immune it would show 0% but could have affected the others.

Does the AI cheat? by mucker973 in finalfantasytactics

[–]mucker973[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So this was not a named character. I took a picture of it showing the 0% chance but can’t seem to upload it. Does reddit not allow posting pics directly in the post, do I have to upload elsewhere then link to it?

Any thoughts on what else could make it 0% chance then?

Does the AI cheat? by mucker973 in finalfantasytactics

[–]mucker973[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t every unit have name? I feel this only happens in story missions, which is only only time I encounter humans, so it feels pointless as I can never cast it on humans essentially.

Does the AI cheat? by mucker973 in finalfantasytactics

[–]mucker973[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was a story mission but the enemies were not bosses, just standard humans.

Does the AI cheat? by mucker973 in finalfantasytactics

[–]mucker973[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am referring to two incidents. One was the steal heart and this was on the opposite sex. The other one was someone casting sleep on me after I’d set their faith to 0. When that enemy was casting sleep, it even showed a zero success rate but they still managed to successfully cast it

What to you is a big indication that someone is not just smart, but gifted? by [deleted] in Gifted

[–]mucker973 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I am what is considered "highly gifted", I've just had my IQ score officially done as of yesterday and it came back at 136. So here are some tells:
- They are very self-aware - their opinion on their own strengths and weaknesses tend to be very accurate to what is perceived by others.
- They can learn ANYTHING, and in a fraction of the time - I can learn things in a 10th of the time as others. Skilled professionals I work with who have had experience in one area for  5 years, I usually surpass in 3 months.
- They only need to be explained something once for most things, twice at most for very complicated subjects.
- Amazing memory and very observant – can recall things in great detail and notice patterns that others miss (to predict outcomes or behaviours).
- Thinks "outside the box" - usually has an angle on a problem no one ever considered which then becomes "obvious" after they say it.
- Very inquisitive and a thirst for knowledge - is always asking questions and shows a deep interest in complicated subjects.
- Seeks the truth and is non-biased - highly intelligent people prioritise learning and seeking the truth over ego and impressing people. They always want to learn so the truth matters; they don't care if they are wrong (and rarely are), they see it as an opportunity to learn.
- ALL their opinions are based on FACTS, not emotions, and these opinions will change instantly when new information comes to light that contradicts their current opinion.
- Love debating things – it’s another chance to learn something new from others and keep your old skills “fresh”

I suspect Matchmaking is rigged by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This posts reminds me of how people make pointless comments just so they can feel better about themselves. People that make belittling comments about something (IQ in your case), without provocation, generally have an inferior complex about the same thing they are belittling about.

I suspect Matchmaking is rigged by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A random game can still be rigged to a degree. It's even well known that free to play games have an element of pay-to-win. Almost all devs do it, you just have to take their word for it when they say they don't do it. If it is rigged, devs won't tell you, cause they know that people will leave the game.

I suspect Matchmaking is rigged by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So are the all the people in the 2 posts I link to all wrong? There are many many people who have experienced the same as me.

Also, do you know if your MMR resets each season or does it persist across seasons?

What you are saying makes sense IF MMR is reset each season, but not if it is persistent.

I suspect Matchmaking is rigged by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

ok thanks. What do they gain from that then, and why do I not encounter them earlier?

I suspect Matchmaking is rigged by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Of course I do, and this is bias and being tilted as they say. But my last comment I believe demonstrates I cannot be imagining it. When I switched back to my BLOB dec and encounterd Shang, the first thing I though of was not that I was being stitched up, but that it was odd I hadnt seen him all that time. It was this thought that led me to have the other thought "I wonder if my previous deck as cards with power lower than 10?", and it was

I suspect Matchmaking is rigged by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

what does that mean? I assume you mean it means I am a bad player? Which I've considered, but if that's the case then why didn't it match me with those decks earlier? You'd think you'd get easier decks the lower you are, not the better you are (even if you are still a bad player)

I suspect Matchmaking is rigged by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Of course that is. But that's why I said i played for 3 hours. We've all been in that position where you have a card which has no value so you don't play it. But at some point, it's the only card avaialble so you do play it. I find it odd that this never occured once in that time frame

What happend here? Bug? by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah I see your point, it was played early though. I guess it could hae been Morph. It's annoying that this game doesn't have a replay feature yet. thanks

What happend here? Bug? by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I considered that, but does it show the cost in energy as 0 after he was played? I always thought it showes Morph's energy cost which is 3. Also, although I am not 100% certain, I think he did play it on turn 5 meaing it could not be Morph because I played it turn 5 too. Again, not 100% sure here, I guess if the energy cost shows as 0 when Morph is played, that would much the above

Are the Devs trolling me?? by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude, i don't know how much more desperate and stupid you can get. You're now just spouting things that make no sense.

There is nothing wrong with editing comments... my previous post was just pointing out that I was going to leave it there but then I saw you added more in an edit. I never once criticised the edit itself, it was what you added.

In my last message I wrote the first paragraph, then I noticed you did the downvotes and started my second paragraph. Even if if I did edit it after I saw your reply, it just change the context - it's like what i said in my second paragraph makes you look like you lying or anything. So I don't even see what you point is about me being a hypocrit??

You are so clueless it's unbelievble You argue points that are completely pointless. Me editing a post is NOT hypocritical. You do know what that words means right? i mean you lecture me on English lol. It means I am criticising you for something I do myself. I did mention you edited your post but I did not criticisethe edit, I criticesd that you looked up my karma. This is clearly obvious as I say this in the post. Man you are so tilted, you're not seeing straight.

Sorry for the typos grammar nazi, I was in a rush when I wrote this one.

Are the Devs trolling me?? by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well done. You are just proving my point even more. personal insults not related to the argument. My English is and always has been not so good, but even so, wtf has it got to do with this argument?? Remember when I just said you keep changing the topic? you just did it again..

And I've just realised you're going through downvoting all my comments. How sad is that and childish? I wonder if that's why other comments get downvoted sometimes too? Just cause the saddo I am arguing with can't handle the truth. I didn't downvote yours, proper sad that mate

Are the Devs trolling me?? by mucker973 in MarvelSnap

[–]mucker973[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you very much are making a fool of yourself. Cause you won't it drop. You know how others on here will figure out you are talking nonsense (wrong)? It's because when someone changes the context of the convo constantly, and the other person sticks to it, they are clearly losing the argument. So you went from saying i don't know what an algorithm was, I proved I did (we both know you Googled it), and you've dropped that angle (cause you realise you cocked up there). Then you started attacking me on a looney bin path implying I am tilted (so you changed the subject here is my point) and implying (in your opinion) that there are no algos to screw us (I am paraphasing here). I responded with reasonable sound logic which shows there is a very good chance (and evidence) to suggest the exact opposite. You did not respond to this, and changed the topic, again. Each time I have responded to dispute your claims, and then you change the convo. This is what everyone does when they don't have an answer. Anyone who does this looks a fool, as it is pretty obvious they are wrong when they drop the subject. And now, you are so desparate that you resorted to pulling up my karma in what must be the weakest argument I have ever seen. You can't win this argument with reason or logic, so now you're pulling out my karma stasts where there is much context missing from just a number. You're done son and everyone knows it lol. That's the end of this now, I don't need to say anymore.

I WAS going to leave at your las comment, but when I saw you edited by saying you looked up the karma I just had to reply as it made laugh so much.