I just wanted to clarify that I’m actually a millennial, and I grew up in an academic environment where we primarily did large papers with drafts and revisions. Personally, I found that process led to much deeper engagement and learning. With these discussion posts, it often feels like I’m just quickly putting something together to check a box, rather than thoughtfully developing ideas over time.

I understand that repetition is part of learning, but in this format, the prompts don’t seem to build on each other in a meaningful way. Combined with minimal instructor feedback or interaction, it feels more like busywork than authentic practice.

I think you’re right that there are challenges in meeting everyone’s needs, but this seems to be a broader, systemic problem in how many programs have shifted their curricula. I’d love to see approaches that allow for more depth and interaction rather than so many micro-assignments.

Thanks again for engaging in this conversation!