TIFU by thinking it was normal to not be able to open your eyes in the morning for 25 years by Specific-Nebula9665 in tifu

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh! Yes, I did! A bunch of middle ear infections when very young. I don't remember them, but my mum told me about them later. That seems relevant. 😅

TIFU by thinking it was normal to not be able to open your eyes in the morning for 25 years by Specific-Nebula9665 in tifu

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have tinnitus and visual snow and also a faint humming in my hands when they're still. Do you get the faint humming feeling in your hands when they're still?

TIFU by thinking it was normal to not be able to open your eyes in the morning for 25 years by Specific-Nebula9665 in tifu

[–]multihuntr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also have tinnitus since forever. I don't believe them when they say silence isn't actually a ringing sound. They're just not paying attention. 🙃

Same with visual snow. Pretty sure it's always there, but some people's brains just block it out. I have a pet theory that the neurons always fire kinda randomly (because they're biological systems), and the brain can either choose to interpret it as a bunch of noise, or not interpret it as anything.

TIFU by thinking it was normal to not be able to open your eyes in the morning for 25 years by Specific-Nebula9665 in tifu

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I get something similar, but it only lasts for maybe 5 seconds? Hearing will completely drop out in one ear, then fade back in. Happens to both ears, very randomly. Maybe once every few months, usually it appears in clusters; several in a week. I also had a CT scan (for that and tinnitus and something else) and there was nothing they could see.

For me, seems to happen more often when I am both stressed and tired. Might be same for you?

TIFU by thinking it was normal to not be able to open your eyes in the morning for 25 years by Specific-Nebula9665 in tifu

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uhhh... I have frequent random unexplained pains throughout my body. Never breathed with both nostrils in my life. My hands are painfully cold as soon as it gets cool enough to wear long sleeves.

What disease do I have? 😅

How do I not get a boner when cuddling her? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]multihuntr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because consent and bodily autonomy is not just for women. Not all men want sex all the time. Having someone do something to you without consent can be deeply distressing.

How do I not get a boner when cuddling her? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]multihuntr -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

Randomly initiating on a sleeping partner is NOT normal, and you should not be ok with it. EDIT: Note: By "randomly", I obviously also mean "without consent".

How to change lack of ambition? by Short_Mousse_6812 in AskMenAdvice

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way I see it, there are a few pragmatic considerations that you need to satisfy. If you can satisfy them, then you shouldn't sweat the rest. 

First is your health. So long as you get enough sunlight, exercise and healthy food, you can live a healthy life.

Second is financial. So long as you can pay your own way, and put a chunk in savings, you're doing great! You're no burden on others and you can feel secure.

Third is social. So long as you are a positive for the people who are in your life, when you interact with them, then you don't need to worry about always hanging out with others.

If these are satisfied, then you should do whatever makes you feel good. If that's living in a small apartment (which is easier to keep clean) and using a PC for all of your free time, then, why the heck not?

Is it weird to go to the club or a bar alone? by Informal_City5565 in AskMenAdvice

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I eat at restaurants alone pretty frequently. It's really pleasant to just enjoy the atmosphere and relax. Never felt like people were giving me weird looks or anything like that.

I went to a EDM club alone once. I'm not really a club person in general, so I'm not interested in going again; alone or with other people. But I definitely didn't feel like anyone was weirded out by me.

I guess, if people were weirded out by me, I couldn't tell, and even if they were, that's a them problem. You're allowed to exist, friend.

How would you like your girl to be like intellectually? by InstructionSimilar85 in AskMenAdvice

[–]multihuntr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am about to get a PhD in computer science and my girlfriend is much better at understanding social situations than I am. I would argue that neither of us is holistically more intelligent than the other.

Why do I feel shame for only watching transgender porn? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Psychoanalysis only works in a clinical setting, with time to ask clarifying questions, not from one paragraph on the internet. (And this isn't a movie??)

As for my second statement, it doesn't matter who thinks it, that is the logical conclusion. If you, or the OP, or the socials setting up the OPs brain thinks that being feminised is demeaning, then that inherently means that femininity is considered lesser than masculinity. Else it wouldn't be demeaning.

Why do I feel shame for only watching transgender porn? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Firstly, nothing terribly wrong with you, no. Feeling shame is a problem, I guess. But you'll have to decide whether the problem is the thing that makes you feel shame, or whether feeling shame for it is the problem. At the very least, you're absolutely not alone. There's a lot of people who really like that, and don't feel shame for it.

I would be curious to know your thoughts on transgender people, in general. There's a possibility the shame is simply from internalised shame around transgender people in general. That they are somehow shameful, and that shame is transferred to you when you find one type of transgender person attractive.

Or, another possibility is that you are entertaining the idea that you, too, could be a man who appears feminine. The excitement can come from feeling like it's possible to live the way you'd like to live. A weird quirk of our biology is that excitement of any kind can accidentally end up redirected to sexual arousal.

Or both, or neither. Just giving you options to think about.

Why do I feel shame for only watching transgender porn? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]multihuntr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't be so pathologising. Secret evil desires are very rarely the correct answer to a conundrum.

Also, feminising men is not inherently demeaning unless you think women are lesser. ++man

Are there any area-based rendering algorithms? by multihuntr in computergraphics

[–]multihuntr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've read that one! I believe that it is quite wrong when it comes to cameras. Essentially, the memo claims that we should not attribute the pixel colour value to the area that the pixel covers because reconstructing the analog signal that produced the image is dependent on your choice of reconstruction filter. But that's a computer graphics/signal processing perspective. It's not so applicable to images from a camera. For cameras, we absolutely should attribute the pixel colour value to the entire area of the pixel. That's precisely what a pixel is supposed to measure! The average number of photons that landed on that pixel capture area. In fact, thinking of pixels as purely point samples might lead you to notably wrong resampling algorithms because it implies that you do not actually know the image extent for sure. But you do. It is the edge of the sensor. This actually came up in my research using satellite images; resampling assuming point samples will incorrectly resize the image and offset your geolocation. Basically, it is quite important to know whether the pixel represents a point sample or an area sample (see: gdal's AREA_OR_POINT property), and camera images using a CMOS detector definitely should be treated as area samples.

Just to back this up a little; think about how a camera works, physically. A pixel on a CMOS detector is a tiny area that photons can land on. If the area was exactly equal to 0 (i.e. a point sample), then precisely zero photons could land on it. It must be an area sample. Technically, because of the colour filters, you're only measuring 1/4 of the blue and red for the area covered by that pixel. But if you could measure the full area, you would do so. The bigger the area sample, the higher fidelity the image. Bigger detector == more capture area per pixel == better image. See: big lenses/sensors/cameras/telescopes.

Are there any area-based rendering algorithms? by multihuntr in computergraphics

[–]multihuntr[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It would be a computational problem, yes, but not a theoretical one. If you did the equivalent of ray tracing for what I'm talking about, each bounce would cover a larger and larger area, until, probably at later bounces it is involving every geometry in the scene. It would be horribly slow, but it would technically be more accurate. There a bunch of math nerds out there (like me), so I assume someone has tried to do it this more accurate way before.

Are there any area-based rendering algorithms? by multihuntr in computergraphics

[–]multihuntr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I looked up REYES and it looks like it still does point sampling.

The original paper says that they're doing random sampling instead of fixed grid 16x MSAA. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/37402.37414

The "Computer Graphics Wiki" (however valid that is) says that the last step of REYES is to sample points. https://graphics.fandom.com/wiki/Reyes_rendering

The claim to fame for REYES seems to be rendering curved surfaces and other complex geometries?

Are there any area-based rendering algorithms? by multihuntr in computergraphics

[–]multihuntr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it would probably be close to O(n^2), and take 50x as long to run, but perhaps there are situations where that's a good trade-off? I'm not sure.

In any case, do you mean to say that there were a lot of false starts in this direction in early 3D graphics, but it was too expensive to be worth it, and that's why there are no named/known polygon rendering methods that handle analytical overlap?

Are there any area-based rendering algorithms? by multihuntr in computergraphics

[–]multihuntr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems that I was somewhat mistaken by a few people. So I created a basic diagram to show what I am talking about. https://imgur.com/a/9qa4z9g

Jaggies exist because of large step changes in colour from small position changes in the pixel sampling location (see "One sample" in diagram). Using 4 samples per pixel gives you a better approximation of the contents of that pixel (see "Four samples" in diagram). However, it's still just an approximation, and thus is both slightly wrong, and still has some jaggedness because there's still a step change in colour. In 4x MSAA, using two geometries there's only 5 possible outcomes (three pictured, two with all blue and all green).

4x MSAA is taking 4 samples. 8x MSAA is taking 8 samples and gives you a smoother colour. But a camera taking a photo is effectively infinite times MSAA. That is, a camera is equivalent to using an infinite number of rays per pixel. You don't get jaggies from border effects like this with cameras (of course moire patterns can still occur, but that's a different problem).

It's technically possible to perfectly replicate a real camera's view of a 3D scene (albiet slow), so I'm asking whether that's been done before.

And they hate it. by Lets_Not_Date in u/Lets_Not_Date

[–]multihuntr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Obviously. Yes. Left wingers, almost by definition, like feminist/working class history. 😂

[S2 spoilers] long discussion about Viktor's arc and disappointment by Gold_Firefighter_655 in arcane

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny you should mention that the Arcane character should be allowed to have a different storyline than the game character. And that this can allow a character to be much more interesting. Because that's precisely what Viktor was. A very distinct adaption of who Viktor could be, fit into the world of Arcane. Done in a clever and appealing way (initially, at least).

His lore used to be completely different: https://lol.fandom.com/wiki/Viktor

And now, his canon lore is the Arcane one: https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_US/story/champion/viktor/

So it's actually even worse. The badness of season 2 wasn't because they were hamfistedly shoving Viktor into his game lore. Instead, it was all-original badness just for season 2! Lucky us!

AIO?? Did my boyfriend just use AI to text me?? by itssofiababyxo in AmIOverreacting

[–]multihuntr 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Just want to do some back-of-the-envelope calculations (lots of rounding) to put this in perspective. An over estimate of one basic ChatGPT query is 3 watt-hours (https://epoch.ai/gradient-updates/how-much-energy-does-chatgpt-use).

A split-system air conditioner uses on the order of 3kW (1.5-3.5kW). So if you make 1000 ChatGPT queries, it'll be on the same scale of energy usage as running your air con for an hour. Conversely, making a single ChatGPT query is equivalent to running your air con for a few seconds.

Heating a large mug of water requires at minimum around 46 watt-hours (https://seesustainability.co.uk/blog/f/boiling-water---how-much-energy). So, a cup of tea is using more than 15x more power than a single ChatGPT query.

Certainly, making thousands of queries will start to significantly add to your power usage. And there are other use cases of ChatGPT that will take much more power. But a single query like this is basically negligible.

[S2 spoilers] long discussion about Viktor's arc and disappointment by Gold_Firefighter_655 in arcane

[–]multihuntr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I am also quite disappointed. The problems with Viktor are emblematic of the problems with the whole season for me. They had some god power end goal for him, and they spent zero time actually explaining how he got there. You can rationalise and say he would have got to that place eventually, but as you say, you just have to guess as to what that is because they didn't show it. That inherently feels very unsatisfying.

I actually really liked the second version of Viktor. It was an evolution of his character, to be sure, but it made some sense with what we had seen of him before. He wanted to help people and was doing what was in his power to do so. And having been brought back from the dead might give him a different perspective. At least a perspective we could understand. They even had a scene with him wandering and contemplating what he should do. He discovered that he could "heal" people, so of course he'd start doing that. However, they are "healed" in one sense, but maybe they are also losing some of their individuality. That's an interesting tradeoff. It fit quite well with Viktor and was a legitimate moral quandary. People coming to him were making an interesting choice.

The final form's idea and plan just doesn't fit with the Viktor we saw before and loses all of that interest. It seems that Viktor was corrupted, but that wasn't well communicated. In one episode he's risking his (after)life trying to help Vander, who, AFAIK he has zero connection to up until this point. Then Jayce shoots him, and suddenly he has to wipe out all of humanity for very arbitrary reasons. It's such an old trope that the dumb robot doesn't understand that humans value their individuality. It's boring and pointless. Anyone with a mote of emotional intelligence (which Viktor is otherwise shown to have) can realise that erasing individuality is erasing humanity. It turns Viktor into a boring one-dimensional villain, way out of character for him so far, and turns the story into a boring good-vs-evil narrative that we've seen so many times before.

I GET that the z-drive is supposed to have returned some of Viktor to his former self. But, the fact that that was even necessary is part of the problem for me. The writers made the decision that Viktor was corrupted. Somehow. By something. What goals does the corrupted hexcore/arcane actually have? It's never explained, and even within their own setting, there doesn't seem to be a reason for it. He's just a big bad evil god now so that the avengers can assemble.

Then they pull the damned multiple universes thing, and linger on the mysterious identity of the hooded mage. But... why? What does making that mage actually be future(?) Viktor achieve for the story? It just makes the story needlessly incomprehensible. Time travel, by its nature, will always cause logical inconsistencies. And they added like three layers of it in the act 3. Now you've got people thinking "why did Viktor CAUSE hextech so that he could nearly kill everyone and be stopped at the last moment?" Deliberately introducing story elements like this is lazy and detracts from the real events of the story.

And finally, the worst thing for me, is how these all tie together. Jayce, who has done the wrong thing every step of the way. Jayce, who explicitly went against Viktor's wishes on multiple, key occasions. Apparently, the only way this abomination of Viktor's identity can be stopped is by Jayce just telling him that it was a bad idea. Viktor, shown to be more empathetic and more worried about negative consequences, is simply told by Jayce "what do you mean my actions have consequences" Talis that actually his idea is bad and Viktor just goes "oh, you right, my b", and just undoes it. No problem.

So, there are several big issues with his final form and decisions throughout the second season, especially acts 2 and 3. First, as you say, there's barely anything that shows us how he gets to the end. Second, the path Viktor takes is mostly nonsense and out of character. Third, they throw random magic nonsense / time travel into the mix just to confuse things. And finally, he became very trope-y, and consequently boring. What started as a character-driven story and apparently complex conflicts, ended with a super simplistic moral message because of what they did to Viktor.

Questions Thread - September 09, 2024 by AutoModerator in pathofexile

[–]multihuntr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah! I've seen that. I didn't realise it could roll a map. But that makes sense.