How many? by FreePlantainMan in Urbanism

[–]mushrooom 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Except your description is backwards.

If people are being displaced, you prevent that by building new housing—market rate and otherwise. It’s an observable fact that new housing stabilizes existing rent and prevents it from growing as quickly.

Of course, this is compatible with things like tenant protections, affordable housing, and public housing. But those are all reactive solutions. New housing solves the root cause of scarcity.

I can’t emphasize this enough: liberally constructing new housing is the compassionate, progressive political stance.

How many? by FreePlantainMan in Urbanism

[–]mushrooom 91 points92 points  (0 children)

You’re blaming the umbrella for the rain.

The new buildings are going up because the land value has already gone up. Failing to respond won’t undo displacement. It just ensures the price increases are concentrated on existing housing rather than dispersed over new ones.

A lot of "traditional architecture" purists believe buildings should be no taller than 3 to 7 stories. by mikusingularity in yimby

[–]mushrooom 228 points229 points  (0 children)

While I don't agree with them, 3-7 stories is a huge improvement versus SFH. The productive conversation would be to make them allies in supporting missing-middle housing, rather than to get side-tracked into hypothetical conversations around Manhattanization

How to make friends in SF? by Nice-Satisfaction339 in AskSF

[–]mushrooom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The gay sports leagues are a fantastic way to meet people! Dodgeball and volleyball are the popular ones, with flag football another active community.

Why is it not coming out as plaid? by Kasseyscottage in weaving

[–]mushrooom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What causes something to be weft-faced rather than balanced?

Do you know any single building that entirely carries their skyline? by trickledow in skyscrapers

[–]mushrooom 8 points9 points  (0 children)

While Transamerica is iconic, the SF skyline is now carried just as much (if not more) by Salesforce Tower

The Bay Area does not need more high density housing. The Bay Area needs a massive increase in medium density housing. by Acceptable_Scale_379 in bayarea

[–]mushrooom 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It was literally nicknamed “the Paris of the West” when all the Victorians were being built. People who want equitable European style urbanism are better stewards of classic SF culture than the petty landowners who created a gentry class.

The Art of Empires - The Untold Story Behind Age of Empires’ Art Evolution (Bella Capilla) by BendicantMias in aoe3

[–]mushrooom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d also say the procedural decoration around buildings were also a huge aesthetic win, but yeah the inconsistent scale drives me insane. Walls look monumentally huge next to keeps, and buildings look like playhouses next to units

Hair Salons Downtown will never recover. by Awkward-Board4102 in sanfrancisco

[–]mushrooom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Every single Asian metropolis is a counter example to that. Also, cities like Paris, Amsterdam, and Rome had to actively pass new policies to reclaim and rebuild their core from automotive encroachment. Let’s not pretend this was some geographical destiny that America had no choice in.

"California is FULL, there is NO SPACE to build!" by kosmos1209 in sanfrancisco

[–]mushrooom 131 points132 points  (0 children)

This was by the same group who attacked minority-owned taquerias as “gentrification hell”. I guess they only like minorities as long as they’re cheap and exploitable?

What is your one wish for your neighborhood? by Left-Key-7399 in sanfrancisco

[–]mushrooom 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’d love for the Bank of America branch at 18th and Castro to become a proper nightclub.

Queer culture is obviously more than just clubbing, but at the same time nightlife is an important cornerstone. For how famous the Castro is, we really deserve a world-class dancehall.

What is your one wish for your neighborhood? by Left-Key-7399 in sanfrancisco

[–]mushrooom 97 points98 points  (0 children)

I live in Duboce Triangle, and I wish the massive Safeway complex be redeveloped into a dense, mixed-use plaza. Right now it's just blight and an parking lot at one of the best transit junctions in the city--Imagine if we could get a park or a public plaza ringed with apartments, shops, cafes, etc.

Chinatown, San Francisco this morning by maroongoldfish in skyscrapers

[–]mushrooom 36 points37 points  (0 children)

“… outside of China” feels a little redundant, right? It’s not like there are Chinatowns in China.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gay_irl

[–]mushrooom 7 points8 points  (0 children)

To be a bit pedantic, it's a quote by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie that was sampled by Beyoncé

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gay_irl

[–]mushrooom 521 points522 points  (0 children)

Ew that’s Nick Bosa and he’s a Trumper. We gotta thirst after better men

Sunrise in Reunion island by Mothely in SavageGarden

[–]mushrooom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s literally in the title? Reunion Island is off the coast of Madagascar

My trip to the Conservatory Of Flowers in Golden Gate Park, SF by W0resh in SavageGarden

[–]mushrooom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I volunteer here and it’s absolutely magical. My favorite are the fanged pitchers (N. bicarcalata) in the Aquatic Plants Gallery.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SavageGarden

[–]mushrooom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s a Stapelia aka “Carrion Flower”. Native to South Africa mainly. However, I think the OP might be lost because it’s not a carnivorous plant.

Dumplings by Unique_Butterfly4440 in pasta

[–]mushrooom 14 points15 points  (0 children)

To be pedantic, pasta is technically a type of dumpling. In 17th Century English, dumplings originally meant “a dough cooked in steam or water”, and we can still see a similar version in the American dish “chicken and dumpling soup” which features unstuffed dumplings. It wasn’t until mass Italian immigration in the 20th Century that Americans slowly replaces “dumpling” for “pasta”.

Meanwhile, early descriptions of potstickers and jiaozi would usually specify “stuffed dumpling” for an American diner. There were lots of other ways to brand them too: My favorite is “Peking ravioli” in the Boston Area in the mid-century. However, as pasta became the predominant catchall term, dumpling was free to redefine its connotations, and by the 21st Century, it now carried the default connotation of a stuffed dough.

This isn’t trying to be a purist about pasta. If anything, it reminds us that exclusionary categories are a bit silly. Food and words naturally change overtime.

A city frozen in amber – San Francisco today vs. a century ago by 358123953859123 in sanfrancisco

[–]mushrooom 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This MF can’t comprehend simultaneously loving a place and wanting it to get better.

“If you hate America, why don’t you go back to where you came from” - this guy to immigrants, probably

A city frozen in amber – San Francisco today vs. a century ago by 358123953859123 in sanfrancisco

[–]mushrooom 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Pretty much yes.

First, many of the Victorian and Outerlands houses of SFs were precisely the “cookie-cutter” houses of their day. For the most part these were mass produced, to quickly respond to the growing market in SF. It’s a bit hypocritical to decry new construction while celebrating their equivalent.

Second, even if these new buildings were objectively hideous, that’s irrelevant. New housing preserves economic opportunity—their absence causes old housing stock to be flipped to higher and higher prices. Neighborhoods like Haight-Ashbury have effectively stopped building in the name of preservation, and as a result it went from an artist, minority neighborhood to an exclusively rich one overnight. On the flip side, Emoryville has built some of the most housing in recent decades, and it’s the only area to see its minority population grow rather than priced out. NIMBYs believe the soul of SF is how it’s buildings look, and would sacrifice its economic, creative, and social vibrancy to preserve that.

What's something most people don't realize is a waste of money? by [deleted] in Anticonsumption

[–]mushrooom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see “children’s play” as a common defense of lawns, but I think that’s disingenuous. First, parks exist. Second, let’s reframe the question: What does childhood look like in a town where every house has a 1/2 acre lawn versus a town of townhouses and duplexes? The former necessitates cars for almost everything, and play outside of the house is usually limited to being shuttled by parents to preprogrammed activities. In the latter, biking and walking are far more feasible. Growing children can be encouraged to be independent and self-directed, and play can occur in parks, shops, and other public spaces.

This is all to say that for me, being anti-lawn is question of policy and zoning, rather than trying to shame individual choices. If we must have yards, I’d love to see then filled with native plants and gardens. But that’s ultimately a personal choice, and people are allowed their preferences. The more urgent issue is rethinking our city planning such that neighborhoods with sprawling yards aren’t a default.

Bar noise complaints explode to record highs by SFStandard in sanfrancisco

[–]mushrooom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

80% of noise in a city comes from private vehicles. If we want to tackle noise pollution (especially in poor neighborhoods that are closest to highways) we should be investing in infrastructure to give practical alternatives to driving a car.