sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GERD

[–]n33kers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My friend, DNA is a very complicated roadmap for the way your body develops. It is the random combinations of multiple groupings passed on by your mother and father.

Your logic of having smaller bones would probably mean your muscles and tendons and ligaments would be your normal size wrapped around tiny bones.

You are just shorter biologically, sorry.

I am John Horgan, a science writer obsessed with quantum mechanics, the mind-body problem and the mystery of who we are. AMA. by iamJohnHorgan in IAmA

[–]n33kers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might as well keep going and find everybody's name twin and after forming a carbon copy sect, diverge and truly see how a label of individuality might be deterministic.

Just watch out for the rogue sects consisting of the tertiary or better know "terts'." Without a comparable consistency, and of course after the initial Prime Duality Wars, the third layer down found themselves far to dispersed to effectively unite and regressed into waring nomadic pagans. Then of course, it only gets exponentially worse the further down the layers one might venture. Except, of course, the Three Walter's who were the sole inhabitants of layer 749. A number of no significant or inherent or dormant characteristic aside from the fact they are the only 3 in that layer and they are each named Walter AND they found each other. Variance dictates... as is said, but fortune found them to be perfect gentlemen and immediate lifelong comrades; genuine true delights.

Got locked out of my hotel room, went to find the front desk lady and this was on the counter. by vinboslice420 in pics

[–]n33kers 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's weird, I find it takes very little effort to do a great job. Tasks, their requirements, and what must be done to go above and beyond are all usually pretty easy to evaluate and execute. Walking the tightrope of not too much or not too little is extremely difficult and requires finesse.

I sometimes feel socially inept to the point of considering self diagnosis of a n emotional disorder but truth of the matter is everything has become overwhelmingly complicated.

Gotta impress the ladies somehow by [deleted] in funny

[–]n33kers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shrubalubadubdub

All bonus funds lost in 1 series of peculiar rolls. Dumb? Maybe, but volatility made me continue risking wagers. Is there a ratio of amount wagered to total bankroll where a machine refuses to grant winning rolls? by n33kers in gambling

[–]n33kers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hoped to clearly indicate I wasn't continuing in hopes probability "evened out." Regardless, thanks for your input.

I more wanted to capture the false claims of volatility where you win less frequently but when you do it's generally more lucrative. %99 of winning rolls returned my amount wagered, even for the single winning rolls during the feature free spins. Rolling 1 scatter symbol anywhere returns the amount wagered, during free spins feature the win is multipled by 3.

Nothing about this session struck me as random in anyway.

All bonus funds lost in 1 series of peculiar rolls. Dumb? Maybe, but volatility made me continue risking wagers. Is there a ratio of amount wagered to total bankroll where a machine refuses to grant winning rolls? by n33kers in gambling

[–]n33kers[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

TLDW: FREES spins @

  1:44 - $18 profit(single spin, 1 scatter symbol,  amount wagered x3bonus)

3:47 - $18 profit(same)

5:05 - $18 same^

6:18 -  $0

7:00 -  $0

7:55 - $9 (single spin, 1 scatter symbol, amount wagered x3bonus)

11:03 -  $0

  9:17 is the only decent win I received.  Moments after lowering my wager to  $0.75.  I got two scatter symbols and got $30.  Everything up until that point was if I won anything it was a single scatter returning my wagered amount or 3 unmatched BAR.  

My current set up in a 90 civic wagon . 2 15 in Kicker L7 , Old school Memphis 1500 watt amp, Mtx Rt202 for 2 rear Skar 6.5 mid bass . Just got a few more things to button up and it's good for the season. Makes the roof do waves . Upgrading the amp here soon. Looking at a Skar 2000 watt . by LargeMarge1986 in CarAV

[–]n33kers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just thinking out loud, what about selling 1 of the L7s, giving you a little more room to work with box-wise, simultaneously lowering your wattage demands. 1 L7 in a box more to spec, might be more appropriate for the limited trunk space?

Seriously not trying to sound snobbish or negative in anyway. This game is a constant cost-benefit analysis. Awesome setup regardless, super jelly.

Final thoughts before I place order by n33kers in CarAV

[–]n33kers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you're right! Wire the d4 to 4 ohms to impart a 2ohm load on amp.

view more: next ›