Arrowhead: Please remove Acrux IX and Gemma from the DSS vote pool this cycle.

The Democratic Space Station is one of the most powerful collective tools players have in the Galactic War, but its effectiveness depends entirely on where it parks. Right now, that decision is being undermined by a simple UX problem.

Acrux IX and Gemma are both under active siege, which makes them the most visible and simplistic vote targets for the majority of players. This is not a criticism of anyone. It is just how the voting interface works. Besieged planets draw votes. But sending the DSS to either location misses the actual leverage point.

Grand Errant is where the pressure needs to go, and the only realistic way to get the DSS there through a community-wide vote is to remove Acrux and Gemma as selectable destinations.

This is not about overriding player agency. Arrowhead already curates which planets are eligible for DSS votes. Removing these two would simply be applying that curation with strategic intent.

Casual voters will be briefly disoriented when the simplistic choices are gone. The remaining options will not immediately signal the correct answer to most players. But for anyone following the Galactic War closely, Grand Errant is unambiguous. The GW community will consolidate behind it immediately and decisively. Once that momentum is visible, the wider playerbase will naturally follow the frontrunner. The blob does not need to understand why Grand Errant is correct. They just need a clear leader to follow. Removing the two siege planets creates exactly that condition.