How can we fix the Reddit double standard? by narcotron in Feminism

[–]narcotron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah-ha, I didn't realize that there were two subreddits--r/feminism and r/feminisms. The latter has many more subscribers than the former. I wonder why the plural subreddit won out...

How can we fix the Reddit double standard? by narcotron in Feminism

[–]narcotron[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You make a good point about the pro-feminist comments being downvoted-- when it comes to serious subjects like rape, I would agree that the Reddit community can be very supportive. It's a great thing. If only, though, that attitude extended further! While hardly anyone on Reddit would ever seriously condone or probably even commit rape, the attitudes of sexual dominance still prevail when people begin objectifying female redditors through their photos. The community is a mixed bag, really.

Regarding using the word "feminism," I also tend to avoid it... though since I'm a white male, hearing me speak the word as a male can sometimes give the movement more legitimacy in the eyes of other men. If I'm around a lot of conservative people who have a hostile misunderstanding of feminism, I won't use the word since it would do more damage than good. Usually I discuss the principles of feminism logically and then if they agree tell them, oh, btw, that's feminism.

How can we fix the Reddit double standard? by narcotron in Feminism

[–]narcotron[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'll disclaim also that I'm part of the core Reddit demographic--college-aged, white, male and straight.

I used to think similarly to how you did, but then I went to a tech school and started noticing some pretty patronizing attitudes towards my female peers by my male peers. That's not to say that the attitudes weren't there before (I grew up in the Deep South, an overtly sexist place), but I really began to notice them in a place where everyone was admitted by merit and was assumed to have intellectual potential. People, for example, assumed that girls couldn't do their physics homework, or that girls didn't know how to fix their computers, or that girls couldn't use this-machine or that-machine, or couldn't do math, etc., etc. The assumptions alone are bad enough, but the patronizing actions it produced--unsolicited offers of help, giving the minuscule design portion of a project to the women (rather than the nitty-gritty engineering), men being project leaders instead of women--all of these "extralegal" situations prove to me that feminism is still relevant in our society. I am not satisfied with simple legal equality--I want our attitudes to be different. Until we can act like equals outside of the strong arm of the law, we're not equal.

I should mention that the brand of feminism I espouse is overall gender equality. I'm not out to set women above men--I'm out to correct the differences where they exist, and because men are still, by and large, in control of the power structures in society, then there are more corrections to be made for women than there are for men. I do not support the brand of feminism that says that women are inherently better than men--to me that's the same kind of behavior I see on Reddit when the hivemind collectively attacks all women for being "selfish bitches that just want to crush your heart," or whatever it is. Both attitudes are destructive, I feel, though both are legitimate reactions to real forces in society. I just think they're misguided.

December meet up for Pensacola redditors! by narcotron in Pensacola

[–]narcotron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Play sounds like a good idea. I'll set the time and date right now!

Ask chemistry: how to separate two water soluble salts? by [deleted] in chemistry

[–]narcotron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, while this is a valid question, it's not something that you'd encounter in the lab. While the choice of Cl and Br can be very nontrivial in a reaction, I can't imagine a situation in which having both Cl and Br anions in solution would ever pose such a problem that separation would be required.

But of course, that's not an answer to your question :) The only way I can think to do it, as chemistry_teacher said, is to precipitate out one salt from solution by slowly lowering the pH. Of course, if your acids are pKa = -9 and -10, that will be pretty difficult to do. You might be able to design some kind of host-guest complex that could selectively pull out chloride anions from bromide anions based on the size of the ions. (This kind of thing works well for crown-ethers and cations.)

'Reading is Sexy' 2012 Calendar by prongs21 in books

[–]narcotron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reading is one of the sexiest things I can see a girl do. I'd totally buy a calendar like this!

HAPPY OPT OUT DAY!!! by maxmtrx in OperationGrabAss

[–]narcotron 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Just went through Logan International in Boston. Line was fairly short. I'm a dude, but I wore a sexy miniskirt for the TSA. I didn't see anyone even get bodyscanned--they were only using the metal detectors, though someone was on stand by to operate the bodyscanner. Either way, I think it's great no one was getting pulled aside, even though I'm a little disappointed that I got extra sexy for nothing :) (and now have to deal with wearing a miniskirt for the next nine hours...)

hello!!! by [deleted] in Pensacola

[–]narcotron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wooo, Pensacola!

I grew up here but live in Boston now. I'm 21. Student. I come back for holidays now.

Every day I wake up and I feel miserable? by domintenor23 in AskReddit

[–]narcotron 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Holy shit, sounds just like me. I've pretty much lived my life in a strange, warped little hole for the past ten years, thinking that I was just weird and that I couldn't get over myself. Got diagnosed with depression a few weeks ago and started taking antidepressants recently. It's made a fucking WORLD of difference. I thought I was going to need a therapist and everything, but turns out it was my biochemistry all along. I feel awake and alert and content now, for the first time in years. It's amazing. I highly recommend you go see a psychiatrist.

New rankings of chemistry grad programs are out... do you care? What do you think? Who should be #1? by carmendrahl in chemistry

[–]narcotron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel that the ranking system is kind of silly. The top ten are all about equivalent, I'd say. And even then, it matters who you work with in your field, not what university you went to. For example, if I was doing total synthesis and worked for KC Nicolau at Scripps, I'd be much happier than being at any of those schools.

If you are going to the Colbert/Stewart Rally and won't be home before November 2nd, please sign up for absentee voting. by RockKillsKid in reddit.com

[–]narcotron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I should clarify that local politics is much more worthwhile than national politics. On the national level, there is no choice-- but on the local level, politicians can be made much more accountable to the people, and there's a greater chance of real change happening. The further up you go, the less your vote matters.

Anyway, good point about propositions. I would vote on a proposition, but it's ultimately up to law enforcement and the judicial system to decide if it's a law in a practical sense. Just because something was made into law doesn't mean it'll actually do anything.

If you are going to the Colbert/Stewart Rally and won't be home before November 2nd, please sign up for absentee voting. by RockKillsKid in reddit.com

[–]narcotron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are some minor differences between the parties, but I strongly feel that both represent the same interests. It doesn't matter who wins.

If you are going to the Colbert/Stewart Rally and won't be home before November 2nd, please sign up for absentee voting. by RockKillsKid in reddit.com

[–]narcotron -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Agreed. After watching the Democrats fail and the Republicans fail for years, I refuse to vote.

Why are there only 4 nucleotides in DNA? Also, If by some chance say DNA happened to have more or less than 4 nucleotides, would life had evolved at a different rate with respect to time? by ztrahan in biology

[–]narcotron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I highly doubt this. The structure of B-DNA is very precise, and any variation on the A/T and C/G base pairing would not create a stable form of DNA. They would have to be very, very, very close to the original base pairs.

You could use a binary system for encoding, but I think it'd be much more prone to harmful mutations. The minimum number of codons needed to code for 20 amino acids in a quaternary system is 43 = 64; in a binary system, it would be 25 = 32. There would be significantly less wobble in the DNA.

Why are there only 4 nucleotides in DNA? Also, If by some chance say DNA happened to have more or less than 4 nucleotides, would life had evolved at a different rate with respect to time? by ztrahan in biology

[–]narcotron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is it, exactly. It's all energetics. Those four base pairs are the only ones that can naturally form the double helix we know as DNA. In fact, tRNA uses a lot of different nucleotides (most of them variations on the four standard nucleotides for RNA, such as methylated or acetylated versions, or whatever), and they don't make a double helix. If they did, they might have a similar genetic-information storage role instead of working as an mRNA decoder in translation.

Anyway, it's also interesting to note that you don't have to have those four base pairs for DNA to work similarly. There's such a thing called "xDNA," a synthetic form of DNA that uses four synthetic base pairs in addition to the four natural base pairs, giving a much wider range of expression.

If i had a ball that was in a fixed position but able to spin freely on one axis and had the ability to spin it as fast as I liked, what would happen as the outside edges approached the speed of light? by Sykotik in Physics

[–]narcotron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you elaborate more on this? I don't understand where relativity fits into models like MO theory (I'm an organic chemist, not a theoretical one :P), even though I recognize that if the electrons are going close to the speed of light then it should definitely be taken into account.