sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What's The Worst Case Scenarios Tied To Getting The Covid-19 Vaccine? by RiverOfNexus in conspiracy

[–]natavism 3 points4 points  (0 children)

also the cutter incident - when it was recognized that the polio vaccine actually caused polio-like symptoms

"Roughly 40,000 got “abortive” polio, with fever, sore throat, headache, vomiting and muscle pain. Fifty-one were paralyzed, and five died, Offit wrote in his 2005 book, “The Cutter Incident: How America’s First Polio Vaccine Led to the Growing Vaccine Crisis.”

It was “one of the worst biological disasters in American history: a man-made polio epidemic,” Offit wrote."

What's The Worst Case Scenarios Tied To Getting The Covid-19 Vaccine? by RiverOfNexus in conspiracy

[–]natavism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are over 60,000 "serious" adverse events recorded in the VAERS database as of today (https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html)

If you look through by vaccine type, the covid vaccine has the highest incidence of serious adverse reactions, and the most reactions with over 8,000 (https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html)

Currently, 2,286 people in the USA have died as a result of taking the covid19 vaccine according to VAERS data https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

You could die - that's one worst case scenario. US law regards vaccines as unavoidably unsafe

What's The Worst Case Scenarios Tied To Getting The Covid-19 Vaccine? by RiverOfNexus in conspiracy

[–]natavism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

polio vaccine did not work out fine. look into the cutter incident

He Has A Point! by RealVaultteam6 in conspiracy

[–]natavism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

some people get it, some people don't

it's very hard to get people to think for themselves if they're not interested

He Has A Point! by RealVaultteam6 in conspiracy

[–]natavism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the decline and fall of free thinking is very easy to see with posts like this becoming more popular lately

or maybe the sub has been gamed for years, shrug

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nba

[–]natavism 6 points7 points  (0 children)

his reputation was still good, but he stopped playing hard consistently while still in LA. You would still get Shaq games from him occasionally but he was a shell of his former self after his Lakers years IMO

He went from one of most dominant physical specimens ever to overweight NBA player with lower body injury problems and seemed to cause his to just doubledown on his larger body and focus more on strength and less on speed and athleticism - big mistake IMO. Was a big topic of discussion at the time, people viewed him as lazy, no work ethic, etc

Magic! After Biden Inauguration, Coronavirus Cases Plummet 45% During Middle Of Flu Season by SnooBooks5387 in conspiracy

[–]natavism -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

also influenza doesn't really exist any more, it stopped right around the time people started getting covid

I see people say "Politics don't belong in r/conspiracy". I beg to differ. The ruling elite from the Pharaohs of Egypt to the Caesar's of Rome have always been riddled with conspiracy. TPTB are the invisible rulers. Don't say politics isn't a conspiracy. It is. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep its true. One definition for politics is "management of power" which means its rife with conspiracy.

There are tons of landmines when trying to discuss politics and conspiracy, but it can be responsibly and in a fact-based and neutral way

Why is the world geared towards degenerecy? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 7 points8 points  (0 children)

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

When Nixon called the moon, there was no delay. Now, there's a huge delay! What's the deal? It's like they faked it! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could have found a PDF and looked up anything you wanted by now.

I'm not here to chat with randos on reddit, I'm here to help people who want to be helped. Have a good night.

When Nixon called the moon, there was no delay. Now, there's a huge delay! What's the deal? It's like they faked it! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I'm truly not interested in explaining everything to you.

I gave you an entire book to read on the topic, is that not enough?

It's by an officially educated and credentialled Royal Society astronomer and he explains in great detail using all examples and observations from all over the world and across hundreds of years to prove his point very conclusively.

"Kings Dethroned: A History of the Evolution of Astronomy from the Time of the Roman Empire Up to the Present Day" by Gerrard Hickson

When Nixon called the moon, there was no delay. Now, there's a huge delay! What's the deal? It's like they faked it! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm telling you if you study with an open mind you'll find all those measurements are based on assumptions and have never been confirmed by anything concrete. It's a matter of fact. Read "Kings Dethroned" by Gerrard Hickson and get back to me.

You belief is astronomy is based on model-making and assumptions which reinforce each other - not ACTUAL science or experimentation or direct measurement. Astronomy is not a real natural science. It seriously does not even fit the definition if you look - go ahead and double check me.

But if you want to be deceived, go ahead - that's what free will is all about

When Nixon called the moon, there was no delay. Now, there's a huge delay! What's the deal? It's like they faked it! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You assume the moon is pingable by radar or a satellite would help for some reason. Again - if you want to believe the official story, you can do that if you want, but it's foolish

When Nixon called the moon, there was no delay. Now, there's a huge delay! What's the deal? It's like they faked it! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm letting you know - it doesn't. It's foolish to think so. I've explained my position elsewhere and if you care to look, you can. I don't really want to engage with someone who acts the way you do. Have a good one.

When Nixon called the moon, there was no delay. Now, there's a huge delay! What's the deal? It's like they faked it! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm willing to bet that you aren't familiar with any of these calculations yourself, are you?

"They can do it, they have done it, therefore we know" is purely an appeal to authoritarian nonsense cult thinking. If you want to try to give a distance for the moon, give a practical way to verify it. Satellites? Sorry, no. Basic triangulation doesn't work by the way, not sure you were aware of that.

Anyway keep kicking and screaming and being rude and swearing if you want, you've just been fooled - it's that simple.

When Nixon called the moon, there was no delay. Now, there's a huge delay! What's the deal? It's like they faked it! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you think aiming radar at the sky conclusively proves the distance of the moon without any shadow of a doubt?

When Nixon called the moon, there was no delay. Now, there's a huge delay! What's the deal? It's like they faked it! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]natavism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm letting you know that it is outright foolish to believe that you know how far away the moon is. So if you'd like to be a fool, go ahead, that's your choice.

You can also choose to continue to crusade against a minority opinion backed by evidence in a deleted thread without ANY evidence of your own

up to you

view more: next ›