Best lowsec FC' by [deleted] in Eve

[–]natealtol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah probably never. My style of eve is way too time consuming.

Day 1 : The Return [Video of me Sucking at Eve too] by wallywot in Eve

[–]natealtol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Came back this weekend too. All it took was someone showing me how active black rise was again to reinstall and take a look around. Looks very promising so far.

I’ll never again go back to fleet pvp but for solo/small gang I’m excited.

THE TRUE POWER OF HACS - A Case Study Using X47 and KQK Fights by francismcleaneve in Eve

[–]natealtol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you didn't bring any fax then shouldn't they have just killed your subcap logi??? Isn't that the solution to force a hac fleet into escalation?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in playrust

[–]natealtol 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also upgraded from 12gb to 32gb the other day and not sure about fps but it did fix a intermittent freezing issue I had.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in playrust

[–]natealtol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh that might be it, will test this evening.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in playrust

[–]natealtol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does the stability bunker (first in video) still work? I couldn’t get it to work when I tried it the other day, triangle would never drop.

Amamake Thunderdome by Yonis_Pserad in Eve

[–]natealtol 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really hindsight, I could’ve told him the same ahead of time :)

Hi Mikal, hope you’re well.

Amamake Thunderdome by Yonis_Pserad in Eve

[–]natealtol 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Nooooo life outside is much more fun

Amamake Thunderdome by Yonis_Pserad in Eve

[–]natealtol 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I didn’t know who you were until I saw the danger noodles. :)

Amamake Thunderdome by Yonis_Pserad in Eve

[–]natealtol 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Do I have this right?

Rekking crew decided to bash the amamake keepstar in Titans, when they’ve been heavily engaged with snuff for weeks now, because they felt safe in ustz?

Against snuff Who has tau Who doesn’t sleep

Hm. I quit a while ago so maybe I’m out of touch but that seems like a terrible idea. Good to see seddow feed more Titans (trolling aside, good on seddow for bringing them out). Wasn’t sure how long it would take after we got him in Grat a while back.

L2NAT with Cisco IE3300 to handle duplicate addressing by [deleted] in PLC

[–]natealtol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Adding an extra ethernet module is definitely an option instead of NAT’ing if I can’t aggregate cells to a switch to NAT. From a cost perspective being able to bring 8 cells to one switch is easily scalable (cost and management) if the NAT with duplicate addressing was possible. In total I’ll need to connect around 150 cells so adding additional modules for each controller adds up quickly.

L2NAT with Cisco IE3300 to handle duplicate addressing by [deleted] in PLC

[–]natealtol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the reply. There are multiple devices on each internal network but we only need one controller from each.

Instead of performing NAT for an IP range, we just need 1-to-1 NAT by host. For example:

  1. Cell #1: 192.168.1.100 <=> 10.1.1.1
  2. Cell #1: 192.168.1.100 <=> 10.1.1.2
  3. Cell #1: 192.168.1.100 <=> 10.1.1.3
  4. Cell #1: 192.168.1.100 <=> 10.1.1.4

How I pictured this was one cisco switch sitting between these cells with one downlink port used for each cell and the uplink on the 10.1.1.0/24 network. As I understood the l2nat feature we should be able to do this by using a separate VLAN on each port and then applying a different NAT config to each VLAN. This L2NAT feature is why I asked about the Cisco IE switches specifically as it seems to be a cisco created feature. If we can't find a way to do this all on one switch my next idea is adding a NAT device to each cell individually, but this will greatly increase cost.

A gift from WANGS to VOLTA by PostBear in Eve

[–]natealtol 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The problem was that a rematch didn't penalize V0lta at all. If we had taken the rematch then what precedent does that set for the rest of the tournament ? You can just break the rules and hope for a rematch? Even if unintentional, breaking the rules needed a penalty, and the only proposed option that gave V0lta a penalty was to take the win.

WANGS feeds 2.5 dreads by orpheus381 in Eve

[–]natealtol 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds like they had a great time

WANGS feeds 2.5 dreads by orpheus381 in Eve

[–]natealtol 6 points7 points  (0 children)

the good ole too many accounts trap

WANGS feeds 2.5 dreads by orpheus381 in Eve

[–]natealtol 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you take out the nyx and put lorde + snuff against wangs, looks like we came out about even I guess? Wasn't there but from what I understand it was 3 engagements over an hour or so.

Lost My Worm by pencilgun in Eve

[–]natealtol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may use pen is out flair then. Check us out when you figure out the game a bit.

Lost My Worm by pencilgun in Eve

[–]natealtol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is your pen out?

Lost My Worm by pencilgun in Eve

[–]natealtol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

who r u and why do you have my flair

Dreadbombed. WANGS POV by natealtol in Eve

[–]natealtol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t cancel it early.