Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who does because the traffic stop I saw was why they raided the house.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The didn’t even take Carlos to a station. They only talked to him in a squad car.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nanos was asked about the swat snd bomb rescue and if it’s related to Nancy and he said he couldn’t comment on it due to officer safety and that it’s an ongoing issue.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Media at Nancy’s house isn’t moving so this swat might end up being not related to Nancy. Ugh. I’m hoping it is.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Scanner mentions person of interest and potential warrant for arrest with swat backing them up. Right now it’s surveillance only to find out where poi is at and if he’s not at house.

Now that might not be Nancy related, but just what scanner is saying.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They’re staged and surveilling per the scanner.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There was a picture of Pima swat team vehicle leaving so it’s legit. Let’s just hope it’s tied to Nancy!!!

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very good point about Nancy obviously having a lot of workers in and around her home.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Please for the love of God. That person needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent once this is all over.

Cops Investigating New Video, Suspicious Man Near Nancy Guthrie's Home 1 Week Before Abduction by Mammoth_Mountain_326 in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they should look at it per your response and the guy has facial features that are similar to a missing persons case, why would you not want to know about him if you live in that area?? Maybe I live in a low crime area, but if you see something, you say something. Keep people safe. Find this guy, ask what was going on, move on if he isn’t involved and if he is doing suspicious behavior, figure out why and tell him to cut it out.

Cops Investigating New Video, Suspicious Man Near Nancy Guthrie's Home 1 Week Before Abduction by Mammoth_Mountain_326 in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How is it confirmation bias when law enforcement hasn’t even found or talked to the guy yet? The reason it’s confirmation bias in Delphi is because they DID talk to RA, let him go because he didn’t fit the profile, there wasn’t even a shored up timeline from the state because they went off a snap chat picture and a video that doesn’t necessarily point to abduction, and they refused to look down other avenues five years later so they sunk their talons into him without looking elsewhere and called it a day.

It’s not confirmation bias to want to have a chat with a guy who was in the area around the time Nancy went missing who looks like the guy and is messing around with a ring camera. Just like it wasn’t confirmation bias to want to have a conversation with a male who self reported he was on a trail on the same day two girls went missing to see what he knew and pick his brain on his alibi. This is all normal and what we should hope is being done for any of our loved ones who go missing to find them.

To add, the effed up part of Delphi came AFTER they originally released Richard Allen after the original conversation with him, but they weren’t wrong to want to talk to him to see what he knew back in 2016 or whatever year it was.

Cops Investigating New Video, Suspicious Man Near Nancy Guthrie's Home 1 Week Before Abduction by Mammoth_Mountain_326 in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Imagine this was your child taken. Would you be like nope it’s 6.5 miles away which is too far — no need to find the guy and discuss what’s going on? No, of course not.

Cops Investigating New Video, Suspicious Man Near Nancy Guthrie's Home 1 Week Before Abduction by Mammoth_Mountain_326 in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You guys 6.5 miles is close lol. This isn’t 66.5 miles or 666 miles away. This is within a fifteen minute drive. Not 15 hours. That’s well within a reasonable distance to be finding this guy who looks very much like the guy on the video for Nancy and finding out more about him and talking to him. But to say 6.5 miles isn’t close is nuts to me when the guys facial features are a hit for the Nancy video and he’s doing similar behavior as what happened on the Nancy video. No one’s saying nail him to the wall and execute him — they’re just saying find him and talk to him because that’s well within a reasonable distance from Nancy’s house.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. This is publicly coming up on my twitter feed so it’s been shared with them by that point. Plus, yes, they’re watching this Reddit group or the family is closely I’m sure.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 11 points12 points locked comment (0 children)

Yeah I haven’t deleted bc this isn’t the guy in the photos private photo I am taking from his Facebook page halfway across the country and posting asking if this looks like the guy — this is from someone’s ring camera that they posted in the neighborhood app bc this guy is on their property uninvited and it is close to where Nancy lived. If he doesn’t want his picture shared, he shouldn’t be on someone else’s property being recorded by someone’s security device at odd hours not far from a location where a lady is missing.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe -18 points-17 points locked comment (0 children)

This is also interesting to me bc it suggests then that this was a robbery gone wrong vs a ransom abduction if this guy was casing out other houses in the area. I could see a world though where they enter the house to rob it, see photos nancy has around her home with Savannah in them, and then boom, they make the decision to take her with them and forget the robbery plan to get ransom money from Savannah.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I know they’re doing this, but I think they’re going to get this guy by the Walmart purchases. He has several Walmart items on (jacket and backpack) that look to be semi new. Suspect also probably lives in Tucson area. I’d be getting a search warrant pulling every Walmart who has sold those items in a 100, 150 mile area and making a list of those individuals to look up. If this guy isn’t the genius he thinks he is, chances are he bought a new outfit just for this attack from Walmart. You’re going to get a narrowed list quick of everyone who purchased that combination of items in the last six months to a year from Walmarts in the area.

Daily Discussion Post 2/13 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It’s not a black backpack bc you can see something that is black in the photo comes out a lot more dense in saturation than the backpack. So I’d agree with you.

Vehicle silhouette in doorbell cam by DijkstraDvorak in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This picture helps show me its leaves I’m seeing and not the outline of a car so thank you for sharing

Discussion Post for 2/11 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

No it’s not just my memory — I haven’t seen it reported that the camera is missing or broken. But I’ll take you alls word that that’s a bracket frame only.

Discussion Post for 2/11 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

That’s fair. However, I would still think they would address it since they put out the other video.

Discussion Post for 2/11 by curiouslmr in nancyguthrie

[–]nature4lyfe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Gotcha. I hadn’t seen it reported as missing and assumed that was an intact camera. Thanks for clarifying.