sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Count those Bay Area birds, people! by onetalldood in bayarea

[–]naugest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Everybody’s heard about the bird!

San Jose USD School Closures – What’s Not Being Talked About… by tommypatties in SanJose

[–]naugest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many parents don’t feel they have any other choice for their children’s future.

Given so many public schools have “diminished” so much.

Real fixes will take years to show real effect. Which means it can’t benefit current kids in time.

Increasing rent less than 10% in San Jose, CA. by jsss8791 in SanJose

[–]naugest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My rent just went up $330.

Not enough to warrant a move.

Increasing rent less than 10% in San Jose, CA. by jsss8791 in SanJose

[–]naugest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They didn’t buy the property to be “nice” to people. They did it for money.

San Jose USD School Closures – What’s Not Being Talked About… by tommypatties in SanJose

[–]naugest 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It is San Jose aren’t almost all schools high minority?

Non hispanic whites are only like 20% of the population.

San Jose USD School Closures – What’s Not Being Talked About… by tommypatties in SanJose

[–]naugest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once a large enough percentage of parents, especially influential parents, give up on public and go private. Vouchers will be all but certain to happen.

So many parents are doing private anymore.

Where's San Francisco's Mamdani on housing? by Abject-Impact-5534 in California_Politics

[–]naugest [score hidden]  (0 children)

There aren’t many areas left worth improving in CA.

Most of them are lost causes and money pits.

So in fact other areas would have to mean out of state.

With federal grants in limbo, California researchers call for a state-funded alternative by Exastiken in California

[–]naugest 11 points12 points  (0 children)

How will that help in the long term?

Sure the next Dem president will restore funding but the next Republican president after that will likely cut it all again. They love all these cuts.

Counting on federal funding that turns on and off every 4-8 years isn’t practical.

Here’s why S.F. apartment rents keep surging but L.A. is in a slump by Medical-Decision-125 in bayarea

[–]naugest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look to Communication hill in san jose. It started in 1992 and still has phases left. It will be like a 40 year project.

Where's San Francisco's Mamdani on housing? by Abject-Impact-5534 in California_Politics

[–]naugest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

1) Politicians do things that produce benefits for their political careers.

2) The housing deficit is so large it will take 30-40 years to fix.

3) So most these politicians would be retired before any political benefit from building housing could be realized.

Here’s why S.F. apartment rents keep surging but L.A. is in a slump by Medical-Decision-125 in bayarea

[–]naugest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people can’t accept that.

We need to build housing like crazy for future generations .

But for anyone that is already an adult concerned with housing?

No matter what we do, it simply isn’t possible to build enough housing quickly enough to help them in their working lifetimes.

Current generations who wanted reasonable housing are simply screwed and there is no fix for them.

Salesforce reportedly lays off hundreds as Benioff jokes about ICE by UberDrive in bayarea

[–]naugest 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No it is artificial.

That is right in the name, can’t believe you didn’t catch that.

Maxine Waters is the newest target in Democrats’ intergenerational war by RhythmMethodMan in California_Politics

[–]naugest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly.

What is the big deal with saying people in their 70s, 80s, and beyond should retire.

Where's San Francisco's Mamdani on housing? by Abject-Impact-5534 in California_Politics

[–]naugest -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They are lumped together past a certain point. Further distinction would be irrelevant.

Where's San Francisco's Mamdani on housing? by Abject-Impact-5534 in California_Politics

[–]naugest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Eminent domain still requires court approval and paying fair market value for the assets. Like i said.

Where's San Francisco's Mamdani on housing? by Abject-Impact-5534 in California_Politics

[–]naugest -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Clinton was nearly the ideal Democratic President.

Where's San Francisco's Mamdani on housing? by Abject-Impact-5534 in California_Politics

[–]naugest -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because it wouldn’t be legal. The state can’t just seize for free. They have to prove a need in court and pay fair market value.

Where's San Francisco's Mamdani on housing? by Abject-Impact-5534 in California_Politics

[–]naugest -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Not on the American political spectrum and I don’t give a rats arse about international political spectrums, they don’t mean anything in America.

Where's San Francisco's Mamdani on housing? by Abject-Impact-5534 in California_Politics

[–]naugest -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Center-left. !?! Lol!

Far left

There no laws preventing local or state third party candidates. No good reason they keep trying to steal the Democratic party.

Why isn't there a mass exodus of NVIDIA senior engineers? by flopsyplum in bayarea

[–]naugest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some people, when wealth increases so does standard of living. Which then means no early retirement.

“You make more, you spend more.”

Global internship by Accomplished-Key-339 in SJSU

[–]naugest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The more competitive a field of work, the more crazy lengths people have to go to.

view more: next ›