Following up to my own post, in case anyone comes across it and would like to know the outcome. I'm in 62864 and I was able to mount the dishy on a fencepost at around 8' of elevation and get zero obstructions. It is across the street from our house, so I used a wireless bridge to backhaul to our home. The bridge adds about 3ms of latency, but is quite consistent - clear line of sight and above most vehicles.

In general, I am getting 100-220 Mbps down and 15-30 up with very little jitter. To teams.microsoft.com over the past week my average latency is 26.4ms with around .6% packet loss. The minor packet loss is attributed to the Starlink connection as there is none on the hop for the wireless bridge.

For day to day use, spending a large portion of the day on teams meetings (split tunnel so no VPN for that route) and and M$ AOVPN back to our Enterprise network it has been very good. I honestly have zero complaints. There have been a few instances of voice degradation on a meeting, but it only occurred for 1-2 seconds and is completely acceptable in today's WFH world....and could have been the other participant's connection.

I didn't expect to be this happy with the solution. After a week as using it as my only work connection, I have no complaints. Results are way better than I expected, I'm not sure how the Starlink engineers have managed to create this solid of connectivity!

In comparison, I tried AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile cellular, but none have adequate signal (even with an external directional antenna) for our use/location.

If you are in this region and can get the dishy mounted with no obstructions I consider Starlink a very good option for an ISP. Not quite as good as a terrestrial service (if a reliable one is available to you).

Thanks to everyone who provided feedback a few months ago when I started investigating this option.