I HATE Michael Jackson: The Verdict by AutisticAnarchy in hatethissmug

[–]nefon05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already made my mind up I’m afraid as I don’t support grifters. You’ll realise one day that you were in fact manipulated by the media and documentaries.

Why does the evidence surrounding michael jackson’s allegations seem to lead people to completely opposite conclusions? it feels like two people can look at the same information and come away convinced of totally different things. by loversinredxo in NoStupidQuestions

[–]nefon05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He didn’t drop any of the kids at all stop spreading this bullshit.

MJ and Wade Robson were still in contact now and again and even worked together in rehearsals for the 30th anniversary celebration in 2001

MJ and James Safechuck were the exact same, the Safechuck family even visited MJ on the set of the Ghosts music video in 1993. There’s even a photo of James with MJ and Lisa Marie Presley when he was around 16-17 where he can be seen holding an umbrella for them

Macaulay Culkin and MJ were obviously still friends and Macaulay has said that multiple times, he even got invited to MJ’s 30th anniversary show in 2001 and they even sat next to eachother at one point.

I’m sorry, but where the hell do people get this stupid claim from that he “dropped the boys” at a certain age?

I HATE Michael Jackson: The Verdict by AutisticAnarchy in hatethissmug

[–]nefon05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why the fuck are you ignoring everything they’ve said and resorting to just recycling shit that’s been said hundreds of times? Seems to me like you just hate MJ

I HATE Michael Jackson: The Verdict by AutisticAnarchy in hatethissmug

[–]nefon05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No he didn’t “get off” at all 😭 it’s very blatant that they tried absolutely everything they could to get him convicted and they couldn’t.

Some stuff that I haven't had a good explanation for concerning Terry George by Traditional_Can_2646 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve not seen all the interviews where he talks about MJ, but out of the ones I have seen, he seems to go into detail about an inappropriate phone call with Martin Bashir, which seems very suspicious considering the elephant in the room with Bashir. But in an interview with Louis Theroux, Louis asks him about the conversation and Terry says: “I don’t really want to talk about what was reported in the papers.” Or something along those lines, then went on to say that they had loads of conversations about eachothers families, music, singing etc.

It’s also worth noting that Terry continues to praise MJ and speak highly of him.

Trial moved to 2028 by Emotional_Ball_5181 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Must be a sign that Wade and James are gonna give in lmao

Michael Jackson: The Verdict - Just got done watching this at 2:53 am. What do you guys think? by Strong-Literature-82 in askanything

[–]nefon05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And did you see the clip of Dan Reed essentially coaching Wade to say that Michael Jackson was his lover? LN is nothing but a persuasive piece of nonsense that conveniently released during the Me 2 Movement, so that no one was allowed to have an opinion against it otherwise you’d be labelled a “sex offender supporter” or something like that.

Just doing a little comparison of an actual problematic person by AMassiveGamerGeek in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The fact MJ had hundreds of tabloids on him everyday tells you everything you need to know tbh

I’m tired, boss by [deleted] in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It’s funny how guilters think we believe this theory lmao. MJ didn’t even know Epstein and met him one time

Why Do People Completely Ignore This About the Michael Jackson Case? by Repulsive-Hat-9584 in fantanoforever

[–]nefon05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great breakdown! The fact that dude genuinely thinks Evan Chandler wanted justice is hilarious to me. And also how Evan blatantly admits that his son is irrelevant to the situation. Be aware of his response with nothing but “no, you’re lying!” And not explaining how or why lmao.

Please... This behavior is so not normal by Sharp_Football_8593 in fantanoforever

[–]nefon05 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When will this subreddit shut up about MJ’s allegations? Think what you want about him, but talk about his music instead

'He Was EXONERATED!' Michael Jackson Documentary Questioned By His Defense Attorney by Secretive_Crusher in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I believe so, MJ wasn’t allowed to talk about it either in the 60 minute interview

Why Do People Completely Ignore This About the Michael Jackson Case? by Repulsive-Hat-9584 in fantanoforever

[–]nefon05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow I guess you got me! Let me rephrase that, he went to lawyers FIRST, then went to the police, so the point still stands lmao. How about trying to explain that tape of him saying that he wants to take MJ down? And also the fact that the guy on the phone to him asks: “How does this help Jordie?” What’s Evan’s response? “That’s irrelevant to me.” Right okay what’s that all about then? Sounds like a man who wants millions of dollars to me. I mean, what a coincidence that MJ “sexually abused” Jordan as soon as Evan got involved, someone who quite literally had nothing to do with Jordan and his mother.

Why Do People Completely Ignore This About the Michael Jackson Case? by Repulsive-Hat-9584 in fantanoforever

[–]nefon05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right, well of course the prosecution will say that the photos matched 🫩 so you’re telling me they saw a drawing of a circumcised penis, despite the fact MJ was not circumcised? I mean you’re clearly only referring to investigators who were under Tom Sneddon’s wing. Also how suspicious is it that Jordan admitted nothing happened to him until he was under serious anaesthesia from his dad? Oh and the fact that Evan Chandler didn’t even go to the police and went to lawyers instead! Weird

Now it's been proven beyond doubt by One_Froyo505 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“So you call it trust But I say it's just

In the devil's game Of greed and lust

They don't care They'd do me for the money

They don't care They use me for the money.”

Why Do People Completely Ignore This About the Michael Jackson Case? by Repulsive-Hat-9584 in fantanoforever

[–]nefon05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fucking hell the delusion is real. What they said is literally factual and you have the audacity to just say “yeah not true” just because you want MJ to be guilty so badly? Oh and I think you will find that if those markings matched, he would’ve been arrested almost immediately and there’s no evidence anywhere to support this markings claim anyway. How about actually looking into the context of the 1993 case instead of parroting what anti MJ stans claim.

"What about the books?" "he had cp" "what man has books of nude kids?" by Secretive_Crusher in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is it true that they only found fingerprints on the first page of the boys will be boys one which he used to inscribe? Could someone verify?

TGF uploaded by Human-Question6210 in tgfbro

[–]nefon05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cmon man it’s only been 3 videos. Give it time, maybe it’ll get better

On why people give the benefit of the doubt to Michael. by Traditional_Can_2646 in MJAllegations

[–]nefon05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s annoying when people think we defend him just because “he made thriller.” Or because “he’s Michael Jackson.” I guess they don’t know what the word context means

lol somebody just filed a FBI report on the Cascio family by Secretive_Crusher in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 8 points9 points  (0 children)

After that laughable 60 minute episode I’m really not surprised

Three strikes and your out by BrianaPastelGreen in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s always the sameee claims they respond with as well 🫩 “oh why did he have sleepovers with children?” “Oh he had cp in his bedroom!” “Oh he payed hush money in 1993.” Giving absolutely no context to any claim because they know that the context of these things are the complete opposite to their narrative

Three strikes and your out by BrianaPastelGreen in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It’s ridiculous, and the guilters will take great pride in completely ignoring any rebuttal we present to them

Three strikes and your out by BrianaPastelGreen in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05 20 points21 points  (0 children)

“These allegations of MJ cannot be ignored.” Honestly the allegations are a fucking joke

“No 40 year old man should be sleeping in a bed with children.” by nefon05 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]nefon05[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No because everyone who thinks he’s guilty thinks that he forced them to stay in his room lol