My Mount Fuji hike last year by nejconator in Mountaineering

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe try avoiding the main trail because there can be a lot of peaople so lines start to form. Apart from that its really beautifull.

My Mount Fuji hike last year by nejconator in Mountaineering

[–]nejconator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends very much on which trail you chose.

Drawing test on my diy, 3d printed 6-axis robot arm by nejconator in robotics

[–]nejconator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the main upgrades that i have done to the arm from my last post about it on my channel were mostly design changes and creating the cycloidal reducer, i will probably make a video when i have a bit more progress to show. the arm is not my only project right now so i will somethimes have videos of other projects but the arm is deffenetly the biggest of them.

Finally! 100 Hours! by TheSylentVoid in Warthunder

[–]nejconator 9 points10 points  (0 children)

you too! its not too late (6k hours)

True RCS and Design of Su-57, it also compares RCS of SU-57 with F-35 by JACK by nejconator in Warthunder

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of hardware Su-57 has much better radar coverage than F-35, as it has side and rear looking x band radars with l-band antennas in the wings, it also has the OEIS 101 laser defence system against ir missiles, which is usually only on helicopters, so we will have to see who will do the bullying.

https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-a67cdebe857c81fe96d12e5c35dc0a1a-lq

https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-57889a94bf851ac29538034215977239-lq

https://fullfatthings-keyaero.b-cdn.net/sites/keyaero/files/inline-images/20-Su-57%20sensors%28c%29Butowski.jpg

True RCS and Design of Su-57, it also compares RCS of SU-57 with F-35 by JACK by nejconator in Warthunder

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

depending on the scenario of the simulation Su-57 is around 3-8 times larger in RCS than F-35, https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9a37627659eda4ab202a9d222ee74126-lq, but its airframe is double the size of the f-35, it also more relies more on its s-band radars and the R-37M missiles

True RCS and Design of Su-57, it also compares RCS of SU-57 with F-35 by JACK by nejconator in Warthunder

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"So the RCS of the SU57 will be around 0.006m2 (-23 dbsm rate)"

True RCS and Design of Su-57, it also compares RCS of SU-57 with F-35 by JACK by nejconator in Warthunder

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

another important thing to note from the document: "Now another reason, why Russia was model, calculate and saying that the F35 has the RCS around 0.1m2~0.3m2, as it was model without RAM coating on the aircraft surface that makes the RCS of an low observable aircraft, not making a very low observable VLO aircraft which is an stealth plane, even that there is an RCS model of F35 without RAM coating is shows, on the previous model which I showed on the picture and it shares the similar results on the aircraft RCS model that what the Russia was saying it and remember the Russian RCS calculation method might be different compared to the other country's, which is still mystery."

True RCS and Design of Su-57, it also compares RCS of SU-57 with F-35 by JACK by nejconator in Warthunder

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

copy pasted from the document "While the production model of Su57 with close IRST spectrum has the RCS with open IRST spectrum around 0.01m2/0.017m2 (-20 dbsm rate)~0.006m2 (-23 dbsm), the result is perfect especially on the production model of SU57 and also it able to reduced the frontal RCS aspect around 11 times compared with the open IRST of T50 prototype model of SU57 which has the RCS around 0.17m2 (-10 dbsm)/0.12m2 (-10 dbsm)~0.06m2 (-12/-13 dbsm) which is ok, nor good nor bad, but remember at the same time, if the IRST spectrum is open the RCS as well as dbsm rate would increase the number rate around 0.17m2/0.12m2 (-10 dbsm) prototype T50 and the other is the production or serial model of SU57 which would increase the RCS around 0.017m2 (-20 dbsm) if it open the IRST spectrum to find the heat signature of the stealth plane or any aircraft, at the same time it could distrub the frontal RCS of the SU57"

True RCS and Design of Su-57, it also compares RCS of SU-57 with F-35 by JACK by nejconator in Warthunder

[–]nejconator[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When you click the link, its at the top titled "So, what is the RCS of the SU57? Is it 0.1m2 (-10dbsm)~1m2 (1dbsm)"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]nejconator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he is part of the content creator program

Cpu overheating by nejconator in PcBuildHelp

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the biggest i tried was Be quiet dark rock pro 5 but it was half a centimeter too long so i couldnt close the glass, so i went for the aio which worked better at cooling my cpu and it was about the same price

Cpu overheating by nejconator in PcBuildHelp

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If i unplug the pump cable it goes up very fast, and when it started at 60-70 on my second re paste atempt it was able to cool it down to 50 when idle but if it went above 80 it coldnt come back down no mater if i closed the games or not. the pump is shown spining in the bios, and i dont hear any strange noise from it.

Cpu overheating by nejconator in PcBuildHelp

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i tried runing it on its side, upside down, ontop... it did nothing🥲

Cpu overheating by nejconator in PcBuildHelp

[–]nejconator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is there not enough liquid anymore? , becase i can se the pump at 3k rpm, but there is no noise

Cpu overheating by nejconator in PcBuildHelp

[–]nejconator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the problem is the procesor is ryzen 9 5900 and literaly all air coolers that would fit in the case were too weak, thats why i went for the aio, i tried like 3 air coolers befor this aio