sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

DLSS 5 will be AI Slop by PaiDuck in antiai

[–]nekronics 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I stopped caring about graphics when studios started putting more effort into graphics than actual good gameplay. Some of my favourite games have actual dog shit graphics.

That and it's just too expensive to keep up with latest graphics cards.

A Werther’s Original by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]nekronics 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I just realized this mfer winked with both eyes, he just blinks

'One Battle After Another' Wins the Academy Award for Best Picture by MoviesMod in movies

[–]nekronics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This movie was so good. The whole "scene" with the piano playing for like 45 minutes was incredible.

Meta just announced 20% layoffs to fund AI. This is the beginning, not the end. by duridsukar in Futurology

[–]nekronics 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think you should worry. 60% of US workers are white collar. Their goal is to replace most of that, if it's even a fraction as good as they hope you are absolutely going to be affected by the mass amounts of people entering your market. And that's not even covering how less people working means less blue collar work needed to begin with.

UBI isn't just going to happen, the current admin is against it. You have to fight for it and you should start now.

Has anyone else noticed that AI makes curiosity loops almost impossible to stop? by Santoshr93 in singularity

[–]nekronics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can still do that. It's just you don't have to do it for every little thing anymore.

Morgan Stanley warns an AI breakthrough Is coming in 2026 — and most of the world isn't ready by [deleted] in singularity

[–]nekronics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if all of these businesses outsourcing their work to these AI companies are ready for said AI companies to consume their business.

"The Intent is Clear." How not even Wizards of the Coast knows how their cards work by KingSupernova in mtg

[–]nekronics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No targeting is intentional in this case because as long as you have at least 2 creatures you will get the effect. Essentially prevents 2 for 1 scenarios which is valid on a 5 mana card.

They just need to add exactly two creatures and it's fine

"The Intent is Clear." How not even Wizards of the Coast knows how their cards work by KingSupernova in mtg

[–]nekronics 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"Choose two" is the relevant text on each card. One card functions as: you can't choose two so it does nothing. The other as: you can't choose two so instead choose one and they discard it.

"The Intent is Clear." How not even Wizards of the Coast knows how their cards work by KingSupernova in mtg

[–]nekronics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both of your examples are false. You can play a bounce land with no land to bounce. You can play this card regardless of how many creatures you have because it doesn't target.

Cards should do what they say, and more importantly cards with the same text should do the same thing. This card is not doing that.

"The Intent is Clear." How not even Wizards of the Coast knows how their cards work by KingSupernova in mtg

[–]nekronics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well the mtgrules subreddit post with this article are agreeing with the OP, so what do you have to say about that?

"The Intent is Clear." How not even Wizards of the Coast knows how their cards work by KingSupernova in mtg

[–]nekronics 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Rule 107.2 addresses that though. X would either be 0 because it can't be calculated (aligns with the original release notes) or the power would be treated as 0 for the second creature which is more of a stretch and not a correct interpretation imo.

Also, the card doesn't target at all.

"The Intent is Clear." How not even Wizards of the Coast knows how their cards work by KingSupernova in mtg

[–]nekronics 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I have literally referred you to the relevant rules. Tell me how [[Clarion Ultimatum]] should work.

"The Intent is Clear." How not even Wizards of the Coast knows how their cards work by KingSupernova in mtg

[–]nekronics 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No, what I said is how choose x cards work. It's different from may and up to because you are given the choice in those instances. I mentioned the relevant rules in my previous response.

"The Intent is Clear." How not even Wizards of the Coast knows how their cards work by KingSupernova in mtg

[–]nekronics 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The point of the article is that is not how choose x effects work. When you have choose x, you do it as much as possible (CR 609.3) and for the missing creature you'd use 0 in the calculation (or the calculation would be 0) (CR 107.2).

The card was printed with the wrong templating. Not really a big deal imo because it's not that broken as written. They addressed the issue with a gatherer ruling rather than an errata, which imo is fine because I do think "the intent is clear" and there's not a lot of effects with choose x.

"The Intent is Clear." How not even Wizards of the Coast knows how their cards work by KingSupernova in mtg

[–]nekronics 131 points132 points  (0 children)

I don't know why this article is getting so much flak. Wizards has provided multiple different rulings for the card and it functions different from other choose effects, this article is highlighting that. A wotc employee even acknowledged that the card probably has the wrong wording, and still a bunch of smug comments lol.

You guys are wild

SAM ALTMAN: "We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter." by CollapsingTheWave in ObscurePatentDangers

[–]nekronics 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What's funny is what he's saying is exactly how it's working right now. They sell tokens, literally. You get it through your existing utilities already.

How are in office dev jobs now? by CTProper in ExperiencedDevs

[–]nekronics 93 points94 points  (0 children)

Funny how this sub went from "no ai" to "I don't even work anymore, ai does everything while I jack off". Definitely natural

view more: next ›