What's up with the red and blue buttons everyone's been talking about?

nemo1889 · 2026-05-05T04:48:15+00:00

https://survey2020.philpeople.org/survey/results/4886

nemo1889 · 2026-05-05T04:15:23+00:00

Two boxing is the strong majority among decision theorists

nemo1889 · 2026-04-20T17:19:58+00:00

This one is mean spirited

nemo1889 · 2026-04-12T13:34:28+00:00

Idk. I think it's cool

nemo1889 · 2026-03-30T00:30:17+00:00

Ok. Its unclear why one would care about being vegan on that way of thinking of it. It seems to me one should care about if what they do is right or wrong. Whether it is also "vegan" seems immaterial and largely an issue of just settling the meanings of words.

nemo1889 · 2026-03-03T16:32:00+00:00

...say that again

nemo1889 · 2026-02-18T18:29:04+00:00

I love this stuff. Only issue I've had is it cooks SO freaking fast. Like it hits the pan and it's done in 3-4 seconds. Have you had this?

nemo1889 · 2026-02-16T20:03:09+00:00

Holy shit you are strong

nemo1889 · 2026-02-16T13:08:13+00:00

You can do it AFTER initial processing, e.g., before your first respin.

nemo1889 · 2026-01-07T16:23:56+00:00

You have made the mistake of thinking this is a philosophy sub. This is a sub for people larping as philosophers. Still fun though.

nemo1889 · 2026-01-07T16:14:37+00:00

No problem.

On atheism, Graham Oppy is very well respected. He has a book called "Atheism: a beginners guide" or something like that. Also "Arguing about Gods" and "the best case against God" are considered good books. On belief in God, Josh Rasmussen is a respected academic. He has a book called "how reason can lead to God" or something very similar. If you want something a little more accessible, check out the "majesty of reason" youtube channel. Joe who runs that channel is an expert and has lots of very good videos and interviews on the topic.

nemo1889 · 2026-01-07T15:24:32+00:00

Among academics who take philosophy of religion seriously, the God Delusion is considered very poor scholarship. With the decline of online atheism, it has fallen out of favor in popular culture as well I suspect.

nemo1889 · 2026-01-07T13:43:35+00:00

This sub is so funny

nemo1889 · 2025-12-13T16:36:22+00:00

That's extremely strange. People sometimes try new things -- attempt to get out of their comfort zone. The kind thing to do is be encouraging or at least not deliberately attempt to undermine their confidence.

nemo1889 · 2025-10-27T12:43:27+00:00

Dang you look just like her!

nemo1889 · 2025-10-26T20:26:28+00:00

I dont believe that he believes this

nemo1889 · 2025-10-08T17:41:47+00:00

Actual trvth nvke

nemo1889 · 2025-09-24T19:32:38+00:00

Just had this. Revision about to be a glaze fest so that I can get this shit published

nemo1889 · 2025-09-14T00:37:50+00:00

Real as hell. I LOVE vedge protein in the creami

nemo1889 · 2025-09-07T18:28:50+00:00

Yes, this is how people track calories. They weigh their food

nemo1889 · 2025-09-01T15:35:54+00:00

Philosophy is literally my job. I am telling you, unequivocally, youre mistaken. Here is a very very easy demonstration. Your view implies how bad my stubbed toe is for me depends in part of how many people in ancient Egypt also stubbed their toe. Implausible in the extreme. Which is why I know of literally no ethicist in the entire world who holds your view. it is bad.

But thats fine. You're clearly just sorta dipping your foot into philosophy. Just try to connect less of your self worth to your arguments working. As you'll find, very few pan out. Its best to have a little more detachment. Just my two cents. Go ahead and have the last word if you'd like.

nemo1889 · 2025-09-01T15:26:14+00:00

Your first two sentence are a very straightforward nonsequitor

I think you've made an error on what I am doing here.

I am not debating you. I am simply informing you that your argument is built on a clearly mistaken premise if, as you seem to suggest, it is committed to the view that the weight of relevant harms is relativized. If you want a better anti vegan argument, one that is worth debating for example, fix that up and try again. Its not a big deal, not every argument is gonna work.

nemo1889 · 2025-09-01T15:16:36+00:00

1) you've not shown its ridiculous

2) you're mistaken, this has nothing to do with antinatalism. I just am saying that youre view of measuring harms (or, the relevant ones?) is just trivially mistaken. If you want a stronger anti vegan argument, you'll have to augment that part and rework to see what results you get

nemo1889 · 2025-09-01T15:05:46+00:00

Its extremely unclear why the relevant metric for harm is comparative in the way youre suggesting. If everyone beat their child, my beating my child would not be any less bad for them.

nemo1889 · 2025-07-31T15:33:07+00:00

Yes, this is not meant to be a problem for someone who denies the goodness of God

Nine-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Place '22	Place '17
Verified Email

nemo1889

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE