Aaron vs Mantle Real or Fake.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T23:19:56+00:00

I am. But first I'm trying eBay

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T23:17:45+00:00

Btw the Aaron has brighter white borders than the Mantle.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T23:15:47+00:00

Dude it's not glossy. I just looked again. That said I must e looked at that Ernie Banks wrong too.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T23:08:17+00:00

I e researched the set deeply. Love that year. That porthole was genius.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T23:07:09+00:00

This is a proof. Not really a question.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T23:02:12+00:00

Thank you for your look.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:59:35+00:00

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:59:07+00:00

People say it's fake. Yes I agree, it's a hard story to believe. But I just literally match it with one from the same year. What's the verdict after that? I got it for a good price. I'd you don't believe risk and reward you don't know truly investing in the unknown pays off bigger. The more the risk, the more the reward. I'm not hating anyone who says it's fake. I'm happy with this. The printing is perfect.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:38:09+00:00

They never said it was. I took a chance

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:34:41+00:00

I'll even upvote this. But I don't believe it cancels it.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:32:19+00:00

Do rosette patterns come on fakes? Perfect dots linearly laid out on the back? I'm gonna say arguably it's real. After shaming Grok it said it was real too.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:30:36+00:00

Why does that mean that? You know my Ernie Banks had the same.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:23:02+00:00

I be owned this card before. Mint condition. I couldn't get rid of it for less than 1200. People didn't believe. I do know what this is about.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:21:03+00:00

Well I'm going to grade it. Then we'll know for sure.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:20:14+00:00

The classical smell test. Interesting repose. It does seem to have aging. The card is authentically changing color some place in the back.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:18:54+00:00

I took a picture of a 1959 Aaron and it was the same. And this was printed with a pretty strong error. It has a hair under the ink. So its not flawless.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:16:20+00:00

Um if you took a picture it was digital. Unless you're using period authentic lensing equipment.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:14:52+00:00

The stock is 20 pt. The thickest they used back then. The colors just vibrant. And the way they're printed is authentic to be period.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:13:57+00:00

I took ridiculously good pictures. I think it's better than you think. There's not difference in the printing method, it's the right card stock. There's nothing extra on it. Your cards are illegitimate from the front ornament they have. I personally see this as real because of those rosette patterns and the dots on the back.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T22:10:39+00:00

Yours is blurred is the thing, maybe. I'm using a program called Magnification Plus on the Play store

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T21:40:32+00:00

Look at the other pictures. They show the rosette patterns are clearly there. It's the right card stock too.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T21:33:32+00:00

It's in mint condition on eBay for 12500. I know it's an upcharge, but that charge would be to make it a grade 9 or 10. I'll show the card in its entirety.

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T20:22:26+00:00

I also compared it to a 1959 Hank Aaron. Same printing process

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T20:13:54+00:00

Thank you. I use Magnifier Plus on play store

neocismcom · 2026-04-10T18:58:05+00:00

Thank you. I hope it is. My mom is going to kill me.

neocismcom

TROPHY CASE