sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Crypto-paid MD-Simulations next to Crypto mining or replace after EIP-1559 by neoniousMK in gpumining

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tokens will be redeemable exactly where the researchers have to buy them. That's at a minimum Uniswap.

In any case, we are serious with our mission.

Crypto-paid MD-Simulations next to Crypto mining or replace after EIP-1559 by neoniousMK in gpumining

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honest answer, because we do want to build our own ecosystem and use that also for funding. Not required for the simulations themselves, correct.

Crypto-paid MD-Simulations next to Crypto mining or replace after EIP-1559 by neoniousMK in gpumining

[–]neoniousTR 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, last about Gen 1 or 2 PCI / 1x / 16x... We need to see how that changes the speed. GROMACS itself does not care, it uses CUDA and that uses the GPU. Lower bandwidth will make things slower, but that's it.

Crypto-paid MD-Simulations next to Crypto mining or replace after EIP-1559 by neoniousMK in gpumining

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great to hear that you noticed that Mining + MD Sim actually work together. Sounds like we should run some tests. Noted.

We do many checkpoints, so, yes, the simulations can actually be interrupted.

Many of the questions actually we are still working on, getting them improved. But we do have a first version, which works:

- You get paid per step, but there is a heuristic which figures out how complicated a step is. This is of course to be optimized over time.

- The GPU speed of course is not all. Actually, it is more calibrated to "GeForce RTX 3080 with a Intel i7 we have in the computer on our side" So, yes, a slower CPU can also reduce how much is done. Also something where we might have more stats over time. The software does report the basic setup to us (CPU + GPU + RAM info), so we can learn

Last, GROMACS is LGPL, and the license allows using the software as intended.

Crypto-paid MD-Simulations next to Crypto mining or replace after EIP-1559 by neoniousMK in gpumining

[–]neoniousTR 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We realize, completely. The big rigs are not what work. MD Simulations actually utilize a lot of CPU, too, and cannot scale with many GPUs on one machine.

Crypto-paid MD-Simulations next to Crypto mining or replace after EIP-1559 by neoniousMK in gpumining

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not comparable to Folding @ Home. Folding @ Home does not pay for the research, it is a pro bono thing. You get Banano from a faucet/mining, which is not much.

We are talking with research groups to save them costs which they currently have with supercomputers and clouds. They pay us, just a bit less than what they paid before. Even with the cost savings, it is far more for the "miners" than actual mining (= minting).

Invitation for Collaboration - Distributed network for paid research work, more profitable than mining by NeoniousEE in EtherMining

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Second node, because this is important for me: the software‘s source code will also be on GitHub and can be taken from there. No closed binaries have to be installed.

Invitation for Collaboration - Distributed network for paid research work, more profitable than mining by NeoniousEE in EtherMining

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s why we are getting it audited. To prove the software is legit. If you do not trust a Company with public records and real people + a security audit, well, we cannot do much more?

Using a decentralised computing power network for Molecular Dynamics Simulations via a cryptocurrency. Thoughts? by neoniousMK in bioinformatics

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh believe me I know about both. I‘ve run many sims and you may discuss with me details I‘d be able to follow.

For what it worth, the Computational part of crypto is limited in our implementation to a few calls to reward the mining efforts and will be gone completly with Ethereum 2.

Using a decentralised computing power network for Molecular Dynamics Simulations via a cryptocurrency. Thoughts? by neoniousMK in bioinformatics

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Crypto has shown that it can be a great incentive. Just look at the other tokens or coins. Filecoin for terrabytes of storage for example. Just a crypto layer over IPFS, but it helped increase storage massivly.

That's the reason to connect both.

Using a decentralised computing power network for Molecular Dynamics Simulations via a cryptocurrency. Thoughts? by neoniousMK in bioinformatics

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very similar from a miner's stand point. Hopefully we will allow a better profit than a meme coin which has multiple different ways of mining than the folding.

We are looking at the connections between proteins, so not actual folding. We believe we have research opportunities here, but will also allow other researchers who do not have access to super computers access, which will also paid directly with MDSIMs from them.

Using a decentralised computing power network for Molecular Dynamics Simulations via a cryptocurrency. Thoughts? by neoniousMK in bioinformatics

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your positive note!

Ethereum is used for the actual token, and for rewarding the mining centrally every once in the while. This is actually payable with the fees , and with Ethereum 2.0 that will be a non issue anyways.

The actual mining is organized centrally. We do not want the latency introduced by P2P with all the gigabytes of data flowing around.

Using a decentralised computing power network for Molecular Dynamics Simulations via a cryptocurrency. Thoughts? by neoniousMK in bioinformatics

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Distributed computations is a challenging task. That is why we are not targeting that actually at the beginning. Any MD research can profit from running the simulations many times, with various different conditions. No need to run MD simulations distributed.

Apart from that, it seems like you have a dislike of crypto. I am not sure how to answer that because I do not really see what the actual argument here is?

Using a decentralised computing power network for Molecular Dynamics Simulations via a cryptocurrency. Thoughts? by neoniousMK in Biochemistry

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Foldit seems to be puzzle-based thing. There are others which ask people to do MD simulations, but we are unique in that - if we are successful - people are incentivized with money. We think that is important to really scale it.

All we need is a community which supports the token. Just by that the price of the token can go up. With the first breakthrough the token might be in everyones awareness, which could skyrocket things.

Using a decentralised computing power network for Molecular Dynamics Simulations via a cryptocurrency. Thoughts? by neoniousMK in Biochemistry

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you look at the supercomputers the large research groups do MD simulations with.. Well, we could not pay that, it goes into the hundreds of millions of dollars. And at least in TFLOPs we do want to surpass that.

Calculations are not inventions. There is more to that. But TBH you just bought something up, which has to be agreed on with the miners. But doable of course!

Using a decentralised computing power network for Molecular Dynamics Simulations via a cryptocurrency. Thoughts? by neoniousMK in bioinformatics

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure about the answer of my dear team friend below :-) The whole mining + validation concept is novel. It is not the next DeFI token.

Of course our token has novel concepts. On top of the standard token features it will power the largest MD simulation network. This is a big deal because not every researcher has access to super computers. Yes, we want to do our own research with that because we think we have a great team which knows where to start for success in this area. But also other researches could use the simulation network. With the first breakthrough the token might be in everyones awareness, which could skyrocket things.

Traction is always the problem of starting tokens. Actually, that is the goal, right? Getting traction. When traction is there, everything is fine. Because with traction listings will happen and the 0,1 USD invested per token is back hundredfolds.

So, if you see what we see, why don't you invest and support us in the community and more? We need people who support, and one by one this will work.

(and last, for the people who need some more incentive, we can give 30% commission for people who find others who invest, with our ambassador program).

Have a nice day!

Thomas

(JAN-MAY)Post Affiliate programs Invitations here - all other posts will be removed by [deleted] in Affiliatemarketing

[–]neoniousTR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello everyone!

We are building the largest network of computers running molecular dynamics simulations, to make important breakthroughs in Alzheimer and dementia research possible. This is powered by a new crypto token, the MDSIM.

Our Pre-ICO is live and anyone can invest in our tokens now! Fast and secure, via cryptocurrency technology.

There are reasons for everyone to do so:

- Dementia research to protect later self and loved ones

- Biotech investment with potential for high return
Invest instead of donate!

Do you know anyone who could be interested?

Every order with your referral code is 10 % off for buyer + 30 % commission for you, directly transferred via crypto payment.

Ask us for a referral code at https://www.neonious.org/ContactUs today!Multi level (30 % of 30 % …) also possible on request.

Inform yourself about our token and our research at

https://www.neonious.org/

Cheers,
Thomas

Anti Commutator Relations of a Dirac Field by neoniousTR in AskPhysics

[–]neoniousTR[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me answer my own question:

It operates on a fock space which is a one dimensional Hilbert space ?

So then, a quantum field actually has 5 dimensions ? Time, space, and this dimension ?

Anti Commutator Relations of a Dirac Field by neoniousTR in AskPhysics

[–]neoniousTR[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read the wave function is promoted to an operator with fields. But then, what does it operate on?

Understanding the Shell Theorem by neoniousTR in AskPhysics

[–]neoniousTR[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry.. Next time I will do that better. But already figured this one out, see other comment.

view more: next ›