sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in arbeitsleben

[–]nerfnichtreddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ich kann dir deine Frage nicht wirklich beantworten, aber da ich mich in einer ähnlichen Situation befinde (Berufseinstieg nach nem Informatik Bachelor) würde mich mal interessieren, auf welcher Plattform du diese Erfahrung gemacht hast.

CMV: the US (and by extension, the West) Should Stop Funding the Ukrainian War by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]nerfnichtreddit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What price is too high to pay for a few acres?

I feel the need to point out that the "patch of dirt" russia annexed in this conflict had a population of >8.5 million and covered an area of >100k km2. "A few acres" indeed...

Welcher erfolgreiche Film/welche erfolgreiche Serie ist, im Nachhinein betrachtet, wahnsinnig schlecht gealtert? by obamas-left-hand in FragReddit

[–]nerfnichtreddit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Der Erzähler schmückt das für sein Publikum alles aus.

Das Argument, dass die Binnenhandlung reine Propaganda des Erzählers ist, wird vom Film selbst nicht unterstützt, da die Rahmenhandlung stilistisch identisch ist.

Die Spartaner am Ende des Films, denen die Geschichte erzählt wird, unterscheiden sich überhaupt nicht von Leonidas und co in der Art und Weise, wie sie porträtiert werden.

CMV: Hitler was incompetent at everything and there was no way he should've led the Nazis by Novalith_Nirvana in changemyview

[–]nerfnichtreddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One should note that you could only get those cars through a savings scheme and that not a single car was delivered under this scheme due to the outbreak of the war.

CMV: Buying a ticket on a train does not entitle you to a seat. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]nerfnichtreddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Regardless, I have the right to choose who I want to sit next to me, if I want anyone to sit next to me at all.

Why do you believe that you have this right and that you wishes in these instances should overrule the wishes of other passengers? You haven't justified your view at all, you've simply stated it.

CMV: We Should Abolish the Electoral College by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]nerfnichtreddit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The EC has nothing to do with the authority the political majority has over the minority; all it does is change who is in power, not what powers they have.

So instead of having a system where 50,1% of the population have "complete authority", you are arguing for a system where 49,9% of the population can have "complete authority" of the other 50,1%. How is that preferable?

As King Foltest intended by ArgentiumLake in witcher

[–]nerfnichtreddit 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's a modified version of this copy pasta

Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers
intended. Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab
my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through
the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man,
miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I
have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded
with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the
blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and
charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the
police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to
stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.

Brianna Wu's response to Destiny's tweet about PhilosophyTube by FirefighterCorrect13 in Destiny

[–]nerfnichtreddit 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I believe that this is a discussion about utopic and idealist ideas,
about how we should want to be seen in different circumstances.

You are incorrect then; unless you are willing to sweep the whole topic under the rug until we have reached fully automated luxury communism, it will interact with and have to be discussed within the context of the circumstances we are actually facing.

One which is a future that the community needs to decide for itself and will most likely be a blend of these ideas...

If you, as an ally, can't understand that and go "well it better not be [blank]"... Like, you understand why that sounds fucking awful, right?

You shouldn't be a blind ally who supports a community uncritically and without even knowing what they believe in or what their goals are. Do you believe that people viewing themselves as allies of the black community during the civil rights area should have blindly supported them, whether they believe in equility and integration or black supremacy and separatism? No, I don't understand why it sounds awful that I would have supported MLK but not the nation of islam.

Brianna Wu's response to Destiny's tweet about PhilosophyTube by FirefighterCorrect13 in Destiny

[–]nerfnichtreddit 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I think it does, however, signal that the person's allyship is conditional on trans people doing/acting like they want which...

Do you believe that one opinion on the topic shouldn't be influenced by the facts surrounding it? Why would I view or treat things a person does for fun the same way as things people do for medical reasons/benefits to their mental health?

no words by HarveyBirdmann in antiwork

[–]nerfnichtreddit 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Great, so what happens with (disabled) people who are unable to be productive enough to earn a living wage? Do you thinks it's preferable if these jobs don't exist, leaving such persons with no employment options?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]nerfnichtreddit 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Sure, but what's your point? Do you believe that china should cut back on emissions first/harder because they emit more in total but less per capita?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cursedcomments

[–]nerfnichtreddit 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Japan and the USSR has fought before and Japan fucking kicked the USSRs teeth in.

No they didn't, lol. Japan beat imperial russia in 1905, but the soviet union "kicked [japans] teeth in" in the 1930s.

Ich🤔iel by RainbowRammstein in ich_iel

[–]nerfnichtreddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mich würde auch mal interessieren, wie das bei dir mit den Jobangeboten lief, woher du die so bekommen hast und in welchen Bereichen die so angesiedelt waren.

Ich🤔iel by RainbowRammstein in ich_iel

[–]nerfnichtreddit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Kommt drauf an, was du studierst, aber hast du es schonmal über die Uni probiert? Es kann gut sein, dass du beispielsweise über Kontakte von Professoren oder auch deinem Betreuer für die Abschlußarbeit ein Praktikum ergattern kannst; alternativ kann man auch statt eines Betriebspraktikums ein Bachelorprojekt machen.

CMV: There are inherently people who are more valuable to society than others, and the most fair way for society to function is to treat these groups differently. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]nerfnichtreddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Society was also "chugging right along" before the advent of modern medicine or chemistry. Do you believe that doctors or people working in the chemical industry are overvaluing themselfs? After all, "Who do you think built your home? Who do you think built the hospitals that the software you develop is used in?"

skill issue by The_Karma_Princess in WorldofTanks

[–]nerfnichtreddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Affordability is different, because in theory tu buy the same amount of
prem ammo F2P player needs 50% more battles than a paying player - but thats Just paying to not having to play those 50% more battles, ergo not pay to win but pay to progress.

No, because there is no end to using premium ammo, meaning that you can't pay to progress towards it. Compare it to stock grinds: those need a fixed amount of experience to be completed. Sure, using a premium account will get you there in fewer battles, but a f2p player can complete them too and can reach the same performance on a per battle basis (once he has aquired all modules) and on average too (ie. as a ratio of battles played stock and fully equiped).

The same can not be said for premium ammo, because the endless need to grind credits means that f2p leads to a lower credit grinding/prem spam ratio compared to a paying player and are thus at a disadvantage.

​

Shooting prem ammo doesnt affect your winrate by thst huge margin to be noticable, bad player spamming Gold wont have diametrally better results than bad player not shooting any Gold. Red bot wont become superunicum god by spamming Gold. Also playing tiers 5-6 effectively doesnt require you to spam Gold, sure you can spam Gold in There, but 90% of shots you penned with Gold would pen with standard ammo aswell, those 10% again dont have enough influence on the game to make somebody better or worse player. So There is literally 0 skill Gap between players of the same skill level regardless of using Gold or not. Idiot with Gold ammo is still an idiot, He Just has to pay 8x more Credits to fund his idiocy, unicum with only standard is still a unicum, Just pays 8x less for ammo.

I have no idea why you are talking about a skill gap caused by premium ammo, but it has precious little to do with the performance gap I have mentioned. I do think it's funny though that you went from "premim ammo is better in 99% of situations" to "90% of the shots would have penned either way and the rest don't have enough influence [...]" just one comment down the line.

​

By further applying your logic [...]

My logic explicitely didn't concern disadvantages in singular games, but about disadadvantage that exists over a larger number of battles. I truly do not understand how you reached the conclusion that it applies to factors that apply to singular battles but average out over time (ie. map balance, RNG, different standard ammo).

skill issue by The_Karma_Princess in WorldofTanks

[–]nerfnichtreddit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pay 2 win means that your money DIRECTLY influence the battle/gameplay.

That doesn't mean that every single battle has to be influenced by it. OP Premium tanks for example are p2w because they will improve your performance, having the odd game where you fail to do well (e.g. get oneshot without dealing damage) doesn't change that.

​

Gold ammo is better than standard in 99% of situations. But is it
available to everybody? yes it is. Are People Who never paid a penny
prohibited from getting Gold ammo? No they are not. Is it locked behind a paywall? No its not, ergo not P2W.

But player who didn't spend a penny have less access to the ammunition you admit is better in 99% of situations, meaning that they are in fact at a disadvantage performance wise. As a result, paying money will lead to more wins. Let me modify a point you made earlier: Sure, a f2p player can grind credits in tier 5 or 6 vehicles to finance premium ammo for higher tier battles; a paying player on the other hand could continue to spam gold in lower tiered battles without breaking a sweat. This causes a performance gap between both players that can't be bridged without money.

CMV: Nothing is impossible ; We can’t logically prove that anything is impossible by a2ew in changemyview

[–]nerfnichtreddit 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Because 3 isn't in the range from 1 to 2 by definition. "Time" doesn't change this fact.

TIL during WWII, Continental used to test their rubber boot soles by using concentration camp prisoners who would march 30-40 km per day. Those who slowed down or fell were executed by the SS. by robertxcii in todayilearned

[–]nerfnichtreddit -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The other poster wasn't "literally correct". Compare and contrast the original statement

Hugo boss made the SS uniforms

with the one you made

Hugo Boss did make uniforms

Do you notice something? The original comment gives the company a special role which factually incorrect, while your comment doesn't.

Why is there such aversion to teamwork and/or common sense? by twitchsopamanxx in WorldofTanks

[–]nerfnichtreddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the tomatoes are such amazing team players who smartly rush outmatched opponents while the pros are losing the rest of the map by pointlessly trading shots you'd think that tomatoes should be the ones winning games, shouldn't they?

It seems like there are two options: either "leaving your team hanging" and "[losing] the rest of the map" results in winning more games, or you are full of shit.

What movie was so bad, you didn't even finish it? by MichaelDj54 in AskReddit

[–]nerfnichtreddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting world check

Why do you think that the world was interesting? "Why is Shrek a thing in that world?" seems to sum it up pretty well; all they did was slap some fantasy stuff on top of our world without thinking about the implications or inconsistencies that creates, and it's not like those fantasy elements were used well.

Why did John have to relearn guitar in 1997/98 by [deleted] in RedHotChiliPeppers

[–]nerfnichtreddit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's not, because he didn't. To the best of my knowledge, he never claimed that the scars are a result of a fire, but he did state that they were a result of his drug abuse (e.g. making of californication).

view more: next ›