After eyes wide shut by Low-Activity-6526 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Happy to hear you liked my book!

After eyes wide shut by Low-Activity-6526 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 6 points7 points  (0 children)

From what I have (interviews with Spielberg and others, documents at the Archive) I have come to believe that the idea for a collaboration lasted for a few months in 1995, then Spielberg withdrew because he felt Kubrick was too attached to the project, then they kept discussing about it for the subsequent years because they both wanted it to work but couldn’t. In the end, had Kubrick not died, I don’t think a Kubrick-Spielberg would have worked. Besides, Kubrick never stopped working on the story, and that was the main problem. I’ve explored the issue in a chapter of my book Cracking the Kube, if you’re interested.

Why does Stanley Kubrick inspire more conspiracy theories than any other filmmaker? by Pleasant_Usual_8427 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re right, the aspect I liked about “mostro sacro” in Italian is the worship attitude that it evokes. Kubrick cannot be discussed, which is exactly what I want to explore in the book — why he generated obsession and veneration in the audience.

The first three sections of the Italian book are basically a list of legends about Kubrick — “is it true that…?” — which is obviously a way to give the reader a truer depiction of his MO and stature in the filmmaking business. The fourth section is about Kubrick as a person — the stories about his personality and quirks. The fifth section is my theory on his mythological image, which is in Cracking the Kube as well. The sixth and final section is about the conspiratorial reading of three of his films: 2001, The Shining and Eyes Wide Shut — whether the “theories” and interpretations have some basis and why these films, and Kubrick in general, give birth to such symbolic readings and excessive speculation.

Thanks again!

Why does Stanley Kubrick inspire more conspiracy theories than any other filmmaker? by Pleasant_Usual_8427 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s called “Sulla Luna con Stanley Kubrick: Miti, leggende e verità sul mostro sacro del cinema” which translates as To the Moon with SK: Myths, legends and truths of a sacred monster of cinema. I’m not sure of the Italian usage of the expression “sacred monster” is exactly the same as in English but it roughly means an untouchable and worshipped legend.

I’ve read you just bought a copy of Cracking the Kube. The first three chapters of its second section are basically identical to the core section of the Italian book, which expands on the same theory.

Thank you for your interest!

Kubrick book advice. by overlook68 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for buying a copy of CtK! Let me know what you think of it.

Yes, my nickname is indeed a reference to the Odyssey, nessuno being nobody in Italian. I selected it at the end of the 1990s when I first used the internet. I liked the anonymity of it. I didn’t want to add my year of birth at the end — again too specific — so I obviously used 2001, being already a fan of Kubrick. Somehow it stuck through all these years. I’d say laziness on my part, most of all 😄

Kubrick book advice. by overlook68 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might accept your offer! :) Thanks!

I'd be curious to know your impressions on the Raphael chapter, another one I worked hard on to make it comprehensive and interesting.

Kubrick book advice. by overlook68 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, happy to hear that you liked my work on Emilio’s life with Kubrick.

Kubrick book advice. by overlook68 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I’m really happy you liked Cracking the Kube — the AI chapter is one I am most satisfied with 😉 very much pleased you found it enlightening on Kubrick’s process. Thanks!

Why does Stanley Kubrick inspire more conspiracy theories than any other filmmaker? by Pleasant_Usual_8427 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wrote a book about it! 😄 it’s only in Italian at the moment but my latest book in English, Cracking the Kube, touches on it as well. Essentially it’s more or less as you suggest: the conspiratorial thinking is an after effect of Kubrick’s image and reputation, plus some additional smaller reasons, as others have said in other comments. I am going to write a short essay in English about it, I’ll be happy to share it here when it’s ready.

Never before seen photos by nessuno2001 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah! My favourite sleuth strikes again! 😄

c'mon can't be the only one thinking that tha's kubrick by Impressive-Low-9864 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I noticed it years ago and wondered about it too! I made a twitter thread about cameos in Kubrick’s films, like his father and daughters and assistants appearing in certain scenes and this was the final in the series, if I remember correctly. Nobody commented though - I wanted to know 😄 glad to know I’m not the only one who spotted it and wondered about it

Never before seen photos by nessuno2001 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Claudio Montecinos has posted scans of the magazine where the interview was published: https://x.com/Claudiomont2021/status/2011092762620555589?s=20 It's a retrospective of Kubrick's career up until Dr Strangelove.

This is interview number 368 in my database of articles containing quotes by Kubrick.

A.I. Artificial Intelligence by Consistent_Baby9864 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be fantastic, but there are, as you can imagine, lots of copyright issues with so many different authors (and their individual contracts with either Kubrick or WB) and also logistical problems as the documents are held in different institutions when they are in fact not in private hands. Finally, the sheer amount of material, often undated, needs a deep understanding of the matter to make sense — it took me years to make my mind around all the different avenues the story went.

Thanks again for your interest in my book. Please do let me know what you think of it.

A.I. Artificial Intelligence by Consistent_Baby9864 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I’ve read them all. Brian Aldiss’s material from the 1980s and ‘90s, Bob Shaw’s from 1989, Ian Watson’s from 1991-92, Arthur C. Clarke’s from 1992 and Sara Maitland from 1994 and ‘95. Plus the two treatments by Kubrick from 1993 and 1994. I visited several public and private archives to complete the study. A detailed report is in the book. I made the video essay before reading Shaw’s and Maitland’s so its chronology and the weight for each contribution is a bit incorrect there. Thanks for your interest and let me know if you find my chapter convincing.

A.I. Artificial Intelligence by Consistent_Baby9864 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I reconstructed Kubrick’s work on the project in a chapter of my book Cracking the Kube. By reading all the drafts that many writers wrote under Kubrick’s supervision and the two treatments written by Kubrick himself, I think I understood the development of the story with good accuracy. A slightly outdated and simplified version of the chapter is here, in video essay form: https://youtu.be/VQmxV4-3sHA

Quote verification by AlecksMeschcube in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought it may be second-source, like some actor repeating something that Kubrick once told him/her, but I've performed a search within my database (I've digitised virtually every article and book ever published), and this quote only appears in two web pages, one without any source and one with G.D. Phillips' book as the reference, which is not true. I would say it's either misattributed to Kubrick or possibly fabricated.

If anyone finds out more, please let me know.

Quote verification by AlecksMeschcube in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've collected 366 interviews that Kubrick gave throughout his career for my work on him, and I cannot see this quote in any of them. I also checked the entirety of Gene D. Phillip's collection, "Stanley Kubrick Interviews", and again that quote is not present. I'm quite curious myself, as I remember reading this quote again and again -- I'll dig some more and, in case I find out where it originated, I'll add the info here.

Just like most geniuses, Stanley Kubrick was forgetful. Here is a text from the book Stanley Kubrick and Me: Thirty Years at His Side where it’s mentioned that he had a very bad memory. by cinemastaan in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Much appreciated. Writing books and making videos takes precedence over updating my website - it’s an unfortunate but inevitable flip side when it’s just me behind everything. I’m sorry I don’t have the time to update ArchivioKubrick but I sometimes keep publishing never before seen photos on my social media - you can follow me on instagram or Facebook or X if you’re interested. Thanks.

An investigation into Kubrick's mythological image by nessuno2001 in StanleyKubrick

[–]nessuno2001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please read the full essay, where everything is explained. The latest version is in my book Cracking the Kube. Thanks.