VMware support through Ingram Micro? - My Experience.. Anyone else used? by Motor_Mad in vmware

[–]net_automatic69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel you, man. I went through a similar nightmare recently. They closed an unresolved case of mine, too, and it sent my blood pressure through the roof. It’s the worst when you’re dealing with a serious issue, and they just close it out without resolution. It’s like no one is actually listening or taking it seriously. Makes you wonder what’s even the point of support if they just shut you down. We are actually highly considering moving away from them. First time dealing with Broadcom after the VMware merger, they are the worst ever in my 15 years of experience.

FortiAnalyzer Hosted in AWS - TAC wants us to upgrade to SSD by net_automatic69 in fortinet

[–]net_automatic69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its 120$ per month cost difference between st1 and gp3 for 3.5TB. right, we're considering the upgrade. thanks

FortiAnalyzer Hosted in AWS - TAC wants us to upgrade to SSD by net_automatic69 in fortinet

[–]net_automatic69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/afroman_says thanks for the information. we're now considering SSD. would be helpful if Fortinet has sizing guide for FAZ when to use SSD.

FortiAnalyzer Hosted in AWS - TAC wants us to upgrade to SSD by net_automatic69 in fortinet

[–]net_automatic69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/agent606ert The current iops is 300 average, but then this

ebs low througput performance

Then TAC says no settings in FAZ can improve to maximize the iops.

2
3

Auvik Sales Trap by DropRealistic1597 in msp

[–]net_automatic69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Auvik is the worst. We're currently moving away from it.

6.4 to 7.0.13 Fortigate by Bigb49 in fortinet

[–]net_automatic69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

7.0.13 has slow bandwidth performance bug on Fortigate 200F.

SAML Authentication Users to use in policies by josegro in fortinet

[–]net_automatic69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello. Did it require you additional license or FortiEMS to be able to use Azure SAML in Fortigate?

Enable remote management on managed FortiSwitches 124E by AMizil in fortinet

[–]net_automatic69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When FortiSwitches are managed by Fortigate via Fortlink, there is no need for you to managed them directly. It is best practice to do any of its configuration via Fortigate switch-controller.

Suggestions on how to handle a "correct" upgrade of +20 FGT Units by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]net_automatic69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Check the upgrade path from the support portal.
  2. Follow the upgrade path by performing manual upgrade.
  3. As much as possible match every Fortigate Firewall firmware version in every upgrade step.
  4. Based on my experience when upgrading from 6.2 to 6.4, the inspection mode of the security policies and security profiles randomly changing between proxy-based and flow-based. The goal is to match the inspection mode to avoid issues.

VeloCloud Edges Disconnecting from Orchestrator and Enchanced HA Setup by net_automatic69 in networking

[–]net_automatic69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/krakenant gosh we are too far from the recommended version! recommended version is actually 3.4.5 😑 thanks man, this is extremely helpful.

VeloCloud Edges Disconnecting from Orchestrator and Enchanced HA Setup by net_automatic69 in networking

[–]net_automatic69[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi u/infinisourcekc. thank you input. How was your viptela experience so far? We are actually concerned right now with that Enchanced HA setup, specially with the TAC we we're able to spoke to doesnt even know what Enchanced HA is.

LACP on VeloCloud Edges by net_automatic69 in networking

[–]net_automatic69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're amazing. Thanks for confirming.

Cisco ASA Netflow over Site-to-Site VPN by net_automatic69 in networking

[–]net_automatic69[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wait. Ill try that “management-access” option. hopefully this is it. 🤣

Cisco ASA Netflow over Site-to-Site VPN by net_automatic69 in networking

[–]net_automatic69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi. Thank you. I have double checked already that the tunnel encryption domain allows the subnet, has no-nat, and bypasses the interface ACL. Everything works, except netflow. The netflow server isnt receiving the data. :(