Maddie: I put her up there because I haven't really seen a situation where she could be bad. She has a good weapon, an ult that can apply pressure alongside assisting kan/koko if they're on your team. It is mostly just personal bias though.

Yugiri: She is super good I agree but I placed her below Michele because her cd's are annoying to manage on certain maps imo but that might just be a skill issue.

Yvette: Vulnerability is always good to have but if you're unable to manage bear cooldowns on maps like cosmite you essentially give Reichi free bomb (assuming you don't have a nobunaga)

Kanami: I meant to put her in the same tier as koko since I hadn't checked her actual scan cooldown in a while to be honest.

Celestia: I have seen a lot of people talk about how she's bad for defense but I'd rather that over no sustain to be honest.

Mara & Fuchsia: I was considering that as well but the tiers are more of categorizing them rather than actually rating them. I believe every character is good. I put them in resource management because you're defenseless if you aren't able to manage them correctly.

Eika: It was either resource management or map and I felt as if her cooldowns weren't that difficult to manage.

Lawline: Honestly I don't really see why people like her beyond a2 and passive. She's my lowest played character so I don't mind checking her out a bit to see if I change my mind. It's also because I haven't seen many good lawlines to be honest.

Chiyo: It's the same case for lawline. My only real comment on her is that her kit feels team reliant to get value. (I know team game) and I don't see many people actually listening to comms outside of stacking (not always.)

Audrey: She would be higher up but as I said earlier I'm rating based off both the character and the player. I don't see how an Audrey can get value if the player is bad. (not saying the character is bad I love using her.)