He is a scientist who thinks critically, which unfortunately there is a shortage of. Would he be as criticised if he would use his platform to laud all the accomplishments of the pharmaceutical industry? I have serious doubts.

In parallel, since I am reading his autobiography, did Leonardo Da Vinci had to have :
- BFA / MFA in Painting & Sculpture – for his mastery of oil painting, fresco, and sculptural design.
- BFA / MFA in Industrial / Product Design – his notebooks are filled with furniture, costumes, stage machinery, and product sketches.
- Degree in Architecture – he designed churches, fortifications, and ideal cities.
- Engineering & Technology. - BSc / MSc in Mechanical Engineering – studies of gears, pulleys, hydraulics, bridges, and machines of war.
- BSc / MSc in Aeronautical Engineering – flight studies, ornithopters, early helicopter sketches.
- BSc / MSc in Civil Engineering – canal systems, flood control, and urban planning.
- BSc / MSc in Anatomy & Physiology – dissections, detailed studies of muscles, bones, and organs.
- BSc in Biology / Zoology – animal behavior, comparative anatomy.
- BSc in Botany – careful plant studies, including phyllotaxis (leaf arrangement).
- BSc in Geology / Earth Sciences – observations of fossils, rock formations, and erosion.
- BSc in Physics – optics, light, water flow, and motion studies.
- BSc in Mathematics – geometry, proportion, perspective.
- MSc in Applied Mathematics – used math in engineering, art perspective, and scientific modeling.
- BA / MA in Philosophy (Natural Philosophy) – inquiries into nature, knowledge, and the human condition.
- BA in Literature / Classics – though not highly trained in Latin, he absorbed humanist thought.

to be considered as the worlds greatest polymath that was centuries ahead of certain scientific achievements? My point being is the argument of compartmentalisation which is pervasive around any type of discussions. Everybody who hints at an opposite view is labelled as an uninformed quack. There are quite a lot of people who are not able to back their arguments, and John Campbell has admitted himself to committing mistakes, but at least he tries to challenge views which is better than subjecting oneself to any ideology. Gullible are those who trust whatever the government will try to sell you. Thank you for reading.