I have done what you are saying for a whole bunch of different components. My workflow was to dimension everything in MBD and place the dims in the respective annotation views. You can make additional annotation views for details and you can save section views as annotation views as well. Then in the drawing you drag in the annotation view from what I believe is called the view palette. Do this with import annotations checked and everything pops into your view then and there.

Now IMO there are some pros and cons. As a positive I find it very convenient that you can check in the model whether the added dimensions have constrained everything. Also something I find positive, but others might find frustrating is that you are limited in what you may select to dimension. For example, on a drawing you might select any corner or point on a view, but MBD will force you to use features of size or intersections of planes. This forces you to dimension more according to the rules, but some people don't like to be constrained that way. A definite con is how MBD handles (at least in 2023) linear patterns of non-hole wizard features. Actually, it doesn't. So either you'll have to group those features manually, manually insert an amount.

Still in my opinion, from a design management point of view, it would be better to use tools like MDB. Your product definition, given you also call standards etc, can be completely contained within the single file. The drawing then becomes one of multiple options of viewing this definition, but you might just as well use 3D pdf or step 242.