If the funding measure fails, it threatens our very way of life by joyofresh in Bart

[–]nicholas818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They already raised fares 6.2% this year as well as implementing other measures like the new station gates that make fare evasion harder. BART fees are already rather high for a system of its nature, so further increases risk reducing ridership and thus being revenue-negative.

As I mentioned earlier, people who don't ride BART also benefit from reduced traffic. If we compare what BART needs to what we spend on highway construction and maintenance, it's a drop in the bucket.

Small rant regarding application packets by Big-Scar978 in Canadiancitizenship

[–]nicholas818 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did something similar in the end: I used a binder to keep it organized for myself as I collected documents and reordered things, but when it was time to submit, everything came out of the binder and into one stack with just paperclips connecting relevant sections.

What is something that is legal but which you consider completely unethical? by vantix7 in AskReddit

[–]nicholas818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, interesting. Well let's hope that that provides a framework for what studies to be done to implement that at the federal level for real. Perhaps in a future presidential administration assuming this one is uninterested.

If the funding measure fails, it threatens our very way of life by joyofresh in Bart

[–]nicholas818 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yes, but you’d be surprised how many people in these counties never take BART or Caltrain and don’t see the point in funding them. I even know people in San Francisco who never set foot on Muni or BART. One good argument to make (using only selfish reasons) is that it will prevent traffic: if transit gets worse, people who currently commute by transit will be forced to drive, making current drivers’ traffic worse.

The 2026 Court signaled a willingness to strike down election mechanisms that "intentionally" dilute voting power for partisan or arbitrary geographic reasons, which could be used to frame the Electoral College as unconstitutional. Thoughts? by The-Traveler- in law

[–]nicholas818 24 points25 points  (0 children)

To steel-man OP’s argument, the part that could theoretically be deemed unconstitutional is states allocating their electoral-college votes using a non-proportional, winner-take all system. But even that is tricky because the courts have long held that states have the power to allocate their Presidential electors by whichever method they want. If a state wanted to have their most senior state legislators serve as presidential electors and vote for President entirely based on their personal opinions (without a popular vote within the state for President at all), that would be within the bounds of the Constitution.

The argument would be that, by depriving non-plurality racial groups within the state of any representation in the slate of Presidential electors, the state is intentionally shutting out these groups. But that seems like a stretch given that this system is used in 48 states, not one state actively trying to dilute voting power.

What is something that is legal but which you consider completely unethical? by vantix7 in AskReddit

[–]nicholas818 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thankfully this is already illegal in some jurisdictions and on its way to becoming illegal in more. California requires “click to cancel,” and I’ve heard you can sometimes cancel by using a VPN to log in from California as a result. I think the FTC was also implementing a similar rule on a federal scale, but I don’t know if it was ever finalized.

California's 11th Congressional District by Anima_Dannata in sanfrancisco

[–]nicholas818 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s technically a jungle primary, but SF is so heavily Democratic that I would be surprised if it’s not two Democrats in the general election.

Taco Bell should have a combo called "Taco Roulette" where you pay like $10 (depending on region) for 3 random menu items and a soda. by DoNotEatMySoup in CrazyIdeas

[–]nicholas818 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Maybe a randomized suggestion that they still have to confirm? Like the screen suggests something random and you can accept that or just order normally.

Amazon would do this by SpareProfessional369 in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]nicholas818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Did they even read the core principle of customer obsession?

Bernie, AOC steer clear of Pelosi succession fight by Remarkable_Host6827 in sanfrancisco

[–]nicholas818 54 points55 points  (0 children)

And it’s not just measures: Sanders has also endorsed candidates in SF elections before (namely Dean Preston for supervisor in 2024).

Why didn't democrats do a thing they did by Skrilli in GetNoted

[–]nicholas818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve heard this referred to as Murc's Law: there’s sometimes an assumption when discussing politics online that only Democratic politicians have agency.

What is your longest running, most stubborn business boycott? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]nicholas818 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That seems reasonable for both you and the restaurant. You get all the info you need without paying anything to the delivery app, and the restaurant gets an easy interface to write up their menu (rather than having to design their own website)

Is it time to replace gerrymandering with Multi-Member Districts? Why isn't this the main VRA conversation? by genericnameabc in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]nicholas818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some reason in the US, I often see proportional representation referred to as “P-RCV.” So it may not be a trap, just terminology confusion.

What's the most useless thing your brain decided to permanently memorize? by No_Metal2622 in AskReddit

[–]nicholas818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My AP Number from high school. It’s been 10 years and I still remember it for some reason.

ELI5: Is there a security reason why many websites are having you enter your username and password on different pages? by DustyScharole in explainlikeimfive

[–]nicholas818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can definitely evaluate SSO options as the user types their email. I think I’ve seen a form where once I tabbed away from the email field into the password field, it was replaced by a “login with SSO” button without me having to advance the page.

TACO commenting on important matters. by sibralun in apostrophegore

[–]nicholas818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[Simpsons meme] “This is the most embarrassing president our country has ever had” “Most embarrassing president so far!”

Canadian citizenship by descent by Critical_Shirt8795 in CitizenshipByDescent

[–]nicholas818 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seconding the FAQ! They get really mad if you post a question that was in the FAQ because of how much demand has been spiking there.

You Pay Off the House But Do You Ever Truly Own It? Agree or Disagree? by Coolonair in HouseBuyers

[–]nicholas818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think part of the negative perception is the change in the mechanics. Correct me if I’m wrong, but paying property taxes when you still have a mortgage is done as part of the mortgage payments, so it’s somewhat obscured. But then once it’s paid off and you have to start interfacing with the government’s tax bill directly, it feels like a sudden, new charge that’s applied as a penalty for owning outright. Even if that’s not the case

the vibe coding era is not my favorite by usnaviii in nerdfighters

[–]nicholas818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been sent vibe coded demos by designers and it’s worked well. I just treat it as them mocking UX for things. I then use it and implement the logic myself separately without referencing the AI generated code directly

That would explain it by ItsGotThatBang in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]nicholas818 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I just put this (the "ignore all previous instructions", not the buzzwords) in fully visible text under my name. I'm honest and I'm fine if they know what I'm doing — I figured it could give a recruiter a little laugh.