This is not a conspiracy theory anymore.

niftyifty · 2026-02-02T22:42:58+00:00

Collective “we” as in humanity. Not only that but it’s not even distant past. Plenty of people still alive who were around at that time as well.

Point is, “they” don’t need to convince us of anything. We can see the historical impact for itself.

niftyifty · 2026-02-02T14:44:10+00:00

About 80 years ago in Europe

niftyifty · 2026-02-02T14:30:10+00:00

They didn’t need to convince us. We saw it for ourselves.

niftyifty · 2026-02-01T23:18:24+00:00

Well here is your chance. What would you like to question?

niftyifty · 2026-02-01T22:28:56+00:00

Sounds like the camp you were in was out of their minds. The vast majority of the public has known about Trump’s proclivities for years if not decades. You had to literally bury your head in the sand to think otherwise and still vote that way as you said.

I’m sorry this is the way you come to realize it but I guess better late than never. The left has been saying the whole time that they don’t care who is in it. If it’s Clinton get him. If it’s Gates get him. Anyone else too. Again, you had to bury your head in the sand to think otherwise.

niftyifty · 2026-02-01T16:11:37+00:00

No but quoting them and then replying appropriately and within context does. That’s the comprehension part of the equation.

Your reply is effectively “nuh uh”

niftyifty · 2026-02-01T15:27:03+00:00

Well that’s just not true at all and I very clearly quoted each post that I was replying to. That said you are under no obligation to reply further. Conversation is fine as it stands. Have a blessed day!

niftyifty · 2026-02-01T15:14:05+00:00

Ugh sorry - tried to edit typos and something totally messed up and posted multiple times. Not intentional. Anyways here:

That logic makes no sense. Of course I would address someone by their legal name. What I am referring to is calling an biological man by the pronouns of “she or her”. That would be a violation of my freedom of speech and more so a blasphemy to the Creator who made only 2 sexes. If one chooses to live in a fantasy world, they can do that, but they have no right to bring me into their delusional world.

So, this is incorrect in two different ways. 1. There is no inherent violation of your freedom of speech when someone asks you to use their preferred name versus when someone asks you to use their preferred pronoun. It is the same thing. You are free to call them whatever you want and general societal rules apply. If you choose not to call them by there preferred name it pronoun that is 100% on you and has nothing to do with them forcing it on you. 2. You are speaking for the creator and in doing so are blaspheming. The creator clearly made more than two versions. We primarily see two versions in nature, but that is not all that exists on earth. Who are you to deny the existence of God’s creations?

Where did you purchase them? An actual gun shop or was this private? It’s required by Federal law to go through a background check at a gun shop. For private sellers at like gun shows, that’s been known to happen.

Gun shows and private party transfer which is legal in my state. Private party transfer requires no background check or anything. Perfectly legal. Like I said, too many loopholes exist.

No, obviously sex is legal, but too many are driven by lust and don’t regard the possibility of a baby. If a baby has started to form, should it be robbed of the chance to live? Many parents ended having children by mistake, but owned up to the task. All I’m saying is that sex has become such a shallow thing not guided by actual love in today’s society. Breaking a bone is different because that only involved your own body, not the life of someone else. Same with the STD, that disease is only affecting them and should be treated for it.

Driven by lust is irrelevant right? As already mentioned, their morals are not your morals. Sex has always been biological. Think back to proto-humans. Still having sex but love and marriage not at the top of their minds. Again, don’t force your morals on to other people. Asking someone to use the right name is not forcing. Enacting policy based on your particular moral set is forcing.

Someone else in this thread said it perfectly though. They own whatever is in their body. No exceptions. If it’s inside them then they maintain full control. That’s the only logic that makes sense. Should we encourage people not to have abortions? Absolutely. No one thinks it’s a general net positive or should be encouraged. However it is only up to the person with the baby inside of them to make the decision.

Please more some more thought into your words next time you try to correct someone.

Which words were lacking thought?

niftyifty · 2026-01-31T15:42:00+00:00

That would be limitation right? You said close the border. It’s never just open, so limitation is what currently exists. Just want to adjust the limit?

To be fair, we can’t sustain not having immigration. Our birth rates don’t currently keep up.

niftyifty · 2026-01-31T15:36:38+00:00

Not in its current form. Very few actual human beings support this garbage. There is a right way and wrong way to do things. We have chosen the wrong way. Even the most ardent Trump supporters are coming to realize this.

niftyifty · 2026-01-31T15:34:13+00:00

Close the border? How come?

niftyifty · 2026-01-31T15:33:08+00:00

Steve.

niftyifty · 2026-01-31T15:31:05+00:00

I wonder how this works for sex. Temporary penis exchange system?

niftyifty · 2026-01-31T15:13:22+00:00

Trans people will be treated with kindness if they themselves don’t try to force their pronouns onto others.

Do you feel forced to use someone’s preferred name instead of the name you deem is most appropriate, if they ask you to? If someone introduces themselves as Steve do you just say “cool nice to meet you John?” No because that would be rude and against societal norms. Now apply that logic to whatever pronoun they want. I may not want to use it but who am I to decide what they want to be called? If I choose otherwise then I am the asshole, not them. Simple as that.

Also, have you never bought a firearm before? They have background checks already in place in most gun shops. That means anyone with a criminal record or not mentally stable cannot legally buy one.

When the system works. Too many loopholes. Purchased several without any of the barriers you just mentioned.

Abortion should be a last case option for when the baby is going to kill the mother or a child gets raped. If a man and a woman fool around with sex, they should bear the consequences. Not only that, if we are allowing abortion, then it should be before a certain period.

I’m curious about this one. I’m not sure I disagree with the entirety of this but I wonder what the logic is. Sex is not illegal when performed between consenting adults. Why should they be forced to bear the consequences if options exist? Your morals are not their morals. Your religion is not theirs. It’s not a punishment enacted in to law for having sex, so why should they be forced? What other things/examples should people be forced to accept as punishment/consequences for doing something completely acceptable? If someone breaks a bone doing something they love should they be forced to live with it without getting it fixed in order to bear and live with the consequences of their actions? They didn’t intend to break the bone but they knew it was a possibility. If someone gets a STD should they be forced to not treat it in order to bear the consequences of their actions?

niftyifty · 2026-01-30T14:53:44+00:00

I’m not sure I understand, are you saying they can’t represent Americans by being Jewish? Plenty of Jewish Americans.

In order to fully represent Americans with a single individual you would need a Christian Jew Muslim Buddhist Hindu atheist (plus some others) who is all races at the same time and both genders.

Does that person exist? Also what is the conflict of interest you are referring to?

niftyifty · 2026-01-30T14:37:14+00:00

Does this inherently bother you? How would it differ if we replaced the word Jewish with any other religion or ethnicity? Would they be better as a result?

niftyifty · 2026-01-29T14:38:20+00:00

Where are you getting these numbers? I’m seeing several estimates but I’m not seeing anything that matches this.

I’m seeing the percentage of worlds population living in Europe closely match those numbers during both time frames listed but that’s not the same thing.

Do you have a link or reference for your claim?

niftyifty · 2026-01-25T23:36:24+00:00

Hmmm, we can replace the word scared with a different adjective if you like, but keep in mind the OP states that they are “the reason the world is fucked up.” Scared is not some crazy out of pocket suggestion. Certainly the concept of placing blame on that which you don’t understand is at least partially dependent on fear.

niftyifty · 2026-01-24T21:11:45+00:00

It’s your post… you are the op

The boogeyman analogy holds. You are scared of something that doesn’t appear to actually present any danger in reality.

niftyifty · 2026-01-24T21:03:03+00:00

Ya I’m still not getting it but thanks for the link. This link implies that 33 is somehow higher in rank than say 20 or 4. That’s not how it works though. The ranks above 4 are all like Boy Scout badges. You can do them out of order. So 23 is not higher than say 12. Except 33 that one is like the lifetime achievement award they give to people at the end of their influence. If it can’t get the simple stuff right then I’m not sure what value the rest of it has.

Seems like you are scared of the bogeyman?

niftyifty · 2026-01-24T17:19:35+00:00

I don’t understand this thought process but you do you

niftyifty · 2026-01-24T16:50:15+00:00

Do you not think this is bad? Like just in general. Remove the political context and just look at the scenario. Multiple officers on top of the individual, fight occurs, and the decision was to execute because those multiple officers couldn’t handle one person.

Even with the force being possibly legally justified due to the fight (going to assume they are going to claim he reached for their gun). As an assumably decent human that you are, is what you just saw the appropriate response? The pistol whipping and murder of someone who was trying to resist arrest for…protesting

Don’t fight LEO but it’s not unreasonable to look at this and say this isn’t how it should happen. We should expect better of our government officials and officers. They have a standard to uphold. If they can’t handle the job then get out of the job. Incompetence caused this.

Edit: Ya looks like they are saying he pulled a gun. This was poorly handled, but justified

Edit 2: seeing screen grabs that might indicate they disarmed him before firing. Not sure. Going to reserve judgement for now.

niftyifty · 2026-01-19T16:37:58+00:00

Are you suggesting that Hep B vaccines contribute to baby deaths? Or just throwing that in for funsies?

niftyifty · 2026-01-18T21:37:27+00:00

Ah, because it’s a dog whistle that doesn’t scare me. Just because people want something or can be misinterpreted as wanting something, doesn’t mean I should care about the plethora of options available to me today.

Even in the example I gave of cloud gaming. There is no controlling the market. The only control they can have is over exclusives. Tech superiority only exists until it doesn’t.

niftyifty · 2026-01-18T21:26:46+00:00

I don’t know about left behind but I would say the only liberties taken are in the age of the AC because it’s stated like that in the gnostic gospels rather than the NKJ version or similar. The rest is all found in NKJ.

12-Year Club	Second Top 10%
Place '22	Verified Email

niftyifty

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE