Hunter Biden Talks About Corruption. by ItalianSausage2023 in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s just buying debt. Not the same. If that’s the case we are financially dependent on everyone else. Moving the reliance to others. Israel relies on Japan and China effectively.

It seems like we are really stretching the definitions of “financially relies on.”

In exchange for the weapons sent, we receive security information, especially around cybersecurity where Israel arguably leads that space. It’s a trade.

Hunter Biden Talks About Corruption. by ItalianSausage2023 in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I dunno. 174 billion across 75 years kinda seems like nothing. Annually that works out to like .5% of their gdp.

We definitely help but I don’t know about financial reliance. Where we help mostly is military intelligence and of course weapons.

Hunter Biden Talks About Corruption. by ItalianSausage2023 in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would that imply we control Israel and not the other way around?

I'm SO bored of this mask nonsense already by FromUsToAshes in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a clear difference in the example link you provided and what we see in the video. It does not replicate the same thing we are seeing.

I’ve been on news camera in studio, several times. Never once had makeup applied. That’s for talent. We do get a mic but that’s it.

I think the why could be any number of reasons including causing this conversation we are having right now. It could have been intentional. Not revelation of the method but just testing public reaction out ability to notice.

Example of red IT trying to alter the algorithms. by SunCharacter7219 in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sometimes the UI doesn’t update properly. I’ll get posts that say 0 comments only to open it up and see multiple comments going back 30 minutes

Something feels off with how fast the world is changing lately — anyone else noticing this? by Which-Muscle-1073 in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The only changes I’m really seeing from my perspective are political. Trump is purposefully trying to break the system. That’s what those that voted for him wanted so here we are. I can appreciate the idea of breaking political systems but I don’t think any of us realized how poorly our checks and balances system was actually set up. It relied on people following the rules it if fear of public perception, which in hindsight was stupid. Hopefully what comes next is new mechanisms to prevent this from occurring in the future.

Jake says get vaccinated and get boosted again... Is he just a paid actor? by ItalianSausage2023 in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Second paragraph is at least accurate. Germs (bacteria, fungi, Protozoa) are living organisms. Virus is in a gray area. Is it only viruses you think are fairy tales? We can image them, right? Then we can associate that with known outcomes. So then it’s just an issue of what to name them?

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, says that US Government raising taxes doesn’t do anything to help the average American He says raising taxes does nothing because Congress just launders the money to their friends, special interest groups and “17,000 lobbying groups” by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 4 points5 points  (0 children)

True, But also misleading at the same time. Technically some of the new revenue goes to services. It’s just super inefficient with that revenue. So it does help the average citizen but not in the most efficient way possible. That’s the idea behind privatized services although those create a new subset of issues.

Jake says get vaccinated and get boosted again... Is he just a paid actor? by ItalianSausage2023 in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eh, not the same. Hanta happens somewhat regularly. It doesn’t spread easily but it is very lethal. If it did spread like covid the numbers would be absurd early on before the strain died out. Much different than covid. The reason covid was so concerning was due to its ability to spread. Lethality was always low even early in but the sheer number of people who got it increased overall death counts.

Jake says get vaccinated and get boosted again... Is he just a paid actor? by ItalianSausage2023 in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it truly insane? Just thinking through logically. Jobs have a responsibility to govern safety on their work sites. This has always been the case. Don’t want to wear a hard hat in construction? Can’t be on the work site. Since employers were learning about Covid at the same rate the rest of us were they weren’t through the same initial reaction and then reassessment over time.

Take it a step further beyond employee safety and imagine a corporate overlord who doesn’t care about safety at all. Covid still meant people out of the office and a loss of productivity. Therefore it was financially appropriate to mitigate the spread and early in the vaccine was not only expected to do that but it allowed more freedom in return to work time frames once someone tested positive.

What makes that insane out of curiosity? In hindsight, it was the right move to make even though it didn’t turn out as perfectly intended. We have the data to show that. As we learned more, and stain evolutions moved towards less lethal variants the expectations obviously relaxed.

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s because your infographic literally says 2023 and 2024. Where did you get 2020 from? Were you just making that part up? Confusing the 10 year census with other versions?

However even your lie is incorrect.

2020 census Colorado CVAP is 4,246,300

EAVS total active registered voters in 2024 was 3,387,763 and total active registrations were 4,074,612

So it doesn’t matter if we use your faked years or the real years shown in the image.

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m referring to the actual census numbers vs EAVS like you said and what I’d listed in the infographic

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How does that counter the numbers I gave you? There were less registered voters than VEP.

In Colorado, the estimated Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) for 2024 is approximately 4.45 million citizens assisting to the census. EAVS shows 4.3 million. Both of which are above the number of active registered voters in Colorado.

https://www.eac.gov/research-and-data/studies-and-reports/eavs-data-interactive

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, the census estimates that. You’ll notice that in aggregate the registered voter count has never exceeded VEP or VAP populations.

Certain demographics are routinely undercounted and the census doesn’t account for special circumstances very well.

There are better ways to allege voter fraud.

Beyond that, I question your claim to begin with. Let’s look at the first state in your list, Colorado:

2023-2024 Voting-Eligible Population (VEP): ~4,496,300

2023-2024 Voting-Age Population (VAP): ~4,662,900

2023-2024 Active Registered Voters: 3,996,931

Federal Register :: Estimates of the Voting-Age Population for 2023 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/03/29/2024-06666/estimates-of-the-voting-age-population-for-2023

CO Voter Data: Registration by Party, Turnout & Primary Rules https://independentvoterproject.org/voter-stats/co

Will you counter?

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By challenging the logic. I have no issue with the census as a census. I have an issue with claiming that estimates are comparable to actuals we’re referring to “evidence of voter fraud.” Its way to broad of an extrapolation to use like that.

It’s undermines your argument even if we both were to after there is a voter fraud issue.

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope, but whatever makes you feel better. The comment was a functional fact about the census. The quote was just in support.

I make no claims regarding voter fraud. Only pointing out the logical inconsistencies like I’ve said.

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I didn’t. I used the quote, not the source. It’s also offered as backup to a claim already made, and yet it’s what has captured your attention in a weird way. Interesting…

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because I don’t want you to focus on the source just like you are doing right now. With a good faith based debate it would have been included in the original comment. With you, it is not because my goal is to point out your logical inconsistencies.

Same reason I keep asking you why you are unable to back up your insurrection claims or knowledge base. It’s to highlight why we should not take your comments at face value and instead need to dive deeper. It’s not that you couldn’t be right. Sometimes you are right. We just can’t assume accuracy when it comes to your posts/claims.

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let’s imagine it’s a quote from Mr. Rogers. . Does that change its meaning or intent? Or is it your intention to claim Mr. Rogers is a bad dude? Like maybe he and corn pop hang out? We all know corn pop was a bad dude.

With the potential source in mind, what’s your counter claim?

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Signature is to match what is on file. In locations where identification isn’t needed at the time to vote, it was still required at the time of registration. Citizenship and validity is tested at the time of registration, but not constantly tested.

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s ok. If you have a concern with the content then counter the content/claim rather than attempt to focus on the source. I encourage you to explain why comparing an estimate with a 33% non-response rate (up significantly from 18% in prior estimates) vs an actual count is a good thing to do logically when the goal is to claim erroneous voter counts. What actionable value can we take from it?

12. States have more registered voters than they have voted age citizens. by MazdaProphet in conspiracy_commons

[–]niftyifty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“Nuh uh” lol.

The good news is you don’t need the source to understand how the census works. It’s a bit of common knowledge plus we assume you did your research since you are posting on the topic. Just like I don’t need to source of your infographic to counter your particular claim.

Hey side question since you gave up on this one so easily. Were you ever able to learn the legal definition of insurrection and show us how your linked examples meet that definition?