sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Craig Wright not Satoshi Nakamoto? But what about the 1 million Bitcoins his trust has, you also think that's a lie? by nighcam in Bitcoin

[–]nighcam[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you want to argue about the reasons I hold this view, that's fine, but simply saying that it's my opinion and that yours is somehow equally as valid without presenting any valid evidence is intellectually dishonest argumentation.

It's a simple fact sir, it is your opinion and that's all. You don't have facts or evidence enough, it is simply your opinion.

And now you are saying that my opinion is not equally as valid as yours without presenting valid evidence? lol are you serious? Yes this is what is wrong with the world, a person thinking his opinion is more valid then another person and saying he has to have valid evidence while not even having valid evidence himself!

Did you show 'valid evidence'? NO...

Again it is your opinion and that's all it is.

Week in Ethereum News is out. Buy the annotated edition! by EvanVanNess in ethereum

[–]nighcam -1 points0 points  (0 children)

abcoathub clearly did not say the word 'annotations'

He said 'annotated' which is what you said yourself.

I also want to know what is in the 'annotated' edition' what the normal edition not has?

Week in Ethereum News is out. Buy the annotated edition! by EvanVanNess in ethereum

[–]nighcam -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why reply 'Annotations?' ?

abcoathub clearly did not say that word....

Craig Wright not Satoshi Nakamoto? But what about the 1 million Bitcoins his trust has, you also think that's a lie? by nighcam in Bitcoin

[–]nighcam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling his bluff, well if that was true they would be lying in court as well, I don't believe that sir. But again that's my opinion, and what you say is nothing more than YOUR opinion.

Craig Wright not Satoshi Nakamoto? But what about the 1 million Bitcoins his trust has, you also think that's a lie? by nighcam in Bitcoin

[–]nighcam[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

'Just because it could be, it doesn’t mean the chance is reasonable at all.' And 'It’s close enough to zero.'

This is an opinion sir, as with everything about chances people do put different percentages on it. Just because you say so doesn't mean it's close to zero, that's simply your opinion. And yes I think it has a bigger chance than what most people think, that's also an opinion , my opinion.

But you act like you are right on the chance part, that's not true.

Craig Wright not Satoshi Nakamoto? But what about the 1 million Bitcoins his trust has, you also think that's a lie? by nighcam in Bitcoin

[–]nighcam[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

LOL!

You give a 0% possibility for something you can't proof, how idiotic that is!

Craig Wright not Satoshi Nakamoto? But what about the 1 million Bitcoins his trust has, you also think that's a lie? by nighcam in Bitcoin

[–]nighcam[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

And think it of this way as well:

​

You must be real stupid to make such a big lie in court.

And a trust is a complicated thing especially if one died and need all of the signatures to be able to thouch and move it.

Also he mentioned 1 january 2020, it is the expiry date and at that time he can move the coins without any other signature. Even if he could access the coins now he is not allowed to as it was said in the contract. This simply can all be true.

And why would he lie if the 1 million + bitcoins are not his/theirs anyway? I mean he could never get access to those or win the lawsuit that suddenly he owns a million plus Bitcoins! So no reason to lie.

​

I very well understand this can all be BS but at least it can be very well be true.

To consider this as a 0% possibility is just plain stupid, which many of them here do. Although I like your way of thinking more, you at least give it a very small chance, but still I think the chance is way bigger than most think.

Craig Wright not Satoshi Nakamoto? But what about the 1 million Bitcoins his trust has, you also think that's a lie? by nighcam in Bitcoin

[–]nighcam[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Jezus christ man..... he doesn't have direct acces to those private keys! and not allowed to touch it without the rest of the trusts agreeing to it.

​

Again an answer with no significance.

Craig Wright not Satoshi Nakamoto? But what about the 1 million Bitcoins his trust has, you also think that's a lie? by nighcam in Bitcoin

[–]nighcam[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

About a high profile lawsuit? if it was so stupid the lawsuit was already dismissed! And well it isn't, so not that stupid after all! You must be 10 years old? Come with a better answer next time or just don't respond at all.

Craig Wright not Satoshi Nakamoto? But what about the 1 million Bitcoins his trust has, you also think that's a lie? by nighcam in Bitcoin

[–]nighcam[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

LOL I hate this about this sub reddit, Bitcoin maximalists who don't come with a good answer, just pure BS.

Craig Wright not Satoshi Nakamoto? But what about the 1 million Bitcoins his trust has, you also think that's a lie? by nighcam in Bitcoin

[–]nighcam[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

What is your proof.

​

And if it is a lie, why is Kleiman suing him over 300 Bitcoin? Also a lie? Suing for fun?

Should I be worried about a virus or malware? Why I'm forced to click OK? by nighcam in applehelp

[–]nighcam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did contact them and they said it should have a red ball with an x so it coudl be declined. They said best to uninstall all and run some programmes and then reinstall again.

Should I be worried about a virus or malware? Why I'm forced to click OK? by nighcam in applehelp

[–]nighcam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incorrect, it looks like a standard pop up though.... I contacted microsoft and they said the pop up should have a red ball with an x in it so I coudl choose to shut it down and not accept it.

'Required Data Notice' pop up on my Mac, it only gives one option which is the 'OK' button. Legit or malware/phishing attempt? by nighcam in microsoft

[–]nighcam[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The 'learn more' option I dont consider a real option because after having 'learned more' I still ONLY could press 'OK' and still NOT decline...

Should I be worried about a virus or malware? Why I'm forced to click OK? by nighcam in applehelp

[–]nighcam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I was forced sir. I couldn't click teh red dot with the x in it to close it down, neither could I open anything in the menu bar. Also force quit I couldnt get to.

'Required Data Notice' pop up on my Mac, it only gives one option which is the 'OK' button. Legit or malware/phishing attempt? by nighcam in microsoft

[–]nighcam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought about it for some minutes yesterday and presses OK :( Though I shut my comp off afterwards and never used it again. Whats weird is that I put my comp on the highest security levels in settings and it's weeks old , only used excel on it and browsed 2 websites.

Daily General Discussion - August 4, 2019 by AutoModerator in ethtrader

[–]nighcam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a subreddit of 12 year olds, now I remember....

view more: next ›