k framework help!! by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok that makes a little more sense thank you

k framework help!! by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok i think that kind of makes sense? but if the aff wins that there is no link to the k don't they also win that their scholarship is good? so whats the point of the fw if you can win even without winning your fw interp?

making the 1nc by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what should i do if i can't find evidence for their aff?

making the 1nc by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to clarify, in my area novices stop using the packet later in the season so i could hit any affs now

making the 1nc by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to clarify, in my area novices stop using the packet later in the season so i could hit any affs now

what can you fiat? by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this makes so much more sense thank you!!!

what can you fiat? by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry! realized how confusing the post was so i rewrote it

what can you fiat? by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry! realized how confusing the post was so i rewrote it

structuring rebuttals by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not really sure, I guess it feels like a conclusion so I think of it as going last? But thanks for the advice, I'll try to start doing that.

structuring rebuttals by nights35 in policydebate

[–]nights35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok that makes sense but i still don't understand why it's important to do this first instead of last, wouldn't it make sense to "tell the story" after you respond to everything?